Comments (14)
I do not think the latest Smokeview has this problem. I use it on OSX.
Try latest and if that does not work submit an issue. Thanks.
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 5:14 AM, ajl42 [email protected] wrote:
Hi,
when I use the Mac OSX version of smoke view it doesn't group the slices
together ( picture attached ) in the multi slice menu. If I run a script it
then only selects one of the mesh slices rather than the full set. In order
to obtain the full slice, I have to select each individual slice on the
menu. On the linux version I don't find any issues. This occurs in smoke
view 5.x.x and 6.x.x on Mac OSX.
[image: screen shot 2016-11-21 at 09 59 11]
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/18465759/20478539/733c3ac4-afd2-11e6-985e-70fd6cf2bba0.pngAny help would be appreciated, many thanks,
Andy.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#120, or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AENrwX1h5GdxL2yQFxXPQhvZslqmm0Vsks5rAW8AgaJpZM4K4BBm
.
from smv.
Hi Randy,
thanks for answering so quickly it must be my input declaration that causes this.
I checked my input declaration *.fds file and when I specify the slices I specify the slice for each mesh
individually. The Mac version keeps track of this and that’s why I see extra slices
in the multiple slice menu. Somehow the Linux version consolidates the slices
so I don’t get the same behaviour. If I declare only one slice in my fds declaration then smoke view
works correctly on the Mac. Should this be raised as an issue?
Thanks for your help,
Andy.
On 21 Nov 2016, at 11:49, Randy McDermott [email protected] wrote:
I do not think the latest Smokeview has this problem. I use it on OSX.
Try latest and if that does not work submit an issue. Thanks.On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 5:14 AM, ajl42 [email protected] wrote:
Hi,
when I use the Mac OSX version of smoke view it doesn't group the slices
together ( picture attached ) in the multi slice menu. If I run a script it
then only selects one of the mesh slices rather than the full set. In order
to obtain the full slice, I have to select each individual slice on the
menu. On the linux version I don't find any issues. This occurs in smoke
view 5.x.x and 6.x.x on Mac OSX.
[image: screen shot 2016-11-21 at 09 59 11]
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/18465759/20478539/733c3ac4-afd2-11e6-985e-70fd6cf2bba0.pngAny help would be appreciated, many thanks,
Andy.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#120, or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AENrwX1h5GdxL2yQFxXPQhvZslqmm0Vsks5rAW8AgaJpZM4K4BBm
.—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub #120 (comment), or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3_mbK2m8FSPTgJHVDh2edIxDoIz3ks5rAYU0gaJpZM4K4BBm.
from smv.
smokeview groups slices by their location. If it finds two slices of the
same type located within some "epsilon" of the same plane then it will
group them together into a multi-slice. do you meshes have the same grid
resolution - besides user error that is the onluy reason I can think of
that would cause slice files in different meshes to be located in different
planes. If you have a solution that works and is easier (using only one
&SLCF line to specify a slice file) I would stick with that.
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:43 AM, ajl42 [email protected] wrote:
Hi Randy,
thanks for answering so quickly it must be my input declaration that
causes this.
I checked my input declaration *.fds file and when I specify the slices I
specify the slice for each mesh
individually. The Mac version keeps track of this and that’s why I see
extra slices
in the multiple slice menu. Somehow the Linux version consolidates the
slices
so I don’t get the same behaviour. If I declare only one slice in my fds
declaration then smoke view
works correctly on the Mac. Should this be raised as an issue?Thanks for your help,
Andy.
On 21 Nov 2016, at 11:49, Randy McDermott [email protected]
wrote:I do not think the latest Smokeview has this problem. I use it on OSX.
Try latest and if that does not work submit an issue. Thanks.On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 5:14 AM, ajl42 [email protected] wrote:
Hi,
when I use the Mac OSX version of smoke view it doesn't group the
slices
together ( picture attached ) in the multi slice menu. If I run a
script it
then only selects one of the mesh slices rather than the full set. In
order
to obtain the full slice, I have to select each individual slice on the
menu. On the linux version I don't find any issues. This occurs in
smoke
view 5.x.x and 6.x.x on Mac OSX.
[image: screen shot 2016-11-21 at 09 59 11]
<https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/
18465759/20478539/733c3ac4-afd2-11e6-985e-70fd6cf2bba0.png>Any help would be appreciated, many thanks,
Andy.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#120, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/
AENrwX1h5GdxL2yQFxXPQhvZslqmm0Vsks5rAW8AgaJpZM4K4BBm>
.—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/
/issues/120#issuecomment-261916531>, or mute the thread <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3_
mbK2m8FSPTgJHVDh2edIxDoIz3ks5rAYU0gaJpZM4K4BBm>.—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#120 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL1BRpirecNuJns90h_XhotE5EuvoKPKks5rAZ_lgaJpZM4K4BBm
.
