Giter VIP home page Giter VIP logo

Comments (14)

rmcdermo avatar rmcdermo commented on September 4, 2024

I do not think the latest Smokeview has this problem. I use it on OSX.
Try latest and if that does not work submit an issue. Thanks.

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 5:14 AM, ajl42 [email protected] wrote:

Hi,
when I use the Mac OSX version of smoke view it doesn't group the slices
together ( picture attached ) in the multi slice menu. If I run a script it
then only selects one of the mesh slices rather than the full set. In order
to obtain the full slice, I have to select each individual slice on the
menu. On the linux version I don't find any issues. This occurs in smoke
view 5.x.x and 6.x.x on Mac OSX.
[image: screen shot 2016-11-21 at 09 59 11]
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/18465759/20478539/733c3ac4-afd2-11e6-985e-70fd6cf2bba0.png

Any help would be appreciated, many thanks,

Andy.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#120, or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AENrwX1h5GdxL2yQFxXPQhvZslqmm0Vsks5rAW8AgaJpZM4K4BBm
.

from smv.

ajl42 avatar ajl42 commented on September 4, 2024

Hi Randy,

               thanks for answering so quickly it must be my input declaration that causes this.  

I checked my input declaration *.fds file and when I specify the slices I specify the slice for each mesh
individually. The Mac version keeps track of this and that’s why I see extra slices
in the multiple slice menu. Somehow the Linux version consolidates the slices
so I don’t get the same behaviour. If I declare only one slice in my fds declaration then smoke view
works correctly on the Mac. Should this be raised as an issue?

Thanks for your help,

Andy.

On 21 Nov 2016, at 11:49, Randy McDermott [email protected] wrote:

I do not think the latest Smokeview has this problem. I use it on OSX.
Try latest and if that does not work submit an issue. Thanks.

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 5:14 AM, ajl42 [email protected] wrote:

Hi,
when I use the Mac OSX version of smoke view it doesn't group the slices
together ( picture attached ) in the multi slice menu. If I run a script it
then only selects one of the mesh slices rather than the full set. In order
to obtain the full slice, I have to select each individual slice on the
menu. On the linux version I don't find any issues. This occurs in smoke
view 5.x.x and 6.x.x on Mac OSX.
[image: screen shot 2016-11-21 at 09 59 11]
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/18465759/20478539/733c3ac4-afd2-11e6-985e-70fd6cf2bba0.png

Any help would be appreciated, many thanks,

Andy.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#120, or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AENrwX1h5GdxL2yQFxXPQhvZslqmm0Vsks5rAW8AgaJpZM4K4BBm
.


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub #120 (comment), or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3_mbK2m8FSPTgJHVDh2edIxDoIz3ks5rAYU0gaJpZM4K4BBm.

from smv.

gforney avatar gforney commented on September 4, 2024

smokeview groups slices by their location. If it finds two slices of the
same type located within some "epsilon" of the same plane then it will
group them together into a multi-slice. do you meshes have the same grid
resolution - besides user error that is the onluy reason I can think of
that would cause slice files in different meshes to be located in different
planes. If you have a solution that works and is easier (using only one
&SLCF line to specify a slice file) I would stick with that.

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:43 AM, ajl42 [email protected] wrote:

Hi Randy,

thanks for answering so quickly it must be my input declaration that
causes this.
I checked my input declaration *.fds file and when I specify the slices I
specify the slice for each mesh
individually. The Mac version keeps track of this and that’s why I see
extra slices
in the multiple slice menu. Somehow the Linux version consolidates the
slices
so I don’t get the same behaviour. If I declare only one slice in my fds
declaration then smoke view
works correctly on the Mac. Should this be raised as an issue?

Thanks for your help,

Andy.

On 21 Nov 2016, at 11:49, Randy McDermott [email protected]
wrote:

I do not think the latest Smokeview has this problem. I use it on OSX.
Try latest and if that does not work submit an issue. Thanks.

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 5:14 AM, ajl42 [email protected] wrote:

Hi,
when I use the Mac OSX version of smoke view it doesn't group the
slices
together ( picture attached ) in the multi slice menu. If I run a
script it
then only selects one of the mesh slices rather than the full set. In
order
to obtain the full slice, I have to select each individual slice on the
menu. On the linux version I don't find any issues. This occurs in
smoke
view 5.x.x and 6.x.x on Mac OSX.
[image: screen shot 2016-11-21 at 09 59 11]
<https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/
18465759/20478539/733c3ac4-afd2-11e6-985e-70fd6cf2bba0.png>

Any help would be appreciated, many thanks,

Andy.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#120, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/
AENrwX1h5GdxL2yQFxXPQhvZslqmm0Vsks5rAW8AgaJpZM4K4BBm>
.


