Missing method in bounce API about slmmail HOT 7 CLOSED

Maybe :). Don't hesitate to do a PR if you find it useful. Actually neither me or @juriansluiman are using postmark so we cannot track changes as fast as for the services we use :)

from slmmail.

I wrote to the Postmark support to check with them. If they're indeed missing it and we end up using it I'll provide a PR. I've seen enough of both Postmark as well as your library to know that I want to use them both.

from slmmail.

They wrote back and it's not missing but documented under filters (they will soon publish clearer docs). I think it's not possible with your wrapper yet, in case I'm right I might extend it and make a PR as mentioned.

from slmmail.

If I understand it correctly it's perfectly possible.

They say you need to hit this: https://api.postmarkapp.com/bounces?messageID=bdd0ad3c-5128-4ad2-8b1d-223b1d3521dd

However it would make the signature of getBounces a bit complicated, so you could do a PR with a new method called "getMessageBounce" that do the aforementioned call.

from slmmail.

Just without reading docs (just lazy ATM), you have getBounce($id), isn't that sufficient for this call?

from slmmail.

Nope it seems to be different. Taht's what they say, previously you need to make a first call to get the bounce id, and then another call with the bounce id. Now, you can make directly a call without having the bounce id (just with the message id)

from slmmail.

Ah OK. @markushausammann can you make a PR? I would suggest to name it getBounceByMessageId() or getBounceByMessage() to make it clear what the method accepts. Would be cool to get the service implements more API completeness :)

from slmmail.