Glenn Forney
from smv.
Hi Glenn,
Thanks for your help. I generally keep the same grid
resolution for each mesh. I’m happy now I have a solution, it
keeps things very simple.
Many thanks,
Andy.
On 21 Nov 2016, at 13:54, Glenn Forney [email protected] wrote:
smokeview groups slices by their location. If it finds two slices of the
same type located within some "epsilon" of the same plane then it will
group them together into a multi-slice. do you meshes have the same grid
resolution - besides user error that is the onluy reason I can think of
that would cause slice files in different meshes to be located in different
planes. If you have a solution that works and is easier (using only one
&SLCF line to specify a slice file) I would stick with that.On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:43 AM, ajl42 [email protected] wrote:
Hi Randy,
thanks for answering so quickly it must be my input declaration that
causes this.
I checked my input declaration *.fds file and when I specify the slices I
specify the slice for each mesh
individually. The Mac version keeps track of this and that’s why I see
extra slices
in the multiple slice menu. Somehow the Linux version consolidates the
slices
so I don’t get the same behaviour. If I declare only one slice in my fds
declaration then smoke view
works correctly on the Mac. Should this be raised as an issue?Thanks for your help,
Andy.
On 21 Nov 2016, at 11:49, Randy McDermott [email protected]
wrote:I do not think the latest Smokeview has this problem. I use it on OSX.
Try latest and if that does not work submit an issue. Thanks.On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 5:14 AM, ajl42 [email protected] wrote:
Hi,
when I use the Mac OSX version of smoke view it doesn't group the
slices
together ( picture attached ) in the multi slice menu. If I run a
script it
then only selects one of the mesh slices rather than the full set. In
order
to obtain the full slice, I have to select each individual slice on the
menu. On the linux version I don't find any issues. This occurs in
smoke
view 5.x.x and 6.x.x on Mac OSX.
[image: screen shot 2016-11-21 at 09 59 11]
<https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/
18465759/20478539/733c3ac4-afd2-11e6-985e-70fd6cf2bba0.png>Any help would be appreciated, many thanks,
Andy.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#120, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/
AENrwX1h5GdxL2yQFxXPQhvZslqmm0Vsks5rAW8AgaJpZM4K4BBm>
.—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/
/issues/120#issuecomment-261916531>, or mute the thread <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3_
mbK2m8FSPTgJHVDh2edIxDoIz3ks5rAYU0gaJpZM4K4BBm>.—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#120 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL1BRpirecNuJns90h_XhotE5EuvoKPKks5rAZ_lgaJpZM4K4BBm
.Glenn Forney
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub #120 (comment), or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3_r8HNfHLtVbngEGt-y4aOrJumddks5rAaKigaJpZM4K4BBm.
from smv.
Andy,
start an issue and include a simple version of your input file that
reproduces the problem. I'll take a quick look to see if there is a
problem with the logic in smokeview for creating multi-slices.
glenn
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 9:03 AM, ajl42 [email protected] wrote:
Hi Glenn,
Thanks for your help. I generally keep the same grid
resolution for each mesh. I’m happy now I have a solution, it
keeps things very simple.Many thanks,
Andy.
On 21 Nov 2016, at 13:54, Glenn Forney [email protected] wrote:
smokeview groups slices by their location. If it finds two slices of the
same type located within some "epsilon" of the same plane then it will
group them together into a multi-slice. do you meshes have the same grid
resolution - besides user error that is the onluy reason I can think of
that would cause slice files in different meshes to be located in
different
planes. If you have a solution that works and is easier (using only one
&SLCF line to specify a slice file) I would stick with that.On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:43 AM, ajl42 [email protected] wrote:
Hi Randy,
thanks for answering so quickly it must be my input declaration that
causes this.
I checked my input declaration *.fds file and when I specify the
slices I
specify the slice for each mesh
individually. The Mac version keeps track of this and that’s why I see
extra slices
in the multiple slice menu. Somehow the Linux version consolidates the
slices
so I don’t get the same behaviour. If I declare only one slice in my
fds
declaration then smoke view
works correctly on the Mac. Should this be raised as an issue?Thanks for your help,
Andy.
On 21 Nov 2016, at 11:49, Randy McDermott [email protected]
wrote:I do not think the latest Smokeview has this problem. I use it on
OSX.