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/
/issues/120#issuecomment-261916531>, or mute the thread <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3_
mbK2m8FSPTgJHVDh2edIxDoIz3ks5rAYU0gaJpZM4K4BBm>.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#120 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL1BRpirecNuJns90h_XhotE5EuvoKPKks5rAZ_lgaJpZM4K4BBm
.

Glenn Forney

from smv.

ajl42 avatar ajl42 commented on September 4, 2024

Hi Glenn,

              Thanks for your help.  I generally keep the same grid 

resolution for each mesh. I’m happy now I have a solution, it
keeps things very simple.

Many thanks,

Andy.

On 21 Nov 2016, at 13:54, Glenn Forney [email protected] wrote:

smokeview groups slices by their location. If it finds two slices of the
same type located within some "epsilon" of the same plane then it will
group them together into a multi-slice. do you meshes have the same grid
resolution - besides user error that is the onluy reason I can think of
that would cause slice files in different meshes to be located in different
planes. If you have a solution that works and is easier (using only one
&SLCF line to specify a slice file) I would stick with that.

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:43 AM, ajl42 [email protected] wrote:

Hi Randy,

thanks for answering so quickly it must be my input declaration that
causes this.
I checked my input declaration *.fds file and when I specify the slices I
specify the slice for each mesh
individually. The Mac version keeps track of this and that’s why I see
extra slices
in the multiple slice menu. Somehow the Linux version consolidates the
slices
so I don’t get the same behaviour. If I declare only one slice in my fds
declaration then smoke view
works correctly on the Mac. Should this be raised as an issue?

Thanks for your help,

Andy.

On 21 Nov 2016, at 11:49, Randy McDermott [email protected]
wrote:

I do not think the latest Smokeview has this problem. I use it on OSX.
Try latest and if that does not work submit an issue. Thanks.

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 5:14 AM, ajl42 [email protected] wrote:

Hi,
when I use the Mac OSX version of smoke view it doesn't group the
slices
together ( picture attached ) in the multi slice menu. If I run a
script it
then only selects one of the mesh slices rather than the full set. In
order
to obtain the full slice, I have to select each individual slice on the
menu. On the linux version I don't find any issues. This occurs in
smoke
view 5.x.x and 6.x.x on Mac OSX.
[image: screen shot 2016-11-21 at 09 59 11]
<https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/
18465759/20478539/733c3ac4-afd2-11e6-985e-70fd6cf2bba0.png>

Any help would be appreciated, many thanks,

Andy.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#120, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/
AENrwX1h5GdxL2yQFxXPQhvZslqmm0Vsks5rAW8AgaJpZM4K4BBm>
.


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/
/issues/120#issuecomment-261916531>, or mute the thread <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3_
mbK2m8FSPTgJHVDh2edIxDoIz3ks5rAYU0gaJpZM4K4BBm>.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#120 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL1BRpirecNuJns90h_XhotE5EuvoKPKks5rAZ_lgaJpZM4K4BBm
.

Glenn Forney

You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub #120 (comment), or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3_r8HNfHLtVbngEGt-y4aOrJumddks5rAaKigaJpZM4K4BBm.

from smv.

gforney avatar gforney commented on September 4, 2024

Andy,
start an issue and include a simple version of your input file that
reproduces the problem. I'll take a quick look to see if there is a
problem with the logic in smokeview for creating multi-slices.
glenn

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 9:03 AM, ajl42 [email protected] wrote:

Hi Glenn,

Thanks for your help. I generally keep the same grid
resolution for each mesh. I’m happy now I have a solution, it
keeps things very simple.

Many thanks,

Andy.

On 21 Nov 2016, at 13:54, Glenn Forney [email protected] wrote:

smokeview groups slices by their location. If it finds two slices of the
same type located within some "epsilon" of the same plane then it will
group them together into a multi-slice. do you meshes have the same grid
resolution - besides user error that is the onluy reason I can think of
that would cause slice files in different meshes to be located in
different
planes. If you have a solution that works and is easier (using only one
&SLCF line to specify a slice file) I would stick with that.

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:43 AM, ajl42 [email protected] wrote:

Hi Randy,

thanks for answering so quickly it must be my input declaration that
causes this.
I checked my input declaration *.fds file and when I specify the
slices I
specify the slice for each mesh
individually. The Mac version keeps track of this and that’s why I see
extra slices
in the multiple slice menu. Somehow the Linux version consolidates the
slices
so I don’t get the same behaviour. If I declare only one slice in my
fds
declaration then smoke view
works correctly on the Mac. Should this be raised as an issue?

