Updating an interaction about scobot HOT 2 CLOSED

@bevdokimov thanks I'm glad its helped people get exposed to SCORM in a Open Source capacity.

So SCOBot from memory is detecting the latency for you.

Lets see if I can dig into the setInteraction method quick -
You need a id for sure and the original timestamp is calculated based on a prior interaction to calculate the latency.

I took a look at some of the error handling here:
https://github.com/cybercussion/SCOBot/blob/master/QUnit-Tests/js/scorm/SCOBot.js#L1361

Essentially you'd want to at minimum pass the proper types. Least the way I wrote it I assumed you'd be passing a interaction object as defined there (even empty arrays and data types) so you could populate the same object. If your familiar with say MongoDB you could upsert data against a object and this method doesn't appear to manage that least how I interpret your attempting to.

So maybe that will give you a bread crumb with example to at least have a Interaction object which I believe the main reason I did it like that was to maintain journaling. Least with some of the code I'm seeing there its testing to see if you are passing an Array and if not sending a log message that an array wasn't found.
Thats not necessarily bad although flagged as a error. Its just letting you know (because it happens) you didn't specify it.

Also use SCOVerseer to evaluate your interaction data if you want to see if you are getting the result you are looking for. It may be working after all?

from scobot.

Closing this out. Let me know if you have any further issues or debugging needs.

from scobot.