Adding a .v shortcut for .value about rfcs HOT 4 CLOSED

It's not more cryptic than $$ stuff from reactivity transform
I personally don't mind .value, but I was thinking about $ for the replacement of value to make it short and somehow similar to reactivity transform. See the example, both are for me similarly cryptic:

// reactivity transform
let count = $ref(0)
trackChange($$(count))

// .value replacement
const count = ref(0);
doSomething(count.$)

Another reason is that it's easily searchable (searching for .v may find much more results than you'd expect while searching for .$ should be more accurate)

from rfcs.

I've actually thought about this, but .v would look too cryptic IMO.

Something like .val could be short but still legible.

That is why it should be a shortcut. .value is not cryptic and then .v is the shortcut. Just like v-on is not cryptic and than @ is the shortcut.

from rfcs.

I've actually thought about this, but .v would look too cryptic IMO.

Something like .val could be short but still legible.

from rfcs.

duck不必

from rfcs.