Try latest and if that does not work submit an issue. Thanks.On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 5:14 AM, ajl42 [email protected]
wrote:Hi,
when I use the Mac OSX version of smoke view it doesn't group the
slices
together ( picture attached ) in the multi slice menu. If I run a
script it
then only selects one of the mesh slices rather than the full set.
In
order
to obtain the full slice, I have to select each individual slice
on the
menu. On the linux version I don't find any issues. This occurs in
smoke
view 5.x.x and 6.x.x on Mac OSX.
[image: screen shot 2016-11-21 at 09 59 11]
<https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/
18465759/20478539/733c3ac4-afd2-11e6-985e-70fd6cf2bba0.png>Any help would be appreciated, many thanks,
Andy.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#120, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/
AENrwX1h5GdxL2yQFxXPQhvZslqmm0Vsks5rAW8AgaJpZM4K4BBm>
.—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/
/issues/120#issuecomment-261916531>, or mute the thread
<
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3_
mbK2m8FSPTgJHVDh2edIxDoIz3ks5rAYU0gaJpZM4K4BBm>.—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#120 (comment),
or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL1BRpirecNuJns90h_
XhotE5EuvoKPKks5rAZ_lgaJpZM4K4BBm>
.Glenn Forney
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/
/issues/120#issuecomment-261944200>, or mute the thread <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3_r8HNfHLtVbngEGt-
y4aOrJumddks5rAaKigaJpZM4K4BBm>.—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#120 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL1BRhV68EQ8MY2lexJMsJQPKPsxAKluks5rAaTDgaJpZM4K4BBm
.
Glenn Forney
from smv.
Hi Glenn, will do thanks,
Andy.
On 21 Nov 2016, at 14:12, Glenn Forney [email protected] wrote:
Andy,
start an issue and include a simple version of your input file that
reproduces the problem. I'll take a quick look to see if there is a
problem with the logic in smokeview for creating multi-slices.
glennOn Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 9:03 AM, ajl42 [email protected] wrote:
Hi Glenn,
Thanks for your help. I generally keep the same grid
resolution for each mesh. I’m happy now I have a solution, it
keeps things very simple.Many thanks,
Andy.
On 21 Nov 2016, at 13:54, Glenn Forney [email protected] wrote:
smokeview groups slices by their location. If it finds two slices of the
same type located within some "epsilon" of the same plane then it will
group them together into a multi-slice. do you meshes have the same grid
resolution - besides user error that is the onluy reason I can think of
that would cause slice files in different meshes to be located in
different
planes. If you have a solution that works and is easier (using only one
&SLCF line to specify a slice file) I would stick with that.On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:43 AM, ajl42 [email protected] wrote:
Hi Randy,
thanks for answering so quickly it must be my input declaration that
causes this.
I checked my input declaration *.fds file and when I specify the
slices I
specify the slice for each mesh
individually. The Mac version keeps track of this and that’s why I see
extra slices
in the multiple slice menu. Somehow the Linux version consolidates the
slices
so I don’t get the same behaviour. If I declare only one slice in my
fds
declaration then smoke view
works correctly on the Mac. Should this be raised as an issue?Thanks for your help,
Andy.
On 21 Nov 2016, at 11:49, Randy McDermott [email protected]
wrote:I do not think the latest Smokeview has this problem. I use it on
OSX.
Try latest and if that does not work submit an issue. Thanks.On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 5:14 AM, ajl42 [email protected]
wrote:Hi,
when I use the Mac OSX version of smoke view it doesn't group the
slices
together ( picture attached ) in the multi slice menu. If I run a
script it
then only selects one of the mesh slices rather than the full set.
In
order
to obtain the full slice, I have to select each individual slice
on the
menu. On the linux version I don't find any issues. This occurs in
smoke
view 5.x.x and 6.x.x on Mac OSX.
[image: screen shot 2016-11-21 at 09 59 11]
<https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/
18465759/20478539/733c3ac4-afd2-11e6-985e-70fd6cf2bba0.png>Any help would be appreciated, many thanks,
Andy.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#120, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/
AENrwX1h5GdxL2yQFxXPQhvZslqmm0Vsks5rAW8AgaJpZM4K4BBm>
.—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/
/issues/120#issuecomment-261916531>, or mute the thread
<
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3_
mbK2m8FSPTgJHVDh2edIxDoIz3ks5rAYU0gaJpZM4K4BBm>.—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#120 (comment),
or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL1BRpirecNuJns90h_
XhotE5EuvoKPKks5rAZ_lgaJpZM4K4BBm>
.Glenn Forney
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/
/issues/120#issuecomment-261944200>, or mute the thread <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3_r8HNfHLtVbngEGt-
y4aOrJumddks5rAaKigaJpZM4K4BBm>.—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#120 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL1BRhV68EQ8MY2lexJMsJQPKPsxAKluks5rAaTDgaJpZM4K4BBm
.Glenn Forney
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub #120 (comment), or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3-9uY832ap3uCc7pG5W3uyNEXEnPks5rAabRgaJpZM4K4BBm.
from smv.
