Giter VIP home page Giter VIP logo

Comments (6)

chan-y-park avatar chan-y-park commented on August 16, 2024

Andy, indeed Figure 16 of 1204.4824 illustrates a nice example of such cancellation, but on the other hand I can't come up with an algorithmic way of implementing such signed counting of soliton number off the top of my head. I think you once mentioned that you implemented that in your Mathematica code, could you briefly describe how we can do that?

from loom.

plonghi avatar plonghi commented on August 16, 2024

Actually, the relative signs between solitons shouldn't be hard to compute, at least in principle. We just need to properly integrate the change in tangent direction along the soliton path (including possible discrete corrections from joints and branch points).

What I find a little harder is how to understand when a 3-wall intersection is stable against perturbations in \vartheta (without actually changing \vartheta).

But strictly speaking, do we even need to know if the intersection is 'stable'?
If we have two overlapping S-walls S_{\alpha+\beta} (one incoming, and one generated at the joint) it's fine to cluster them together into a single wall, with soliton content given by the sum. I think the formal parallel transport would be the same.

from loom.

neitzke avatar neitzke commented on August 16, 2024

from loom.

plonghi avatar plonghi commented on August 16, 2024

Thank you for the insights, knowing that integration of the phase is generally superfluous will save us quite a few headaches with numerics, plus CPU time.

There is one more detail which I forgot previously, but is important: to sum solitons we should classify them by relative homology, or some surrogate of that notion. Did your code handle this too?
In the simplest cases, where C is just the complex plane it shouldn't be too difficult.
But if C is e.g. a cylinder it could be tricky to correctly match solitons within the same relative homology class (I'm thinking of herds in SU(3), where solitons can wind around C).

from loom.

neitzke avatar neitzke commented on August 16, 2024

from loom.

plonghi avatar plonghi commented on August 16, 2024

I see, thanks for the clarification. Handling the generic case would already be a wonderful step for us at this point.
More generic cases may not be too hard to deal with, on a case-by-case basis if necessary. But that's for later.

from loom.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.