Thanks for your help,

Andy.

On 21 Nov 2016, at 11:49, Randy McDermott [email protected]
wrote:

I do not think the latest Smokeview has this problem. I use it on
OSX.
Try latest and if that does not work submit an issue. Thanks.

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 5:14 AM, ajl42 [email protected]
wrote:

Hi,
when I use the Mac OSX version of smoke view it doesn't group the
slices
together ( picture attached ) in the multi slice menu. If I run a
script it
then only selects one of the mesh slices rather than the full set.
In
order
to obtain the full slice, I have to select each individual slice
on the
menu. On the linux version I don't find any issues. This occurs in
smoke
view 5.x.x and 6.x.x on Mac OSX.
[image: screen shot 2016-11-21 at 09 59 11]
<https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/
18465759/20478539/733c3ac4-afd2-11e6-985e-70fd6cf2bba0.png>

Any help would be appreciated, many thanks,

Andy.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#120, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/
AENrwX1h5GdxL2yQFxXPQhvZslqmm0Vsks5rAW8AgaJpZM4K4BBm>
.


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/
/issues/120#issuecomment-261916531>, or mute the thread
<
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3_
mbK2m8FSPTgJHVDh2edIxDoIz3ks5rAYU0gaJpZM4K4BBm>.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#120 (comment),
or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL1BRpirecNuJns90h_
XhotE5EuvoKPKks5rAZ_lgaJpZM4K4BBm>
.

Glenn Forney

You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/
/issues/120#issuecomment-261944200>, or mute the thread <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3_r8HNfHLtVbngEGt-
y4aOrJumddks5rAaKigaJpZM4K4BBm>.


You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#120 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL1BRhV68EQ8MY2lexJMsJQPKPsxAKluks5rAaTDgaJpZM4K4BBm
.

Glenn Forney

from smv.

ajl42 avatar ajl42 commented on September 4, 2024

Hi Glenn, will do thanks,

Andy.

On 21 Nov 2016, at 14:12, Glenn Forney [email protected] wrote:

Andy,
start an issue and include a simple version of your input file that
reproduces the problem. I'll take a quick look to see if there is a
problem with the logic in smokeview for creating multi-slices.
glenn

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 9:03 AM, ajl42 [email protected] wrote:

Hi Glenn,

Thanks for your help. I generally keep the same grid
resolution for each mesh. I’m happy now I have a solution, it
keeps things very simple.

Many thanks,

Andy.

On 21 Nov 2016, at 13:54, Glenn Forney [email protected] wrote:

smokeview groups slices by their location. If it finds two slices of the
same type located within some "epsilon" of the same plane then it will
group them together into a multi-slice. do you meshes have the same grid
resolution - besides user error that is the onluy reason I can think of
that would cause slice files in different meshes to be located in
different
planes. If you have a solution that works and is easier (using only one
&SLCF line to specify a slice file) I would stick with that.

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:43 AM, ajl42 [email protected] wrote:

Hi Randy,

thanks for answering so quickly it must be my input declaration that
causes this.
I checked my input declaration *.fds file and when I specify the
slices I
specify the slice for each mesh
individually. The Mac version keeps track of this and that’s why I see
extra slices
in the multiple slice menu. Somehow the Linux version consolidates the
slices
so I don’t get the same behaviour. If I declare only one slice in my
fds
declaration then smoke view
works correctly on the Mac. Should this be raised as an issue?

Thanks for your help,

Andy.

On 21 Nov 2016, at 11:49, Randy McDermott [email protected]
wrote:

I do not think the latest Smokeview has this problem. I use it on
OSX.
Try latest and if that does not work submit an issue. Thanks.

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 5:14 AM, ajl42 [email protected]
wrote:

Hi,
when I use the Mac OSX version of smoke view it doesn't group the
slices
together ( picture attached ) in the multi slice menu. If I run a
script it
then only selects one of the mesh slices rather than the full set.
In
order
to obtain the full slice, I have to select each individual slice
on the
menu. On the linux version I don't find any issues. This occurs in
smoke
view 5.x.x and 6.x.x on Mac OSX.
[image: screen shot 2016-11-21 at 09 59 11]
<https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/
18465759/20478539/733c3ac4-afd2-11e6-985e-70fd6cf2bba0.png>

Any help would be appreciated, many thanks,

Andy.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#120, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/
AENrwX1h5GdxL2yQFxXPQhvZslqmm0Vsks5rAW8AgaJpZM4K4BBm>
.