Hi Glenn, I’ve started an issue on the smv GitHub repo. Do I need to start one somewhere else?
Best wishes,
Andy.
On 21 Nov 2016, at 14:15, Andrew Lowe [email protected] wrote:
Hi Glenn, will do thanks,
Andy.
On 21 Nov 2016, at 14:12, Glenn Forney <[email protected] mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
Andy,
start an issue and include a simple version of your input file that
reproduces the problem. I'll take a quick look to see if there is a
problem with the logic in smokeview for creating multi-slices.
glennOn Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 9:03 AM, ajl42 <[email protected] mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Glenn,
Thanks for your help. I generally keep the same grid
resolution for each mesh. I’m happy now I have a solution, it
keeps things very simple.Many thanks,
Andy.
On 21 Nov 2016, at 13:54, Glenn Forney <[email protected] mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
smokeview groups slices by their location. If it finds two slices of the
same type located within some "epsilon" of the same plane then it will
group them together into a multi-slice. do you meshes have the same grid
resolution - besides user error that is the onluy reason I can think of
that would cause slice files in different meshes to be located in
different
planes. If you have a solution that works and is easier (using only one
&SLCF line to specify a slice file) I would stick with that.On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:43 AM, ajl42 <[email protected] mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Randy,
thanks for answering so quickly it must be my input declaration that
causes this.
I checked my input declaration *.fds file and when I specify the
slices I
specify the slice for each mesh
individually. The Mac version keeps track of this and that’s why I see
extra slices
in the multiple slice menu. Somehow the Linux version consolidates the
slices
so I don’t get the same behaviour. If I declare only one slice in my
fds
declaration then smoke view
works correctly on the Mac. Should this be raised as an issue?Thanks for your help,
Andy.
On 21 Nov 2016, at 11:49, Randy McDermott <[email protected] mailto:[email protected]>
wrote:I do not think the latest Smokeview has this problem. I use it on
OSX.
Try latest and if that does not work submit an issue. Thanks.On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 5:14 AM, ajl42 <[email protected] mailto:[email protected]>
wrote:Hi,
when I use the Mac OSX version of smoke view it doesn't group the
slices
together ( picture attached ) in the multi slice menu. If I run a
script it
then only selects one of the mesh slices rather than the full set.
In
order
to obtain the full slice, I have to select each individual slice
on the
menu. On the linux version I don't find any issues. This occurs in
smoke
view 5.x.x and 6.x.x on Mac OSX.
[image: screen shot 2016-11-21 at 09 59 11]
<https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/ https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/
18465759/20478539/733c3ac4-afd2-11e6-985e-70fd6cf2bba0.png>Any help would be appreciated, many thanks,
Andy.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#120 #120>, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/
AENrwX1h5GdxL2yQFxXPQhvZslqmm0Vsks5rAW8AgaJpZM4K4BBm>
.—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/ https://github.com/
/issues/120#issuecomment-261916531>, or mute the thread
<
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3_ https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3_
mbK2m8FSPTgJHVDh2edIxDoIz3ks5rAYU0gaJpZM4K4BBm>.—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#120 (comment) #120 (comment)>,
or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL1BRpirecNuJns90h_ https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL1BRpirecNuJns90h_
XhotE5EuvoKPKks5rAZ_lgaJpZM4K4BBm>
.Glenn Forney
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/ https://github.com/
/issues/120#issuecomment-261944200>, or mute the thread <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3_r8HNfHLtVbngEGt- https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3_r8HNfHLtVbngEGt-
y4aOrJumddks5rAaKigaJpZM4K4BBm>.—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#120 (comment) #120 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL1BRhV68EQ8MY2lexJMsJQPKPsxAKluks5rAaTDgaJpZM4K4BBm https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL1BRhV68EQ8MY2lexJMsJQPKPsxAKluks5rAaTDgaJpZM4K4BBm>
.Glenn Forney
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub #120 (comment), or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3-9uY832ap3uCc7pG5W3uyNEXEnPks5rAabRgaJpZM4K4BBm.
from smv.
that will be fine
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:02 AM, ajl42 [email protected] wrote:
Hi Glenn, I’ve started an issue on the smv GitHub repo. Do I need to start
one somewhere else?Best wishes,
Andy.
