Giter VIP home page Giter VIP logo

Comments (4)

ialbert avatar ialbert commented on July 30, 2024

Correct.

Unfortunately, what is going on here is that the featureCount program has changed its behavior via an ill-informed decision.

Starting with a specific version, one needs to pass both the -p and --countReadPairs flags, but before that version, only -p was needed for the same behavior, and the presence of the second flag raised an error.

Even as of last year the installation process installed the older version of featureCounts so I chose the first form. Now it seems the updated version gets installed so the second, two flag form will be required.

I will test the various installation methods and will make the change soon.

from biostar-handbook.

ialbert avatar ialbert commented on July 30, 2024

I made the changes in the book, thanks for reporting and reminding me to make this change.

Nice job noticing it.

You are well on your way to bioinfoguru-ness, the bioinformatics world is full of inconsistencies!

from biostar-handbook.

ialbert avatar ialbert commented on July 30, 2024

I just realized that I did not explain the effect itself,

when we run a single-end sequencing each read corresponds to a transcript fragment

when we run a paired-end sequencing each transcript fragment produces two reads.

Note that in the second case two measurements come from a single fragment. Hence during paired-end sequencing at the same coverage, only half as many independent transcripts will be sampled. This is the reason why the counts are half as much.

This is to say that paired-end sequencing is disadvantageous in any situation where we are counting reads since we lose half the data. We might gain more mapping accuracy - though that is debatable - but the net effect is losing half the coverage and we lose a lot of statistical power. So in general paired-end RNA-Seq is not advisable.

the only time it paired-end RNA-Seq makes sense is when we are assembling transcripts, for all other cases it leads to coverage loss

from biostar-handbook.

BioinfGuru avatar BioinfGuru commented on July 30, 2024

Thanks for that, cheers.

So for well annotated genomes, there's really no need for paired-end, especially if the goal is differential expression. Makes perfect sense. Thanks.

from biostar-handbook.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.