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/
/issues/120#issuecomment-261916531>, or mute the thread
<
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3_
mbK2m8FSPTgJHVDh2edIxDoIz3ks5rAYU0gaJpZM4K4BBm>.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#120 (comment),
or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL1BRpirecNuJns90h_
XhotE5EuvoKPKks5rAZ_lgaJpZM4K4BBm>
.

Glenn Forney

You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/
/issues/120#issuecomment-261944200>, or mute the thread <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3_r8HNfHLtVbngEGt-
y4aOrJumddks5rAaKigaJpZM4K4BBm>.


You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#120 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL1BRhV68EQ8MY2lexJMsJQPKPsxAKluks5rAaTDgaJpZM4K4BBm
.

Glenn Forney

You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub #120 (comment), or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3-9uY832ap3uCc7pG5W3uyNEXEnPks5rAabRgaJpZM4K4BBm.

from smv.

ajl42 avatar ajl42 commented on September 4, 2024

Hi Glenn, I’ve started an issue on the smv GitHub repo. Do I need to start one somewhere else?

Best wishes,

Andy.

On 21 Nov 2016, at 14:15, Andrew Lowe [email protected] wrote:

Hi Glenn, will do thanks,

Andy.

On 21 Nov 2016, at 14:12, Glenn Forney <[email protected] mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

Andy,
start an issue and include a simple version of your input file that
reproduces the problem. I'll take a quick look to see if there is a
problem with the logic in smokeview for creating multi-slices.
glenn

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 9:03 AM, ajl42 <[email protected] mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Glenn,

Thanks for your help. I generally keep the same grid
resolution for each mesh. I’m happy now I have a solution, it
keeps things very simple.

Many thanks,

Andy.

On 21 Nov 2016, at 13:54, Glenn Forney <[email protected] mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

smokeview groups slices by their location. If it finds two slices of the
same type located within some "epsilon" of the same plane then it will
group them together into a multi-slice. do you meshes have the same grid
resolution - besides user error that is the onluy reason I can think of
that would cause slice files in different meshes to be located in
different
planes. If you have a solution that works and is easier (using only one
&SLCF line to specify a slice file) I would stick with that.

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:43 AM, ajl42 <[email protected] mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Randy,

thanks for answering so quickly it must be my input declaration that
causes this.
I checked my input declaration *.fds file and when I specify the
slices I
specify the slice for each mesh
individually. The Mac version keeps track of this and that’s why I see
extra slices
in the multiple slice menu. Somehow the Linux version consolidates the
slices
so I don’t get the same behaviour. If I declare only one slice in my
fds
declaration then smoke view
works correctly on the Mac. Should this be raised as an issue?

Thanks for your help,

Andy.

On 21 Nov 2016, at 11:49, Randy McDermott <[email protected] mailto:[email protected]>
wrote:

I do not think the latest Smokeview has this problem. I use it on
OSX.
Try latest and if that does not work submit an issue. Thanks.

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 5:14 AM, ajl42 <[email protected] mailto:[email protected]>
wrote:

Hi,
when I use the Mac OSX version of smoke view it doesn't group the
slices
together ( picture attached ) in the multi slice menu. If I run a
script it
then only selects one of the mesh slices rather than the full set.
In
order
to obtain the full slice, I have to select each individual slice
on the
menu. On the linux version I don't find any issues. This occurs in
smoke
view 5.x.x and 6.x.x on Mac OSX.
[image: screen shot 2016-11-21 at 09 59 11]
<https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/ https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/
18465759/20478539/733c3ac4-afd2-11e6-985e-70fd6cf2bba0.png>

Any help would be appreciated, many thanks,

Andy.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#120 #120>, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/
AENrwX1h5GdxL2yQFxXPQhvZslqmm0Vsks5rAW8AgaJpZM4K4BBm>
.


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/ https://github.com/
/issues/120#issuecomment-261916531>, or mute the thread
<
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3_ https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3_
mbK2m8FSPTgJHVDh2edIxDoIz3ks5rAYU0gaJpZM4K4BBm>.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#120 (comment) #120 (comment)>,
or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL1BRpirecNuJns90h_ https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL1BRpirecNuJns90h_
XhotE5EuvoKPKks5rAZ_lgaJpZM4K4BBm>
.