On 21 Nov 2016, at 14:15, Andrew Lowe [email protected] wrote:
Hi Glenn, will do thanks,
Andy.
On 21 Nov 2016, at 14:12, Glenn Forney <[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]> wrote:Andy,
start an issue and include a simple version of your input file that
reproduces the problem. I'll take a quick look to see if there is a
problem with the logic in smokeview for creating multi-slices.
glennOn Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 9:03 AM, ajl42 <[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]> wrote:Hi Glenn,
Thanks for your help. I generally keep the same grid
resolution for each mesh. I’m happy now I have a solution, it
keeps things very simple.Many thanks,
Andy.
On 21 Nov 2016, at 13:54, Glenn Forney <[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]> wrote:smokeview groups slices by their location. If it finds two slices
of the
same type located within some "epsilon" of the same plane then it
will
group them together into a multi-slice. do you meshes have the same
grid
resolution - besides user error that is the onluy reason I can
think of
that would cause slice files in different meshes to be located in
different
planes. If you have a solution that works and is easier (using only
one
&SLCF line to specify a slice file) I would stick with that.On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:43 AM, ajl42 <[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]> wrote:Hi Randy,
thanks for answering so quickly it must be my input declaration
that
causes this.
I checked my input declaration *.fds file and when I specify the
slices I
specify the slice for each mesh
individually. The Mac version keeps track of this and that’s why
I see
extra slices
in the multiple slice menu. Somehow the Linux version
consolidates the
slices
so I don’t get the same behaviour. If I declare only one slice in
my
fds
declaration then smoke view
works correctly on the Mac. Should this be raised as an issue?Thanks for your help,
Andy.
On 21 Nov 2016, at 11:49, Randy McDermott <
[email protected] mailto:[email protected]>
wrote:I do not think the latest Smokeview has this problem. I use it
on
OSX.
Try latest and if that does not work submit an issue. Thanks.On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 5:14 AM, ajl42 <
[email protected] mailto:[email protected]>
wrote:Hi,
when I use the Mac OSX version of smoke view it doesn't group
the
slices
together ( picture attached ) in the multi slice menu. If I
run a
script it
then only selects one of the mesh slices rather than the full
set.
In
order
to obtain the full slice, I have to select each individual
slice
on the
menu. On the linux version I don't find any issues. This
occurs in
smoke
view 5.x.x and 6.x.x on Mac OSX.
[image: screen shot 2016-11-21 at 09 59 11]
<https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/ <https://cloud.
githubusercontent.com/assets/>
18465759/20478539/733c3ac4-afd2-11e6-985e-70fd6cf2bba0.png>Any help would be appreciated, many thanks,
Andy.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this
thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#120 <
https://github.com/firemodels/smv/issues/120>>, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/>
AENrwX1h5GdxL2yQFxXPQhvZslqmm0Vsks5rAW8AgaJpZM4K4BBm>
.—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <
https://github.com/ https://github.com/
/issues/120#issuecomment-261916531>, or mute the
thread
<
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3_ <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3_>
mbK2m8FSPTgJHVDh2edIxDoIz3ks5rAYU0gaJpZM4K4BBm>.—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#120
issuecomment-261941661 <#120
issuecomment-261941661>>,
or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-
auth/AL1BRpirecNuJns90h_ <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-
auth/AL1BRpirecNuJns90h_>
XhotE5EuvoKPKks5rAZ_lgaJpZM4K4BBm>
.Glenn Forney
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <
https://github.com/ https://github.com/
/issues/120#issuecomment-261944200>, or mute the
thread <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-
auth/ARnD3_r8HNfHLtVbngEGt- <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-
auth/ARnD3_r8HNfHLtVbngEGt->
y4aOrJumddks5rAaKigaJpZM4K4BBm>.—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#120 (comment)
#120 (comment)>,
or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/
AL1BRhV68EQ8MY2lexJMsJQPKPsxAKluks5rAaTDgaJpZM4K4BBm <https://github.com/
notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL1BRhV68EQ8MY2lexJMsJQPKPsxAK
luks5rAaTDgaJpZM4K4BBm>>
.Glenn Forney
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/
/issues/120#issuecomment-261948415>, or mute the thread <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3-
9uY832ap3uCc7pG5W3uyNEXEnPks5rAabRgaJpZM4K4BBm>.—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#120 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL1BRu8UO8A0AAZ3umPr2edq5kf4RN90ks5rAbKAgaJpZM4K4BBm
.
