Giter VIP home page Giter VIP logo

dynamap's People

Contributors

mnapoli avatar

Stargazers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

Watchers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

Forkers

nealio82

dynamap's Issues

RFC: Supporting advanced design patterns with Dynamap

I've spent a little bit of time looking at Dynamap and thinking about how to adapt it for supporting more advanced access patterns than a simple multi-table key/value store (eg; encapsulating an entire application's data store within a single table, as is the AWS recommendation)

Adding GSIs and LSIs to support m:m and o:m 'relationships' are probably the most daunting part of gettting to grips with DynamoDB, and something which I think we can support relatively easily.

However, I think this will necessitate some deep changes in the way Dynamap currently works. Documentation will also need to be clear about how best to use / implement the design patterns with Dynamap / DynamoDB, including defining your access patterns before you start creating tables where possible, and also recommending best practices such as using UUIDs for identifiers.

I was thinking that we could automate the generation of GSIs and LSIs by using something similar to Doctrine association mapping, using annotations (or perhaps PHP array-based config similar to what the current version of Dynamap uses).

To do this, we'll probably need to create a simple schema generation tool and compare it against the table definition. The knock-on of this is that we'll also need to be able to create migrations of some sort (or maybe just a schema update tool).

At the moment I think the design constraints mean we'd probably need to define one or more 'root' entities (eg Article), and allow relationship mapping between those and linked entities by creating a GSI or LSI depending on if the relationship is m:m or o:m. However, I'm not 100% certain on this. I need to do more reading / experimenting / talking to my rubber duck to see if it's actually the case.

I propose that we alter the hierarchy of the mapping to move the table element higher, in order to reinforce the notion that multiple entities can live inside the same wide-column table:

eg, to have:

$mapping = [
    'tables' => [
        'name' => 'articles',
        'mappings' => [
            Article::class => [
                'keys' => [
                    'id',
                ],
            ],
            Author::class => [
                'keys' => [
                    'id',
                ]
            ]
        ]
    ]

rather than:

$mapping = [
    Article::class => [
        'table' => 'articles',
        'keys' => [
            'id',
        ],
    ],
   Author::class => [
        'table' => 'articles',
        'keys' => [
            'id',
        ],
    ],

Adding relationships in (assuming a PHP array config rather than annotations at this moment in time), we could end up with something like this:

$config = [
    'tables' => [
        'name' => 'articles',
        'config' => [
// Set AWS table options, eg: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/amazondynamodb/latest/developerguide/ProvisionedThroughput.html
            'ProvisionedThroughput' => [
                'ReadCapacityUnits' => ...,
                'WriteCapacityUnits' => ...,
                ],
        ],
        'mappings' => [
            Article::class => [
                'keys' => [
                    'id',
                ],
                'relationships' => [
                     Author::class => 'manyToOne', // inverse of 'oneToMany' on Author below
                     Tag::class => 'manyToMany' // will create a GSI
                ],
            ],
            Author::class => [
                'keys' => [
                    'id',
                ]
                'relationships' => [
                     Article::class => 'oneToMany', // will create an LSI
                ],
            ],
            Tag::class => // ...
        ]
    ]

Note: to support multiple entities in the same table, PK & SK fields will probably be need to be prepended with the entity name, eg Article-1319f90c-d8b2-46d9-ac2b-0255eee97374

I was planning on looking at roave/better-reflection to reconstitute the objects after fetching from DynamoDB & to inspect properties for mapping, but at the moment I'm not sure if it's necessary or not.

Edit: for the time-being I think I'll stick to PHP's own reflection API until I need better-reflection.

For reference, these videos talk about modelling relationships inside a single table with DynamoDB (both are well worth watching):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ziqm6q-JsGQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HaEPXoXVf2k

WDYT?

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    ๐Ÿ–– Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. ๐Ÿ“Š๐Ÿ“ˆ๐ŸŽ‰

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google โค๏ธ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.