Glenn Forney

You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/ https://github.com/
/issues/120#issuecomment-261944200>, or mute the thread <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3_r8HNfHLtVbngEGt- https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3_r8HNfHLtVbngEGt-
y4aOrJumddks5rAaKigaJpZM4K4BBm>.


You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#120 (comment) #120 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL1BRhV68EQ8MY2lexJMsJQPKPsxAKluks5rAaTDgaJpZM4K4BBm https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL1BRhV68EQ8MY2lexJMsJQPKPsxAKluks5rAaTDgaJpZM4K4BBm>
.

Glenn Forney

You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub #120 (comment), or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3-9uY832ap3uCc7pG5W3uyNEXEnPks5rAabRgaJpZM4K4BBm.

from smv.

gforney avatar gforney commented on September 4, 2024

that will be fine

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:02 AM, ajl42 [email protected] wrote:

Hi Glenn, I’ve started an issue on the smv GitHub repo. Do I need to start
one somewhere else?

Best wishes,

Andy.

On 21 Nov 2016, at 14:15, Andrew Lowe [email protected] wrote:

Hi Glenn, will do thanks,

Andy.

On 21 Nov 2016, at 14:12, Glenn Forney <[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

Andy,
start an issue and include a simple version of your input file that
reproduces the problem. I'll take a quick look to see if there is a
problem with the logic in smokeview for creating multi-slices.
glenn

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 9:03 AM, ajl42 <[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Glenn,

Thanks for your help. I generally keep the same grid
resolution for each mesh. I’m happy now I have a solution, it
keeps things very simple.

Many thanks,

Andy.

On 21 Nov 2016, at 13:54, Glenn Forney <[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

smokeview groups slices by their location. If it finds two slices
of the
same type located within some "epsilon" of the same plane then it
will
group them together into a multi-slice. do you meshes have the same
grid
resolution - besides user error that is the onluy reason I can
think of
that would cause slice files in different meshes to be located in
different
planes. If you have a solution that works and is easier (using only
one
&SLCF line to specify a slice file) I would stick with that.

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:43 AM, ajl42 <[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Randy,

thanks for answering so quickly it must be my input declaration
that
causes this.
I checked my input declaration *.fds file and when I specify the
slices I
specify the slice for each mesh
individually. The Mac version keeps track of this and that’s why
I see
extra slices
in the multiple slice menu. Somehow the Linux version
consolidates the
slices
so I don’t get the same behaviour. If I declare only one slice in
my
fds
declaration then smoke view
works correctly on the Mac. Should this be raised as an issue?

Thanks for your help,

Andy.

On 21 Nov 2016, at 11:49, Randy McDermott <
[email protected] mailto:[email protected]>
wrote:

I do not think the latest Smokeview has this problem. I use it
on
OSX.
Try latest and if that does not work submit an issue. Thanks.

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 5:14 AM, ajl42 <
[email protected] mailto:[email protected]>
wrote:

Hi,
when I use the Mac OSX version of smoke view it doesn't group
the
slices
together ( picture attached ) in the multi slice menu. If I
run a
script it
then only selects one of the mesh slices rather than the full
set.
In
order
to obtain the full slice, I have to select each individual
slice
on the
menu. On the linux version I don't find any issues. This
occurs in
smoke
view 5.x.x and 6.x.x on Mac OSX.
[image: screen shot 2016-11-21 at 09 59 11]
<https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/ <https://cloud.
githubusercontent.com/assets/>
18465759/20478539/733c3ac4-afd2-11e6-985e-70fd6cf2bba0.png>

Any help would be appreciated, many thanks,

Andy.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this
thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#120 <
https://github.com/firemodels/smv/issues/120>>, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/>
AENrwX1h5GdxL2yQFxXPQhvZslqmm0Vsks5rAW8AgaJpZM4K4BBm>
.


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <
https://github.com/ https://github.com/
/issues/120#issuecomment-261916531>, or mute the
thread
<
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3_ <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3_>
mbK2m8FSPTgJHVDh2edIxDoIz3ks5rAYU0gaJpZM4K4BBm>.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#120
issuecomment-261941661 <#120
issuecomment-261941661>>,
or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-
auth/AL1BRpirecNuJns90h_ <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-
auth/AL1BRpirecNuJns90h_>
XhotE5EuvoKPKks5rAZ_lgaJpZM4K4BBm>
.

Glenn Forney

You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <
https://github.com/ https://github.com/
/issues/120#issuecomment-261944200>, or mute the
thread <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-
auth/ARnD3_r8HNfHLtVbngEGt- <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-
auth/ARnD3_r8HNfHLtVbngEGt->
y4aOrJumddks5rAaKigaJpZM4K4BBm>.


