Giter VIP home page Giter VIP logo

guacamole's People

Contributors

ataki avatar hongxia avatar

Watchers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

guacamole's Issues

Feature: Obtain Advogato trust metric for Dandekar model

Background

We have successfully generated a Dandekar graph for the milestone with ~7k nodes. We now need to evaluate trust metrics. A part of this process is to find seed parameters which will allow us to obtain a non-trivial trust result, if such exist (non-trivial means that a positive trust score is assigned to nodes that are further than 3 hops away from the source node). If this result is not possible, explain why.

Goal

The goal is to:

  • find seed parameters such that we obtain a non-trivial result when running the algorithm on a Dandekar-generated graph, and
  • if none exist, explain why

Implement score in order to compare attack resistance among two graphs

Background

We want to devise and implement a procedure which allows us to evaluate the relative trust metric of two graphs. The approach we have settled on at the moment is:

  • given the two graphs, pick source nodes at random
  • evaluate the trust metric for both graphs, and generate list of "untrusted" nodes. Designate this the "bad" set.
  • choose nodes to delete subject to a function inversely proportional to distance from the source node
    (i.e. much more likely to be deleted when farther away)
  • evaluate the trust metric for both graphs again see how much the newly obtained "bad" set compares to the old "bad" set from the first run.

We will generate a scoring function based on the severity of the bad nodes chosen. Our scoring function needs to decide whether to punish additional / missing bad nodes the same way, or to score additions more heavily than bad nodes. This will dictate what type of attack we want to mitigate most.

Since this is a large and important task, there will be three big steps:

  1. @ataki to research / brainstorm scoring functions and discuss significance with TA's
  2. @Hongxia and @LCanceled to weigh in and ultimately decide on scoring function for their graphs

Feature: Implement Advogato Trust Metric

Goal

Implement trust metric as outlined here in Trustlet for the Advogato dataset.

Dataset (Keep in mind these are in the .dot format, and so may need to be parsed first)

Summary here. Reference dataset here. Try to run on the daily output data here. Summary of dataset

Output

A script tm_epinions.py, and a visualization in figs/tm_epinions.png

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    ๐Ÿ–– Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. ๐Ÿ“Š๐Ÿ“ˆ๐ŸŽ‰

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google โค๏ธ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.