brockpetrie / dynamictextgroup Goto Github PK

Hey Brock, Trying this out on a local install, 2.2.3 and dev branch of extension.

I checked the required field for the extension and whenever I add new text group and click save, it says that my field is Required... but it's not empty, so shouldn't error.

See screen grab of what I see when I try and save: https://dl-web.dropbox.com/get/Public/Screen%20shot%202011-09-17%20at%2012.22.21.png?w=c56465e7

I'm using the select field for manual Yes, No drop down options and a textfield for the entry text.

Hi mate — is the development branch going to be for 2.3 compatibility? I've got a need for this field on a 2.3 project. Should I use the development branch? Apparently you may not need Stage any longer, using duplicator instead?

/cc @nilshoerrmann

It seems like it's not possible to edit multiple instances of this field in the section editor. The editor only works for the first field in the list. The other fields just show an empty stage and a Add field button that won't react on click.

As the title suggests, the 'Add field' button doesn't seem to work on 2.3.2. It causes the page to reload, so it;s triggering something, but nothing actually happens.

No console errors before the refresh to report.

This is using the development branch of the extension.

There is a reference to a missing https://github.com/brockpetrie/dynamictextgroup/blob/development/fields/field.dynamictextgroup.php#L188

When you create a field all is good, When you edit a section with dynamictextgroup field the error in layout occurs. When I inspect element I noticed that a reference to the missing script came up.

Hi Brock,

Been playing a bit more and discovered that if my field is a required field and I set the validation of a field to numeric, I can't save the section due to "0" not being validated as a number.

Basically, trying to build a Quiz and have all fields with no value have a count of zero. If it's a positive value, all is well.

I'm not too hot on regex so woudln't know where to begin there.

Is this something you've encountered yet?

Has anyone ever attempted to add textarea as a field option here?

Would be cool addition to list of field types.

If you go into the section editor and save it, with or without changes, the widths of the fields within the DTG screw up. The first one becomes a negative value in the hundreds, normally around -900 for me. While the rest become massive positive values, normally all of which are over 1000.

Then when you try and drag them back into place, they don't move.

The only fix is to alter the DB directly.

Oh and this is on your development branch too.

INSERT INTO sym_fields_dynamictextgroup (field_id, allow_multiple) VALUES ('77', '1')

Getting this error on a 2.3.1 install.

When entering wrong data in a textfield with a validation rule – like number – the field highlights all textfields in that column. I'd expect that it only highlights the ones that actually contain errors.

Nevermind, I was having a slow moment.

SELECT SQL_CACHE e.id, e.section_id, e.author_id, UNIX_TIMESTAMP(e.creation_date) AS creation_date, UNIX_TIMESTAMP(e.modification_date) AS modification_dateFROMsym_entriesASeLEFT OUTER JOINsym_entries_data_93ASed ON (e.id=ed.entry_id) WHERE 1 AND e.section_id= '18' ORDER BYed.value asc LIMIT 0, 1

When trying to navigate to the section with this field.

This is using the development branch of the extension.

I see this black square in the section settings:

Using Safari 5.1 und Mac OS Lion.

You have set the schema row to be a varchar with a limit of 5000 characters but varchar can only ever have 255 chars in MySQL, to my knowledge anyway. If you change it to be a text type instead, then it shouldn't be an issue.

I was creating DTG fields with 4-5 fields within, but because of the varchar restrictions it was cutting off half the schema.

INSERT INTOsym_fields_dynamictextgroup(field_id,allow_multiple) VALUES ('45', '1')

Getting the above error message while trying to save a section containing 1 dynamictextgroup field... not preferences, just purely trying to save the section.