# of required GPUs to reproduce Best outputs about magnet HOT 10 CLOSED

Thanks if you tell me the information separately for MagNet and Fast-MagNet.
In addition, I also want to know the required memory to take 1 batch on the GPU.

from magnet.

To train the backbone, you are suggested to run on big GPUs (from previous works). I used V100 32GB.

To train the refinement module, I used 2080Ti 11GB. However, you can reduce the batch size to run on GPUs with 8GB. I don't think there are too many differences in refinement's performance when reducing the batch size.

from magnet.

Thanks for your quick response.
I'm running and testing your codes and have some questions.

-How can I reproduce your paper results on DeepGlobe dataset?
In the paper, Tables 8 shows results of MagNet-fast:71.85, MagNet:72.96
However, in my environment, the results do not match to them.

running MagNet-Fast: sh scripts/deepglobe/test_magnet_fast.sh
output : coarse iou: 67.23, refinement iou: 68.22

running MagNet: sh scripts/deepglobe/test_magnet.sh
output : coarse iou: 67.23, refinement iou: 72.10

refinement ious reproduced from your code are lower than the paper results.
(MagNet-Fast:71.85->68.22, MagNet:72.96->72.10)
I used the same .pth file downloaded from your github code following your readme instruction.
--pretrained checkpoints/deepglobe_fpn.pth
--pretrained_refinement checkpoints/deepglobe_refinement.pth \

from magnet.

Hi,
The results in Table 8 are performed with the multi-scale/ flipping setting adopting from the GLNet paper for a fair comparison. Unfortunately, that testing script is not included in the current code.

from magnet.

Hello!

1. If possible could you please mail me the test code? ([email protected] )
   I really want to reproduce your paper results.

2. Or can you just write the ratio for multi-scales and related parameters?

3. In addition, I cannot find the multi-scale option in GLNet paper github below. Where is it?
   https://github.com/VITA-Group/GLNet/blob/7b7bdee196e368a1f3a32c54b984915f8e397275/helper.py#L390

from magnet.

Hi,

Sorry, it's not multi-scale, it's flipping/rotating testing. You can check the code here https://github.com/VITA-Group/GLNet/blob/7b7bdee196e368a1f3a32c54b984915f8e397275/helper.py#L434

from magnet.

To reproduce Table 8 "Segmentation results on the DeepGlobe dataset.", which �input size did you use for "patch processing" and "down sampling"? (U-Net, FCN, SegNet, ... ). The following two sentence in the paper contradict for each other.

1. "We also used the same input size 508×508 as GLNet."
2. MagNet, and 64 patches of the patch processing approach.

Downsampling does not matter, but it is not clear on patch processing experimental settings.
508x508 is not divided by 2448x2448 and did you produce 64 306x306 patches of 2448x2448 images and upscaled them to 508x508?

from magnet.

Hi, there is an overlapping between patches. You can use the code I provide to get 64 patches

from magnet.

Hello,

1. I think the backbone network is not trained with torch.no_grad() option in the following codes. Can I train the backbone network by removing the with torch.no_grad() option for both coarse_pred and fine_pred? Should I have to remove torch.no_grad() in aggregate features additionally?

with torch.no_grad():
coarse_pred = model(coarse_image).softmax(1)
fine_pred = model(fine_image).softmax(1)

2. Should I have to freeze the refinement module while training backbone network?
   Get early predictions

3. running codes with removing torch.no_grad() option requires 13GB and 19GB (coarse and fine, same training protocol except hrnet18+ocr on deepglobe dataset) for only single batch size. it is correct to being required 32GB GPU memory for training backbone network? (on deepglobe dataset, 508^2 input size, same scale, hrnet18+ocr backbone)

from magnet.

Hi,

There are two separate sections: one for backbone training, one for refinement module training. Please check that, currently the two modules can not be joint trained.

from magnet.