Hey!

I guess you accidentally found this repo. It seems I have a number of Arduino sources and this number is growing.

So I am simply going to throw those here and make notes. Why? I often want to find a pin with LED on a breadboard, connect I²S soundcard or some I²C thermometer without googling in the first place, that's why.

Why I am not using Gist? Because I can make notes here better.

So, deal? I mean, there are videos on YouTube telling you how not to hold the soldering iron by the tip or a barrel, so bear with me.

Still no deal? Fine, whatever.

Determine if MIDI 2.0 will require different schematics, find out about the required code changes.

UPD: I found a note in this article on MIDI.org:

The traditional 5 pin DIN transport from MIDI 1.0 uses a byte stream rather than packets. At the moment, there is no plan to use the Universal MIDI Packet on the 5 pin DIN transport. Unless/Until that plan changes, 5 pin DIN will only support the MIDI 1.0 Protocol.

On the other hand, MIDI forum admins claim:

As for 5 PIN DIn, Electron had products several years ago that had 10 times the speed of MIDI 1.0 on the same 5 Pin DIN connector, but with a slight modification of the part for the UART. MIDI-CI provides a method for negotiation so it would be possible for two devices to negotiate to a higher bandwidth on 5 Pin DIN. MIDI - CI makes a lot of things possible and we just need to prioritize the work that will get done next.

TL;DR: I am confused.

• Forum topic about MIDI 2.0 speed
• Forum topic about keyboards and MIDI 2.0 on Arduino