Uncaught TypeError: Object # has no method 'indexOf' lux.js:16909

Looks like the remove function is treating scene as an array instead of an object. I was going to send a pull request, but I don't see a list of actors anywhere.

I'd love to see the graphing calculator working!

Since Javascript is dynamically checked, if a user passes a bad value into a function, the error might only manifest itself much further down the code. Tracking this error down is a slow and opaque problem: the error message will typically come from the innards of Facet, which will confuse users that are not intimately familiar with the library (at present, anyone but me).

The easy way to solve this problem is to add a strict layer of type-checking into every function. This works, but carries a runtime penalty, and good code pays the cost of debugging over and over again. This is not a problem if the API call is not on the application hot path, but some calls are unavoidable: anything that happens per-frame on WebGL should be considered on the hotpath, since spare cycles can be used for more features.

The easy way to solve this problem is to add a strict layer of type-checking into every function. This works, but carries a runtime penalty, and good code pays the cost of debugging over and over again. This is not a problem if the API call is not on the application hot path, but some calls are unavoidable: anything that happens per-frame on WebGL should be considered on the hotpath, since spare cycles can be used for more features. The canonical example of this type of thing is in https://github.com/cscheid/facet/blob/master/src/shade/parameter.js .

I'm leaning towards creating two sets of methods, the slow, type-checked method, and the fast, non-type-checked version.
But what's the best way to expose this in an API? Is it even hopeful to do something like this robustly and effectively?

We get literals like "NaN.0" which are nonsense.

Should review the code so that only a minimal number of global objects are exposed. Ideally, only Lux and Shade should exist. (I could put Shade inside Lux, but I think a lot of code would look bad. The same goes for vec* and mat*)

Doesn't work because ctx.parameters.width stores width in virtual pixels (or whatever the name is), not device pixels.

I've been bitten by typing Shade(x, y, z) instead of Shade.vec(x, y, z). We should either check for multiple parameters or actually just call Shade.vec() in case we get more than one parameter.

I bought the kool-aid, might as well drink it.