craigsapp / bach-370-chorales Goto Github PK

Plate 12021 IIIF bounding boxes have been added to the score:

https://www.digitale-sammlungen.de/en/view/bsb11108042?page=11

Plate V.A. 10 would be useful to add if there is an IIIF source for it (This is supposed to be a reprint of plage 12021, but seems like there are some differences). And probably if it is a reprint there may be corrections from plate 12021.

Here is an earlier edition that could be added as well (2nd or 3rd edition) Leipzig : Breitkopf & Härtel, [1832]
https://www.digitale-sammlungen.de/en/view/bsb11152914?page=,1

Also the "first" edition in four volumes:

https://www.digitale-sammlungen.de/en/view/bsb11137805
https://www.digitale-sammlungen.de/en/view/bsb11137806
https://www.digitale-sammlungen.de/en/view/bsb11137807
https://www.digitale-sammlungen.de/en/view/bsb11137808

Executing make musicxml converts all files alright, except:

Processing kern/chor132.krn
Error too many grace note beams
Size is 7
Value is ][[==[[
Error: accessing invalid array location -1 Maximum is -1

My humdrum-tools were compiled from 3cf04c9. Please let me know if more information is needed.

Hi-

Chorale 35 (Gott des Himmels und der Erden) has a natural on the tenor note in m.3. It should be in front of the alto note (because of the D# in m.2).

Thanks for posting all of these! I'm using them to browse and make my own editions for sight-reading in choir.

As sugar for the user you could replace the IMSLP link in the README with this permalink that unequivocally identifies the edition without the need to search for Plate V.A. 10 https://imslp.org/wiki/Special:ReverseLookup/495149

https://www.digitale-sammlungen.de/en/view/bsb11108042?page=132

chor253 should not have a repeat sign in measure 6. Do you want me to remove it, or should I remove the written repetition (measures 5-10)? If I should remove the written repetition should I also change the measure numbers accordingly?

This is a more general question, as the edition on https://mdz-nbn-resolving.de/details:bsb11108042 seems to have minor differences compared to the edition you probably used in 2009.

Also see: https://www.digitale-sammlungen.de/de/view/bsb11137807?page=53

The line #13 now has:
*c:dor *c:dor *c:dor *c:dir

It seems the last spine is wrong, it should be *c:dor for 'dorian'

In line 129, the natural accidental seems to be written twice:
4B-] 4G 8ennXXL 2cc
Shouldn't it be?
4B-] 4G 8enXXL 2cc