Note: There are some bugs in the implementation of VAE+PF. For an updated Pytorch implementation, please check: abdulfatir/planar-flow-pytorch.

1. Normalizing Flows: Planar and Radial Flows
2. Technical Report

The function that planar flow uses doesn't have analytic inverse which makes it unsuitable for direct likelihood estimation using the data. It can work well in VAEs though because inversion isn't required. However, for cases when the analytic target density is available, KL-divergence can be minimized explicitly (excluding constant terms). Following are the results for two complex 2D densities similar to the ones in the paper. The second column shows samples obtained using MCMC (See notebooks/Metropolis-Hastings.ipynb). The third and fourth columns show results using planar flows of different lengths (see notebooks/PlanarFlow-Example1.ipynb and notebooks/PlanarFlow-Example2.ipynb). During the experiments I found that minimizing KL is not always stable and doesn't always reach a good solution (especially for density 2).

True Density	Samples (using Metropolis-Hastings)	Samples (using Planar Flow; K = 4)	Samples (using Planar Flow; K = 16)

[REMOVED]

There are some bugs in the implementation of VAE+PF. For an updated Pytorch implementation, please check: abdulfatir/planar-flow-pytorch.

Originally, this repository contained notes and code on normalizing flows which we did as a part of a course project (CS6202 @ NUS). Some ideas are borrowed from this repo.