Validation concat method about witchcraft HOT 4 CLOSED

POW! Ok, it compiles now. Doesn't work, but compiles, so huge step!

@spec concat(Witchcraft.Semigroup.t, Witchcraft.Semigroup.t) :: [Witchcraft.Semigroup.t]
    def concat(a, b), do: a.failure <> b.failure

test "Adding 2 failures" do
    failure1 = Validator.Failure.new(["boom 1"])
    failure2 = Validator.Failure.new(["another boom 2"])
    result = Validator.Failure.concat(failure1, failure2)
    Logger.debug inspect(List.first(result))
  end

Prints out "boom 1", heh, so she ain't concating. I'll figure it out, thanks a ton for the help again!!!

from witchcraft.

Doh, List.first, I'm a moron, NOW WE'RE PLAYING' WIF POWAH! I love these libraries, y'all.

from witchcraft.

    @spec concat(Witchcraft.Semigroup.t) :: [Witchcraft.Semigroup.t]
    def concat(a, b), do: a.failure <> b.failure

Your spec defines concat/1, yet you implement concat/2. :-)
This is an elixir thing, not a witchcraft thing. :-)

from witchcraft.

WHOOPS!! Nice catch, doh, lemme try...

from witchcraft.