Giter VIP home page Giter VIP logo

Comments (4)

hackergrrl avatar hackergrrl commented on August 16, 2024

In the future users should be able to update presets themselves, but I think we need for an admin override.

Can you elaborate on this? I could read this as meaning, local edits are doable by anyone, but if an admin pushes out a new version of the presets.. it overwrite any changes they made? Curious what you were thinking (y'know, 5 years ago :P).

from osm-p2p-db.

gmaclennan avatar gmaclennan commented on August 16, 2024

Ha! Yes, that was a long time ago! I'm thinking that changing presets should be restricted to an "admin" group, but it will likely need to be more than a single person, so that does introduce the possibility of conflicts (two admins edit the presets). We still need to figure out how to determine an "admin" in a de-centralised system. For something like this I think it would be enough to enforce the "admin" role at the front-end, e.g. anyone who is part of the project with raw access to the Mapeo Core API could theoretically edit a preset, but the UI only allows admins to do that. Similar to the way we restrict editing on mobile to observations you create - there is nothing in the backend stopping that.

from osm-p2p-db.

gmaclennan avatar gmaclennan commented on August 16, 2024

I've been thinking about how to implement any kind of admin / role in our db. One thought I had was that each device could just ignore any hypercore entries from devices that it does not consider an "admin".

from osm-p2p-db.

hackergrrl avatar hackergrrl commented on August 16, 2024

Similar to the way we restrict editing on mobile to observations you create - there is nothing in the backend stopping that.

I agree that starting here is simplest. The new invite flow for OTF incorporated an isAdmin bit I think, which could be stored locally on disk.

I've been thinking about how to implement any kind of admin / role in our db. One thought I had was that each device could just ignore any hypercore entries from devices that it does not consider an "admin".

Yeah. And then there's the Q of how to set who is an admin. I think materialized-group-auth captures this logic well.

from osm-p2p-db.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.