Real->complex and complex->real about gpyfft HOT 3 OPEN

Dear Vincent,

thanks for your hint, you are right, for an out-of-place complex->real transform, where both in- and output arrays are provided by the user, the real=True keyword should not be necessary (only for an inplace transform).

Real<->complex transforms are a late addition and still lack tests, I did not yet dare to fiddle around with the interface.

Gregor

from gpyfft.

Is there any case where the real keyword is used beside real<->complex transforms ? Can I submit a PR deprecating this keyword ?
Thanks, Vincent

from gpyfft.

I just saw the inline-real2real branch. No deprecation then ? But may be useful to recognize the complex hermitian->real transform without the keyword. Could inline real2real also be recognized automatically from having in_array.dtype=np.float* and out_array=None ?

from gpyfft.