Doesn't Seem To Differentiate Post vs Get vs URL about express-validator HOT 10 CLOSED

I agree, if req.param() provided a way to specify from which source to extract the parameters then req.assert() should be able to handle that as well. However I can't really find the place where you got the syntax req.param('password', req.body) from. To my knowledge in express.js url-parameters take precedence over get-parameters which take precedence over post-parameters if one uses req.param(), see https://github.com/visionmedia/express/blob/master/lib/request.js#L244-258

If you do not expect any get-parameters you could use

req.query = null;

as a workaround to unset all query-parameters before doing the asserts.

So currently req.assert() somehow just behaves like the express.js-provided req.param().

Any thoughts?

from express-validator.

Yeah sorry my bad, misunderstood what I was looking at. (I guess I was trying to be optimistic.)
I've been using something similar to req.query.email = req.params.email = req.body.email; as a workaround, but it seems that req.assert() could work in a way where you pass it req.body, req.params, req.query or post, get, route and it uses that.

To me req.param() seems like a rather large security hole in it's current form for unsuspecting programmers. Ask for variables via post have them given to req.param via get. But that is just me.

from express-validator.

Yeah, I admit req.param() may be a little confusing, but as express-validator is a middleware for express.js I want to stick with the way, express.js behaves.

You can still use plain node-validator to validate just the bits that you want so you don't get confused by strange express.js magic ;)

Maybe you might consider filing an issue for express.js that addresses your concerns?

from express-validator.

Another idea would be to add something like

req.query.assert('email')
req.body.assert('email')
etc.

But I'm not sure how useful that would be if the application later still can use req.param('email')....

from express-validator.

Yeah I may go to just regular node-validator and sadly drop this, but I do understand sticking with the way expressjs handles things.

Posted here expressjs/express#622

from express-validator.

Cool, thanks for the upstream issue. Closing this one.

from express-validator.

Hmm, after I've read the issue I reopen the issue here. I'll think about some way to handle that stuff nicer in express-validator.

from express-validator.

The only thing I can think of is having it where you either pass the req.body etc. or just saying post, route, or get as a second parameter. If that is the case I can just req.body.example afterwards to get my sanitized or asserted variable. Personally my favorite thing is the easy error handling with assertions, because with my way I could basically just use node-validator I just don't get the nice assertions.

from express-validator.

#32 provides a special method checkBody for checking the body only, similar methods could be added for checkQuery and checkParams. If anyone has the need for these feel free to open a pull request for it.

from express-validator.

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

from express-validator.