adtac / exterminate Goto Github PK

Hello, instead of always modifying the number you could instead modify it randomly (for example one out of every 100 numbers will be modified the other 99 will be the same). So the problematic behavior will only happen once in a while making debugging impossible!

CPython in particular is known to cache a lot of thing in particular integers from -5 to 250something.

So technically you can swap some integers so that 69 == 42 is True , or 41+1 is 36 (see how to do it).

That's a really bad idea though. You might not like it.

May I suggest also for the random module to always return the same value.

4 is a good one

One of the advantages of Python over a language like C is that you can directly iterate over arrays. No more for (var i = 0; i <= my_list_length; i++) (or was it i < my_list_length ?), just do for i in my_list. No risk of reading off the end of an array.

…unless, of course, some dastardly person were to overwrite the __iter__() method on your list that overran the end of the list. But who would do that?

(You could so something similar for strings, by having them continue until you "find" a null terminator.)

Have fun!

# Make the `class` statement create dicts


import builtins

def build_class(body_func, name):
    namespace = {}
    exec(body_func.__code__, namespace)

    for key in list(namespace.keys()):
        if key.startswith('__'):
            del namespace[key]

    return namespace

builtins.__build_class__ = build_class
class Foo:
    a = 1
    b = 2


print(Foo)

we should definitely do this!