Glenn Forney
from smv.
Hi Glenn,
Please find attached an example fds input file that creates my problem in smoke view. I’ve also attached two pictures of the screenhots showing the multi slice menu in smoke view, one for the Mac version and one for Linux ( Centos ) version. Thanks for the support and taking time to look at this.
Best wishes,
Andy.
On 21 Nov 2016, at 16:07, Glenn Forney [email protected] wrote:
that will be fine
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:02 AM, ajl42 [email protected] wrote:
Hi Glenn, I’ve started an issue on the smv GitHub repo. Do I need to start
one somewhere else?Best wishes,
Andy.
On 21 Nov 2016, at 14:15, Andrew Lowe [email protected] wrote:
Hi Glenn, will do thanks,
Andy.
On 21 Nov 2016, at 14:12, Glenn Forney <[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]> wrote:Andy,
start an issue and include a simple version of your input file that
reproduces the problem. I'll take a quick look to see if there is a
problem with the logic in smokeview for creating multi-slices.
glennOn Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 9:03 AM, ajl42 <[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]> wrote:Hi Glenn,
Thanks for your help. I generally keep the same grid
resolution for each mesh. I’m happy now I have a solution, it
keeps things very simple.Many thanks,
Andy.
On 21 Nov 2016, at 13:54, Glenn Forney <[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]> wrote:smokeview groups slices by their location. If it finds two slices
of the
same type located within some "epsilon" of the same plane then it
will
group them together into a multi-slice. do you meshes have the same
grid
resolution - besides user error that is the onluy reason I can
think of
that would cause slice files in different meshes to be located in
different
planes. If you have a solution that works and is easier (using only
one
&SLCF line to specify a slice file) I would stick with that.On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:43 AM, ajl42 <[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]> wrote:Hi Randy,
thanks for answering so quickly it must be my input declaration
that
causes this.
I checked my input declaration *.fds file and when I specify the
slices I
specify the slice for each mesh
individually. The Mac version keeps track of this and that’s why
I see
extra slices
in the multiple slice menu. Somehow the Linux version
consolidates the
slices
so I don’t get the same behaviour. If I declare only one slice in
my
fds
declaration then smoke view
works correctly on the Mac. Should this be raised as an issue?Thanks for your help,
Andy.
On 21 Nov 2016, at 11:49, Randy McDermott <
[email protected] mailto:[email protected]>
wrote:I do not think the latest Smokeview has this problem. I use it
on
OSX.
Try latest and if that does not work submit an issue. Thanks.On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 5:14 AM, ajl42 <
[email protected] mailto:[email protected]>
wrote:Hi,
when I use the Mac OSX version of smoke view it doesn't group
the
slices
together ( picture attached ) in the multi slice menu. If I
run a
script it
then only selects one of the mesh slices rather than the full
set.
In
order
to obtain the full slice, I have to select each individual
slice
on the
menu. On the linux version I don't find any issues. This
occurs in
smoke
view 5.x.x and 6.x.x on Mac OSX.
[image: screen shot 2016-11-21 at 09 59 11]
<https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/ <https://cloud.
githubusercontent.com/assets/>
18465759/20478539/733c3ac4-afd2-11e6-985e-70fd6cf2bba0.png>Any help would be appreciated, many thanks,
Andy.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this
thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#120 <
https://github.com/firemodels/smv/issues/120>>, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/>
AENrwX1h5GdxL2yQFxXPQhvZslqmm0Vsks5rAW8AgaJpZM4K4BBm>
.—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <
https://github.com/ https://github.com/
/issues/120#issuecomment-261916531>, or mute the
thread
<
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3_ <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3_>
mbK2m8FSPTgJHVDh2edIxDoIz3ks5rAYU0gaJpZM4K4BBm>.—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#120
issuecomment-261941661 <#120
issuecomment-261941661>>,
or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-
auth/AL1BRpirecNuJns90h_ <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-
auth/AL1BRpirecNuJns90h_>
XhotE5EuvoKPKks5rAZ_lgaJpZM4K4BBm>
.Glenn Forney
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <
https://github.com/ https://github.com/
/issues/120#issuecomment-261944200>, or mute the
thread <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-
auth/ARnD3_r8HNfHLtVbngEGt- <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-
auth/ARnD3_r8HNfHLtVbngEGt->
y4aOrJumddks5rAaKigaJpZM4K4BBm>.—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#120 (comment)
#120 (comment)>,
or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/
AL1BRhV68EQ8MY2lexJMsJQPKPsxAKluks5rAaTDgaJpZM4K4BBm <https://github.com/
notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL1BRhV68EQ8MY2lexJMsJQPKPsxAK
luks5rAaTDgaJpZM4K4BBm>>
.Glenn Forney
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/
/issues/120#issuecomment-261948415>, or mute the thread <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3-
9uY832ap3uCc7pG5W3uyNEXEnPks5rAabRgaJpZM4K4BBm>.—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#120 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL1BRu8UO8A0AAZ3umPr2edq5kf4RN90ks5rAbKAgaJpZM4K4BBm
.Glenn Forney
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub #120 (comment), or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD30GM9MdmtFz_15uwZ2JGyHLXrt-Hks5rAcHegaJpZM4K4BBm.
