Implicit Function Declaration Issue about v HOT 2 OPEN

Well, V should be at least giving a better error message.

Seeing code like this makes me wonder... why? Why not just declare a normal function, and call it?

The only difference in doing that is that you have to name the function, instead of V coming up with a dummy name.

And that is exactly what you did to make it work.

All that said, it should probably work with the anonymous function. Or, as I said, give a nice error message telling you why not.

(it's just too FP for me. :-) )

from v.

It's why I said it may be bug. I would be fine with a better error message. On the other hand, it might point to an issue in the compiler. Not my area of expertise.

from v.