closer-cohorts / archivist Goto Github PK

At present numeric answers show the answer's 'Numeric type' in the DOC view. it would be very useful, particularly in verification, if the DOC view showed the numeric answer's Description as well as its Numeric type.

In Caddies there are summary pages for various constructs - qcs, statements, condtions, etc. Hiving constructs listed by type and the information displayed in Caddies for each construct type is very useful particualrly when dong verification - for checking ID construction on all constructs, on qc summary checking qi/qg and qc ids mirror, for statements and conditions checking text and for conditions, logic. In Archivist at moment it looks like these are no longer part of how things are displayed which would be a great loss of functionality.

This is set in some of the angularjs-bootstrap code using jQuery.css an angularjs directive should be created to override this

At first look in Archivist, current view option for an instrument looks less friendly for using to listen to input in verification and for doing visual checks during review of input and verification. The Caddies DOC view presents the textual narrative in a format that is closer to the look of the questionnaires which I think makes checking more friendly and quick.

The breadcrumb paths only show when you have clicked on an item in the side bar window, and so if there are no items to select then they don’t show.

This issue is related to the task of numbering consecutive statements appearing in a given section of a questionnaire. When adding or extracting statements, the ids have to be renumbered to reflect the change. This can be time consuming to renumber all statements ids when simply adding or taking away a statement (if you've missed one out accidently or incorrectly identified something as a statement). Is there a quicker way to to complete this function without manually editing each id?

This also applies to qi's and consequently qc's.

I created a new code list and ticked the response domain option, but it has not appeared in the drop down list to use in a qi. – you have to refresh the page before it appears.

When adding a response domain to a question and there is a long code list label, it extends across the white box, and so the add option is very far right and not within the white box (it is hard to see).

If to you save a qg without a response domain, when you edit it to add it later there is no add button. You can get around it by changing the column axis to something else and back again so the add then appears.

Make the background lighter
word-wrap

Effects labels and instructions worst.

When opening multiple (web) tabs from different parts of CADDIES, the tabs are not indicative of what the webpage is about. Instead the tab label is just the prefix of the questionnaire i.e. DDi3 us2_ysc. It would therefore be quite helpful for tabs to be named after it's webpage* e.g. Conditions, Question items etc. This may reduce time taken to input and verify metadata, especially in the case of swapping between different tabs.

*Apologies for lack of technical terms, can specify upon request

When you have removed a category from a code list and then enter a new one it moves the box up to the top, when you save it has moved it back to the bottom. Also, not all the up and down buttons work when doing this.

Archivist allows you to delete a condition, which then deletes everything inside of the condition- should only delete if it is empty.

Currently to be able to perform verification to CLOSER standard, the literal text of a questionnaire has to be read out to the verifier using text-to-speach software. Archivist 4 or 5 should use the Javascript TTS API to add embedded reading out functionality.

Currently only suported by Chrome, Opera and Safari.

If there is an incorrect agency I cannot edit it once it has been created.

At the moment, the only way to see a response's type is to click through to the input page for the individual response. To facilitate both entry and verification, it would be helpful if the response type was visible next to the label name on the page that appears when you click on Reponse domain, or there was a filter (either on the Build page, or response domain page, or both) so you could see just Text or just Numeric or just Date/Time responses, or ideally both of these options.

One for an enhancement at the end of the project ....

It would be very cool and a great use case to be able to import a 3.2 fragment instance of question items downloaded from a Colectica Portal, CLOSER / MIDUS etc.

This would be a great way of showing how you could build a questionnaire from existing questions, it would need some additional fields to trap the BasedOn to provenance the variable, which would need specing out

Is there a way of distinguishing the elements more on the construct page? Currently difficult to see what everything is and what is inside a condition. The lines on the side a difficult to follow (could use more colour). Can the construct page have expand and contract buttons like the CADDIES spine view?

To be able to see where (in which questions) each category has been used.

The first time you enter a double digit as a code value it reverses the numbers so 12 changes to 21. You can change it to overwrite it.

There's a typo in the names for the fields that show up when you click through to see a datetime response. 'Datatime type:' should read 'Datetime type:'

When using the autocomplete for adding categories, the only way you can type something new and not choose an option which is already there is by clicking somewhere else. Both tab and enter select the first category on the list. Would be quicker if only the keyboard could be used.