caderek / aocrunner Goto Github PK

Despite the input.txt showing in the folder, it is saying there it is not there. On MacOS Ventura - Visual Studio Code running aocrunner 1.9.1

i input my first answer on the aoc website, then found aocrunner and used it for my second answer.

the problem is, i can't send the answer in the cli

Type fetch or f - to fetch the input
Type send  or s - to send the solutions

✔  … s

Part 1:
Status: ALREADY COMPLETED or LOCKED

am i out of luck for day 1?

Hi,

let me say thank you for this package first. I'm really enjoying it.
I found one issue with test input when using template literals. It looks like it adds some wierd whitespace or uses something als instead of \n when using multiline strings.
Had this issue on day03 part1.

part1: {
    tests: [
      {
       // works:
        input: `00100\n11110\n10110\n10111\n10101\n01111\n00111\n11100\n10000\n11001\n00010\n01010`,

        // does not work: (multiline string)
        input: `00100
        11110
        10110
        10111
        10101
        01111
        00111
        11100
        10000
        11001
        00010
        01010`,
        expected: 198,
      },
    ],
    solution: part1,
  },

Hello 👋 I just discovered this, so can't push the last 6 solutions - is there a way to pull in the stats so far, i.e. stars completed, time finished for each part, etc to the README?

Hi, would you be open to adding jest as a test runner and being able to make a .test.js file and have multiple test suites. I find that the single test runner in indes.js works but I would like to have multiple test assertions for multiple unit/functions. In the current scenario I have to run each function that i want to test within the single run function. Thoughts?

with node 16.5.0 running npx aocrunner init has this error

file:///Users/bschulze/.npm/_npx/b3b346747336e290/node_modules/aocrunner/lib/io/copy.js:3
  fs.cpSync(fromDir, toDir, { recursive: true });
     ^

TypeError: fs.cpSync is not a function
    at copy (file:///Users/bschulze/.npm/_npx/b3b346747336e290/node_modules/aocrunner/lib/io/copy.js:3:6)
    at init (file:///Users/bschulze/.npm/_npx/b3b346747336e290/node_modules/aocrunner/lib/actions/init.js:43:3)
    at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:96:5)

when running with node 17.2.0 successfully created

Would you be open for an optional VS Code setting available during setup ?

Scenario :
User runs npx aocrunner init and is presented with the setup wizard.
After the user has selected their language, package manager, folder, name etc... an optional question is asked:
Would you like to enable VS Code integration/launch.json settings ? (y/N). (Or something similar)

If the user specifies "Y", a new .vscode/launch.json file will be added.

This will allow the user to press (F5/Ctrl+F5) or select Run and have VS Code prompt them for the number of the day they want to run.

(Example picture below)

Let me know if you'd be open to something like this and I can open a PR.

Today, when I launch the prompt I get:

Could we imagine having a more concise output?

• removing all empty lines?
• Not run part2 when part one is not done? Run only part2 when part 1 is done?
• remove completely the Total time?

All this by config? Or not?

Let me know what do you think :)

When I waork on my solution I usually want the code to be run on tests only and not on the real data. Can this be switched off? If I have several tests and some console.log debugging messages in my code, the run on real data usually sends lots of these messages and make debugging not so easy.

PS: Thanks for a great tool.

Hey,

I absolutely don't want to take up much of your time with this issue so please if it's totally out of scope just close it.

I've been using this runner and I really like it but with the strict ESM settings, I'm not really sure which package.json or tsconfig.json things I'd need to set to get tests working (initial attempts fell over relating to ESM).

If you happened to know how to set this up, or felt like it would be a useful addition to the runner as the exercises get trickier and testing smaller parts might be useful, that would be super awesome.

Cheers for the great project either way!

Same as issue #17 - Can't seems to make it work.
I tried updating the version to 1.9.2 but it didn't work. Tried with node v16.18.1 and node v19.2.0
Working on macOS Monterey, Intel i5 processor.

Can you please have a look? thanks! 🙏🏼

Could we prevent send solution when onlyTests ?
And/or send the solution with real input ?

Per this thread on reddit from the creator of AoC, API requests may be completely blocked soon if they do not include an appropriate User-Agent header.

If you have any kind of tool, website, script, plugin, etc etc that sends requests to AoC, please include your contact information (like your email address) in the User-Agent header of every request. (That's the contact info of the person that maintains the code sending the automated requests, not the contact info of the person using your code.) I'm seeing a lot of abusive traffic from tools that just identify themselves as stuff like python-requests/x.y.z, so I'll probably be blocking User Agents like those entirely soon. Even better would be to also include a URL where I can see the tool, too; a good User Agent would be something like github.com/topaz/name-of-tool by [email protected].