Giter VIP home page Giter VIP logo

cics-nd / cnn-surrogate Goto Github PK

View Code? Open in Web Editor NEW
99.0 6.0 52.0 943 KB

Bayesian deep convolutional encoder-decoder networks for surrogate modeling and uncertainty quantification

Home Page: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.04.018

License: MIT License

Python 97.38% Shell 2.62%
encoder-decoder bayesian-surrogate uncertainty-quantification image-regression stein-variational-gradient-decent

cnn-surrogate's People

Contributors

nickgeneva avatar yinhaoz avatar

Stargazers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

Watchers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

cnn-surrogate's Issues

Failed to download dataset

Hello, is the dataset still available to download as i have failed to download using the command
bash ./scripts/download_dataset.sh 4225

Use of priors for weights

Hi,
thanks for the easy-to-use code!
I had a question about the use of priors for the weights when calculating the log probability to be used inside the stein gradient update equation: is that something without which things would not work in your experience? I was wondering since the stein gradient just needs us to specify a log_prob that we're interested in maximizing, and so doing svgd with just the model likelihood (wrt ground truth data) as the log_p is also correct right?
I just wanted to clarify if the weight priors are something desirable that we can choose to add t the log_p term because of desired regularisation(as specified in your accompanying paper) or if that's something essential that if not included, renders the math/theory wrong.
Thanks,
Gunshi

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    ๐Ÿ–– Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. ๐Ÿ“Š๐Ÿ“ˆ๐ŸŽ‰

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google โค๏ธ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.