from smv.
I don't see the attachment
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:21 PM, ajl42 [email protected] wrote:
Hi Glenn,
Please find attached an example fds input file that creates my problem in
smoke view. I’ve also attached two pictures of the screenhots showing the
multi slice menu in smoke view, one for the Mac version and one for Linux (
Centos ) version. Thanks for the support and taking time to look at this.Best wishes,
Andy.
On 21 Nov 2016, at 16:07, Glenn Forney [email protected] wrote:
that will be fine
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:02 AM, ajl42 [email protected]
wrote:Hi Glenn, I’ve started an issue on the smv GitHub repo. Do I need to
start
one somewhere else?Best wishes,
Andy.
On 21 Nov 2016, at 14:15, Andrew Lowe [email protected] wrote:
Hi Glenn, will do thanks,
Andy.
On 21 Nov 2016, at 14:12, Glenn Forney <[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]> wrote:Andy,
start an issue and include a simple version of your input file that
reproduces the problem. I'll take a quick look to see if there is a
problem with the logic in smokeview for creating multi-slices.
glennOn Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 9:03 AM, ajl42 <[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]> wrote:Hi Glenn,
Thanks for your help. I generally keep the same grid
resolution for each mesh. I’m happy now I have a solution, it
keeps things very simple.Many thanks,
Andy.
On 21 Nov 2016, at 13:54, Glenn Forney <
[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]> wrote:smokeview groups slices by their location. If it finds two
slices
of the
same type located within some "epsilon" of the same plane then
it
will
group them together into a multi-slice. do you meshes have the
same
grid
resolution - besides user error that is the onluy reason I can
think of
that would cause slice files in different meshes to be located
in
different
planes. If you have a solution that works and is easier (using
only
one
&SLCF line to specify a slice file) I would stick with that.On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:43 AM, ajl42 <
[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]> wrote:Hi Randy,
thanks for answering so quickly it must be my input
declaration
that
causes this.
I checked my input declaration *.fds file and when I specify
the
slices I
specify the slice for each mesh
individually. The Mac version keeps track of this and that’s
why
I see
extra slices
in the multiple slice menu. Somehow the Linux version
consolidates the
slices
so I don’t get the same behaviour. If I declare only one
slice in
my
fds
declaration then smoke view
works correctly on the Mac. Should this be raised as an issue?Thanks for your help,
Andy.
On 21 Nov 2016, at 11:49, Randy McDermott <
[email protected] mailto:[email protected]>
wrote:I do not think the latest Smokeview has this problem. I use
it
on
OSX.
Try latest and if that does not work submit an issue.
Thanks.On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 5:14 AM, ajl42 <
[email protected] mailto:[email protected]>
wrote:Hi,
when I use the Mac OSX version of smoke view it doesn't
group
the
slices
together ( picture attached ) in the multi slice menu. If
I
run a
script it
then only selects one of the mesh slices rather than the
full
set.
In
order
to obtain the full slice, I have to select each individual
slice
on the
menu. On the linux version I don't find any issues. This
occurs in
smoke
view 5.x.x and 6.x.x on Mac OSX.
[image: screen shot 2016-11-21 at 09 59 11]
<https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/ <
https://cloud.