You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#120 (comment)
#120 (comment)>,
or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/
AL1BRhV68EQ8MY2lexJMsJQPKPsxAKluks5rAaTDgaJpZM4K4BBm <https://github.com/
notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL1BRhV68EQ8MY2lexJMsJQPKPsxAK
luks5rAaTDgaJpZM4K4BBm>>
.

Glenn Forney

You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/
/issues/120#issuecomment-261948415>, or mute the thread <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3-
9uY832ap3uCc7pG5W3uyNEXEnPks5rAabRgaJpZM4K4BBm>.


You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#120 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL1BRu8UO8A0AAZ3umPr2edq5kf4RN90ks5rAbKAgaJpZM4K4BBm
.

Glenn Forney

from smv.

ajl42 avatar ajl42 commented on September 4, 2024

Hi Glenn,
Please find attached an example fds input file that creates my problem in smoke view. I’ve also attached two pictures of the screenhots showing the multi slice menu in smoke view, one for the Mac version and one for Linux ( Centos ) version. Thanks for the support and taking time to look at this.

Best wishes,

Andy.

On 21 Nov 2016, at 16:07, Glenn Forney [email protected] wrote:

that will be fine

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:02 AM, ajl42 [email protected] wrote:

Hi Glenn, I’ve started an issue on the smv GitHub repo. Do I need to start
one somewhere else?

Best wishes,

Andy.

On 21 Nov 2016, at 14:15, Andrew Lowe [email protected] wrote:

Hi Glenn, will do thanks,

Andy.

On 21 Nov 2016, at 14:12, Glenn Forney <[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

Andy,
start an issue and include a simple version of your input file that
reproduces the problem. I'll take a quick look to see if there is a
problem with the logic in smokeview for creating multi-slices.
glenn

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 9:03 AM, ajl42 <[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Glenn,

Thanks for your help. I generally keep the same grid
resolution for each mesh. I’m happy now I have a solution, it
keeps things very simple.

Many thanks,

Andy.

On 21 Nov 2016, at 13:54, Glenn Forney <[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

smokeview groups slices by their location. If it finds two slices
of the
same type located within some "epsilon" of the same plane then it
will
group them together into a multi-slice. do you meshes have the same
grid
resolution - besides user error that is the onluy reason I can
think of
that would cause slice files in different meshes to be located in
different
planes. If you have a solution that works and is easier (using only
one
&SLCF line to specify a slice file) I would stick with that.

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:43 AM, ajl42 <[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Randy,

thanks for answering so quickly it must be my input declaration
that
causes this.
I checked my input declaration *.fds file and when I specify the
slices I
specify the slice for each mesh
individually. The Mac version keeps track of this and that’s why
I see
extra slices
in the multiple slice menu. Somehow the Linux version
consolidates the
slices
so I don’t get the same behaviour. If I declare only one slice in
my
fds
declaration then smoke view
works correctly on the Mac. Should this be raised as an issue?

Thanks for your help,

Andy.

On 21 Nov 2016, at 11:49, Randy McDermott <
[email protected] mailto:[email protected]>
wrote:

I do not think the latest Smokeview has this problem. I use it
on
OSX.
Try latest and if that does not work submit an issue. Thanks.

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 5:14 AM, ajl42 <
[email protected] mailto:[email protected]>
wrote:

Hi,
when I use the Mac OSX version of smoke view it doesn't group
the
slices
together ( picture attached ) in the multi slice menu. If I
run a
script it
then only selects one of the mesh slices rather than the full
set.
In
order
to obtain the full slice, I have to select each individual
slice
on the
menu. On the linux version I don't find any issues. This
occurs in
smoke
view 5.x.x and 6.x.x on Mac OSX.
[image: screen shot 2016-11-21 at 09 59 11]
<https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/ <https://cloud.
githubusercontent.com/assets/>
18465759/20478539/733c3ac4-afd2-11e6-985e-70fd6cf2bba0.png>

Any help would be appreciated, many thanks,

Andy.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this
thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#120 <
https://github.com/firemodels/smv/issues/120>>, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/>
AENrwX1h5GdxL2yQFxXPQhvZslqmm0Vsks5rAW8AgaJpZM4K4BBm>
.


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <
https://github.com/ https://github.com/
/issues/120#issuecomment-261916531>, or mute the
thread
<
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3_ <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3_>
mbK2m8FSPTgJHVDh2edIxDoIz3ks5rAYU0gaJpZM4K4BBm>.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#120
issuecomment-261941661 <#120
issuecomment-261941661>>,
or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-
auth/AL1BRpirecNuJns90h_ <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-
auth/AL1BRpirecNuJns90h_>
XhotE5EuvoKPKks5rAZ_lgaJpZM4K4BBm>
.

