Handle method.basicCancel about amqp-coffee HOT 3 CLOSED

What would you want it to do? I suppose emitting an error on the consumer could work?

from amqp-coffee.

Maybe another kind or event such as 'cancel'? Error would, of course, work, but then we'll have to choose error code, structure it similarly to rabbitmq response, and this is likely undesirable

On 15 Jan 2016, at 01:53, David Barshow [email protected] wrote:

What would you want it to do? I suppose emitting an error on the consumer could work?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

from amqp-coffee.

yeah, i really hate adding random emitters, everything but errors are callback based. I think ill add the cancel listener and fall back to error if there isn't a cancel listener.

from amqp-coffee.