I know this is bike shedding, but I wanted to raise once again the issue of the group name, this time on business model grounds. My reasoning goes like this: if we're to present a business model and be credible to people evaluating our work, why not being named after a company (synapta) or, if you prefer, after a software development collective backed by synpata (libre company) rather than being named after something weird (and frankly ugly and twenty-ish) like "las panteras"?

On this point: why don't we put the repository under the libre company umbrella? Why don't we open it from the beginning and then brag over the fact that we're open and we follow standards and good coding practices (sure we need to find out those practices for the domain of interest first).

Whaddya reckon?