Glenn Forney

You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <
https://github.com/ https://github.com/
/issues/120#issuecomment-261944200>, or mute the
thread <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-
auth/ARnD3_r8HNfHLtVbngEGt- <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-
auth/ARnD3_r8HNfHLtVbngEGt->
y4aOrJumddks5rAaKigaJpZM4K4BBm>.


You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#120 (comment)
#120 (comment)>,
or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/
AL1BRhV68EQ8MY2lexJMsJQPKPsxAKluks5rAaTDgaJpZM4K4BBm <https://github.com/
notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL1BRhV68EQ8MY2lexJMsJQPKPsxAK
luks5rAaTDgaJpZM4K4BBm>>
.

Glenn Forney

You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/
/issues/120#issuecomment-261948415>, or mute the thread <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3-
9uY832ap3uCc7pG5W3uyNEXEnPks5rAabRgaJpZM4K4BBm>.


You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#120 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL1BRu8UO8A0AAZ3umPr2edq5kf4RN90ks5rAbKAgaJpZM4K4BBm
.

Glenn Forney

You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub #120 (comment), or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD30GM9MdmtFz_15uwZ2JGyHLXrt-Hks5rAcHegaJpZM4K4BBm.

from smv.

gforney avatar gforney commented on September 4, 2024

I don't see the attachment

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:21 PM, ajl42 [email protected] wrote:

Hi Glenn,
Please find attached an example fds input file that creates my problem in
smoke view. I’ve also attached two pictures of the screenhots showing the
multi slice menu in smoke view, one for the Mac version and one for Linux (
Centos ) version. Thanks for the support and taking time to look at this.

Best wishes,

Andy.

On 21 Nov 2016, at 16:07, Glenn Forney [email protected] wrote:

that will be fine

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:02 AM, ajl42 [email protected]
wrote:

Hi Glenn, I’ve started an issue on the smv GitHub repo. Do I need to
start
one somewhere else?

Best wishes,

Andy.

On 21 Nov 2016, at 14:15, Andrew Lowe [email protected] wrote:

Hi Glenn, will do thanks,

Andy.

On 21 Nov 2016, at 14:12, Glenn Forney <[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

Andy,
start an issue and include a simple version of your input file that
reproduces the problem. I'll take a quick look to see if there is a
problem with the logic in smokeview for creating multi-slices.
glenn

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 9:03 AM, ajl42 <[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Glenn,

Thanks for your help. I generally keep the same grid
resolution for each mesh. I’m happy now I have a solution, it
keeps things very simple.

Many thanks,

Andy.

On 21 Nov 2016, at 13:54, Glenn Forney <
[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

smokeview groups slices by their location. If it finds two
slices
of the
same type located within some "epsilon" of the same plane then
it
will
group them together into a multi-slice. do you meshes have the
same
grid
resolution - besides user error that is the onluy reason I can
think of
that would cause slice files in different meshes to be located
in
different
planes. If you have a solution that works and is easier (using
only
one
&SLCF line to specify a slice file) I would stick with that.

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:43 AM, ajl42 <
[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Randy,

thanks for answering so quickly it must be my input
declaration
that
causes this.
I checked my input declaration *.fds file and when I specify
the
slices I
specify the slice for each mesh
individually. The Mac version keeps track of this and that’s
why
I see
extra slices
in the multiple slice menu. Somehow the Linux version
consolidates the
slices
so I don’t get the same behaviour. If I declare only one
slice in
my
fds
declaration then smoke view
works correctly on the Mac. Should this be raised as an issue?

Thanks for your help,

Andy.

On 21 Nov 2016, at 11:49, Randy McDermott <
[email protected] mailto:[email protected]>
wrote:

I do not think the latest Smokeview has this problem. I use
it
on
OSX.
Try latest and if that does not work submit an issue.
Thanks.