githubusercontent.com/assets/>
18465759/20478539/733c3ac4-afd2-11e6-985e-70fd6cf2bba0.png>Any help would be appreciated, many thanks,
Andy.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this
thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#120 <
https://github.com/firemodels/smv/issues/120>>, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/>
AENrwX1h5GdxL2yQFxXPQhvZslqmm0Vsks5rAW8AgaJpZM4K4BBm>
.—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <
https://github.com/ https://github.com/
/issues/120#issuecomment-261916531>, or mute
the
thread
<
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3_ <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3_>
mbK2m8FSPTgJHVDh2edIxDoIz3ks5rAYU0gaJpZM4K4BBm>.—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this
thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#120
issuecomment-261941661 <#120
issuecomment-261941661>>,
or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-
auth/AL1BRpirecNuJns90h_ <https://github.com/
notifications/unsubscribe-
auth/AL1BRpirecNuJns90h_>
XhotE5EuvoKPKks5rAZ_lgaJpZM4K4BBm>
.Glenn Forney
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <
https://github.com/ https://github.com/
/issues/120#issuecomment-261944200>, or mute the
thread <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-
auth/ARnD3_r8HNfHLtVbngEGt- <https://github.com/
notifications/unsubscribe-
auth/ARnD3_r8HNfHLtVbngEGt->
y4aOrJumddks5rAaKigaJpZM4K4BBm>.—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#120
issuecomment-261946351
<#120 (comment)
,
or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/
AL1BRhV68EQ8MY2lexJMsJQPKPsxAKluks5rAaTDgaJpZM4K4BBm <
https://github.com/
notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL1BRhV68EQ8MY2lexJMsJQPKPsxAK
luks5rAaTDgaJpZM4K4BBm>>
.Glenn Forney
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <
https://github.com/
/issues/120#issuecomment-261948415>, or mute the thread
<
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD3-
9uY832ap3uCc7pG5W3uyNEXEnPks5rAabRgaJpZM4K4BBm>.—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#120 (comment),
or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/
AL1BRu8UO8A0AAZ3umPr2edq5kf4RN90ks5rAbKAgaJpZM4K4BBm>
.Glenn Forney
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/
/issues/120#issuecomment-261982018>, or mute the thread <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD30GM9MdmtFz_
15uwZ2JGyHLXrt-Hks5rAcHegaJpZM4K4BBm>.—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#120 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL1BRh9hdSTi9pTSWDbm0ZrXykroOID4ks5rAdMJgaJpZM4K4BBm
.
Glenn Forney
from smv.
Hi Glenn sorry about the missing file,
Please find attached an example fds input file that creates my problem in smoke view. I’ve also attached two pictures of the screenhots showing the multi slice menu in smoke view, one for the Mac version and one for Linux ( Centos ) version. Thanks for the support and taking time to look at this.
Best wishes,
Andy.
smokeviewExampleLinuxMacFDS.txt
from smv.
you have duplicate &SLCF namelists in your input file. You shouldn't have multiple PBX, PBY, or PBZ keywords specifying the same plane. ie you should have one &SLCF PBY=0.6, &SLCF PBY=0.0 , etc. FDS is outputting a slice file for each &SLCF namelist. This is confusing smokeview. You should see the correct info in the multi-lisce menu after you take out the duplicate &SLCF keywords
from smv.
Hi Glenn,
Thanks, thats the fix and it works now.
Thanks for your time,
Andy.
On 22 Nov 2016, at 02:38, Glenn Forney [email protected] wrote:
you have duplicate &SLCF namelists in your input file. You shouldn't have multiple PBX, PBY, or PBZ keywords specifying the same plane. ie you should have one &SLCF PBY=0.6, &SLCF PBY=0.0 , etc. FDS is outputting a slice file for each &SLCF namelist. This is confusing smokeview. You should see the correct info in the multi-lisce menu after you take out the duplicate &SLCF keywords
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub #120 (comment), or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARnD32JNESiGkayn1lSQOhdzIJep5-6Sks5rAlWNgaJpZM4K4BBm.
from smv.
glad that it is fixed, thanks for reporting back
glenn
from smv.
Related Issues (20)
- Texture map not being applied to bingeom HOT 11
- Clipping of vector slice results crashes smokeview HOT 14
- Keyboard shortcut for anti-aliasing still in popup help HOT 5
- Accuracy of volumetric renderer HOT 4
- IOsmoke.c Foget "break"? HOT 2
- Scene clipping works only for first selected viewpoint HOT 6
- Terrain shows both input and cfaces in geometry HOT 6
- Smokeview fails to open HOT 5
- vent not displayed HOT 11
- error smokeview HOT 1
- Smokeview seg faults on case using WUI "bulk density files" HOT 2
- smokevie question HOT 4
- Problem with PBZ slice menu HOT 25
- smokeview problem with the loading of Isosurface HOT 5
- Start Smokeview window on active monitor HOT 8
- Grid orientation effect in volume rendering of HRRPUV HOT 4
- Temperature slice colobar retains level set color bar if loaded after level set slice HOT 5
- GEOM BNDF not showing correct bounds HOT 8
- Hiccup in slice file with restart case HOT 2
- CFAST Visualization possible temperature colorbar error HOT 10
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from smv.