capeguy / duke Goto Github PK

Leftovers from the previous week

• You are done with previous weeks work(:heavy_check_mark: well done!)

Progress of this week

• docs/REAME.md is updated(:heavy_check_mark: well done!)

• docs/Ui.png (the name is case-sensitive and filename should be an exact match) has been added(:heavy_check_mark: well done!)

• a jar file has been released in the past week(:heavy_check_mark: well done!)

• product website available at http://capeguy.github.io/duke (:heavy_check_mark: well done!)

_{Note: the above observation was done by the CS2103-feedback-bot and covers changes up to 2020-02-19 00:00:00 only. If you think the above observation is incorrect, please let us know by replying in this thread. Please include links to relevant PRs/comments in your response.}

Leftovers from the previous week

• You are done with previous weeks work(:heavy_check_mark: well done!)

Progress of this week

• A version tagged A-MoreOOP is in the repo(:heavy_check_mark: well done!)

• A version tagged A-JUnit is in the repo(:heavy_check_mark: well done!)

• A version tagged A-Jar is in the repo(:heavy_check_mark: well done!)

• A version tagged A-Packages is in the repo(:heavy_check_mark: well done!)

• Has branchesbranch-Level-7 branch-Level-8 gradle master ui-no-gradle ui-with-gradle (:heavy_check_mark: well done!)

• A pull request exists from your repo to the module repo(:heavy_check_mark: well done!)

_{Note: the above observation was done by the CS2103-feedback-bot and covers changes up to 2020-01-29 00:00:00 only. If you think the above observation is incorrect, please let us know by replying in this thread. Please include links to relevant PRs/comments in your response.}

Leftovers from the previous week

• You are done with previous weeks work(:heavy_check_mark: well done!)

Progress of this week

• At least 2 PRs are in your fork #8 #7 #6 #5 #3 #2 (:heavy_check_mark: well done!)

• A version tagged A-Assertions is in the repo(:heavy_check_mark: well done!)

• A version tagged A-CodeQuality is in the repo(:heavy_check_mark: well done!)

• A version tagged A-Travis is in the repo(:heavy_check_mark: well done!)

• A version tagged B-Snooze is in the repo(:heavy_check_mark: well done!)

_{Note: the above observation was done by the CS2103-feedback-bot and covers changes up to 2020-02-12 00:00:00 only. If you think the above observation is incorrect, please let us know by replying in this thread. Please include links to relevant PRs/comments in your response.}

Progress observed

• A version tagged Level-1 is in the repo(:heavy_check_mark: well done!)

• A version tagged Level-2 is in the repo(:heavy_check_mark: well done!)

• A version tagged Level-3 is in the repo(:heavy_check_mark: well done!)

• A version tagged Level-4 is in the repo(:heavy_check_mark: well done!)

• A version tagged Level-5 is in the repo(:heavy_check_mark: well done!)

• A version tagged Level-6 is in the repo(:heavy_check_mark: well done!)

• A version tagged A-TextUiTesting is in the repo(:heavy_check_mark: well done!)

• A version tagged A-Enums is in the repo(:heavy_check_mark: well done!)

_{Note: the above observation was done by the CS2103-feedback-bot and covers changes up to 2020-01-27 00:00:00 only. If you think the above observation is incorrect, please let us know by replying in this thread. Please include links to relevant PRs/comments in your response.}

Leftovers from the previous week

• You are done with previous weeks work(:heavy_check_mark: well done!)

Progress of this week

• A version tagged A-Gradle is in the repo(:heavy_check_mark: well done!)

• A version tagged Level-10 is in the repo(:heavy_check_mark: well done!)

• A version tagged A-CheckStyle is in the repo(:heavy_check_mark: well done!)

• A version tagged A-Varargs is in the repo(:heavy_check_mark: well done!)

• You have added comments on at least two PRs nus-cs2103-AY1920S2#147 nus-cs2103-AY1920S2#161 (:heavy_check_mark: well done!)

_{Note: the above observation was done by the CS2103-feedback-bot and covers changes up to 2020-02-05 00:00:00 only. If you think the above observation is incorrect, please let us know by replying in this thread. Please include links to relevant PRs/comments in your response.}