02jandal / conan_inquiry Goto Github PK

Looks almost the same in Firefox, Chromium and Android Chrome

I was searching for readline on your github page but the search only returned libtiff.

readline exists on bincrafters: https://github.com/bincrafters/conan-readline

Should include testing all script commands (possibly except deploy) and the web interface

Hi!

First all, this is a great tool to find any package!

Could you add https://02jandal.github.io/conan_inquiry/ on project description? The web interface address is not explicit on github project page.

Regards!

Relevant file: conan_inquiry/transformers/bintray.py

Right now only the latest version is included in the generated data:

self.bt.get('/packages/' + recipie.repo.bintray + '/versions/_latest')

• Use the data that is already fetched from the get package endpoint to include all versions, without using get version if possible to reduce API calls
• Add a way to show and select versions in the web interface

Attempts were made to use travis, it seems to run against Bintray rate limits all the time though (possibly because it shares those with others trying to deploy there, using the same IP?).

• Investigate if the issue is with Travis (rate limit because of IP shared with others)
• Depending on the answer to the above, either fix .travis.yml to work or investigate other services

Currently it is only possible to view the top-most package in the web interface (Installation section). Make it possible to select which repo is shown.

See also #3

The instructions in the readme are referring to a conan_inquiry.py file which doesn't exist.

I keep failing executing this project. Please update the readme with correct instructions.

There are several issues with search currently:

• If there is a perfect match in both name respectively description in two packages both will have the same score, and thus be ordered arbitrarily. This means that a package with "client" somewhere in the description could come before a package called "WebSocket client" for example.
• Searching in tags does not highlight them
• There should a way to explicitly search for keyword, authors, license, repo, etc.
  • Maybe similar to how Github does it (keyword:client license:MIT repo:conan-central)
• Scoring could take additional factors into account, like available package versions, project stats on Github, etc.