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 5:14 AM, ajl42 <
[email protected] mailto:[email protected]>
wrote:

Hi,
when I use the Mac OSX version of smoke view it doesn't
group
the
slices
together ( picture attached ) in the multi slice menu. If
I
run a
script it
then only selects one of the mesh slices rather than the
full
set.
In
order
to obtain the full slice, I have to select each individual
slice
on the
menu. On the linux version I don't find any issues. This
occurs in
smoke
view 5.x.x and 6.x.x on Mac OSX.
[image: screen shot 2016-11-21 at 09 59 11]
<https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/ <
https://cloud.
githubusercontent.com/assets/>
18465759/20478539/733c3ac4-afd2-11e6-985e-70fd6cf2bba0.png>

Any help would be appreciated, many thanks,

Andy.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this
thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#120 <
https://github.com/firemodels/smv/issues/120>>, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/>
AENrwX1h5GdxL2yQFxXPQhvZslqmm0Vsks5rAW8AgaJpZM4K4BBm>
.


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <
https://github.com/ https://github.com/
/issues/120#issuecomment-261916531>, or mute
the
thread
<
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3_ <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3_>
mbK2m8FSPTgJHVDh2edIxDoIz3ks5rAYU0gaJpZM4K4BBm>.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this
thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#120
issuecomment-261941661 <#120
issuecomment-261941661>>,
or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-
auth/AL1BRpirecNuJns90h_ <https://github.com/
notifications/unsubscribe-
auth/AL1BRpirecNuJns90h_>
XhotE5EuvoKPKks5rAZ_lgaJpZM4K4BBm>
.

Glenn Forney

You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <
https://github.com/ https://github.com/
/issues/120#issuecomment-261944200>, or mute the
thread <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-
auth/ARnD3_r8HNfHLtVbngEGt- <https://github.com/
notifications/unsubscribe-
auth/ARnD3_r8HNfHLtVbngEGt->
y4aOrJumddks5rAaKigaJpZM4K4BBm>.


You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#120
issuecomment-261946351
<#120 (comment)
,
or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/
AL1BRhV68EQ8MY2lexJMsJQPKPsxAKluks5rAaTDgaJpZM4K4BBm <
https://github.com/
notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL1BRhV68EQ8MY2lexJMsJQPKPsxAK
luks5rAaTDgaJpZM4K4BBm>>
.

Glenn Forney

You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <
https://github.com/
/issues/120#issuecomment-261948415>, or mute the thread
<
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3-
9uY832ap3uCc7pG5W3uyNEXEnPks5rAabRgaJpZM4K4BBm>.


You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#120 (comment),
or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/
AL1BRu8UO8A0AAZ3umPr2edq5kf4RN90ks5rAbKAgaJpZM4K4BBm>
.

Glenn Forney

You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/
/issues/120#issuecomment-261982018>, or mute the thread <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD30GM9MdmtFz_
15uwZ2JGyHLXrt-Hks5rAcHegaJpZM4K4BBm>.


You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#120 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL1BRh9hdSTi9pTSWDbm0ZrXykroOID4ks5rAdMJgaJpZM4K4BBm
.

Glenn Forney

from smv.

ajl42 avatar ajl42 commented on September 4, 2024

Hi Glenn sorry about the missing file,

                Please find attached an example fds input file that creates my problem in smoke view.  I’ve also attached two pictures of the screenhots showing the multi slice menu in smoke view, one for the Mac version and one for Linux ( Centos ) version.  Thanks for the support and taking time to look at this.

Best wishes,

Andy.

smokeviewExampleLinuxMacFDS.txt
macscreenshot
linuxscreenshot

from smv.

gforney avatar gforney commented on September 4, 2024

you have duplicate &SLCF namelists in your input file. You shouldn't have multiple PBX, PBY, or PBZ keywords specifying the same plane. ie you should have one &SLCF PBY=0.6, &SLCF PBY=0.0 , etc. FDS is outputting a slice file for each &SLCF namelist. This is confusing smokeview. You should see the correct info in the multi-lisce menu after you take out the duplicate &SLCF keywords

from smv.

ajl42 avatar ajl42 commented on September 4, 2024

Hi Glenn,

             Thanks, thats the fix and it works now.  

Thanks for your time,

Andy.

On 22 Nov 2016, at 02:38, Glenn Forney [email protected] wrote:

you have duplicate &SLCF namelists in your input file. You shouldn't have multiple PBX, PBY, or PBZ keywords specifying the same plane. ie you should have one &SLCF PBY=0.6, &SLCF PBY=0.0 , etc. FDS is outputting a slice file for each &SLCF namelist. This is confusing smokeview. You should see the correct info in the multi-lisce menu after you take out the duplicate &SLCF keywords


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub #120 (comment), or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD32JNESiGkayn1lSQOhdzIJep5-6Sks5rAlWNgaJpZM4K4BBm.

from smv.

gforney avatar gforney commented on September 4, 2024

glad that it is fixed, thanks for reporting back
glenn

from smv.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.