Updating package dev tools about universal_pathlib HOT 4 CLOSED

@ap--,

I had previously made these changes in a branch and just need to separate them out. I can certainly skip them if it would just create pointless extra maintenance burden, but hopefully the changes are reasonable and helpful. I appreciate and respect your time and effort, so I am happy to defer to your opinion. For now, I'll plan to submit the changes, and you can feel free to close them if they are not helpful.

from universal_pathlib.

Having these separated in a branch would be great ❤️

I opened a discussion in the fsspec/cookiecutter-fsspec repo to see if we can help with creating the template, so that more people will benefit from the work.

My guess is that there's gonna be common ground like i.e. ci workflows, using pre-commit etc...

from universal_pathlib.

So it looks like we should use https://github.com/iterative/py-template as a base and move from there. The added benefit would be, that if the fsspec cookiecutter would eventually use a similar template, we could use https://github.com/cruft/cruft to keep all that development stack updated and in line with other fsspec projects.

from universal_pathlib.