ghaerr / agg-2.6 Goto Github PK
View Code? Open in Web Editor NEWAGG Anti-Grain Geometry Library
AGG Anti-Grain Geometry Library
The README.md states the following:
"AGG 2.6, along with the official Sourceforge AGG project, is based off of AGG 2.4, which is dual licensed by either a Modified BSD License, or an Anti-Grain Geometry Public License. These licenses allow for free use in commercial software.
There exists an AGG 2.5 that was created with a GNU GPL License, with no other changes from 2.4. The AGG 2.5 version is not included here nor in the Sourceforge repositories.
There remains a separate license for the General Polygon Clipper (GPC) code, which is free only in non-commercial software. However, GPC is not an obligatory part of AGG and can be easily removed."
However, it looks like one source file in the repo is actually taken from AGG 2.5 and covered by the GNU GPL. agg-src/src/platform/sdl2/agg_platform_support.cpp contains the following header:
// Anti-Grain Geometry (AGG) - Version 2.5
// A high quality rendering engine for C++
// Copyright (C) 2002-2006 Maxim Shemanarev
// Copyright (C) 2004 Mauricio Piacentini (SDL Support)
// Contact: [email protected]
// [email protected]
// http://antigrain.com
//
// AGG is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
// modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
// as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
// of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
Can that file be somehow converted to Modified BSD License / Anti-Grain Geometry Public License to make the licensing consistent and uniform across the entire repo (with the exception of the aforementioned General Polygon Clipper (GPC) code)?
Use Github Pages publish documentation and website directly from github itself. You just need a separate branch for that.
First of all: thanks for maintaining (?) a version of this awesome library,
Just to be sure tho: Since this work is based on the 2.4 version it is licensed under a BSD License, right ?
If so, is there any way to make this a bit more clear in this repository by any chance ?
Compiling the code with clang's -Wimplicit-fallthrough
reveals ~5 cases where fallthroughs are not explicitly marked (example). Are these bugs where break
should have been used or are they intentional? If they are intentional, can they be marked with [[fallthrough]]
?
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
๐ Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
A PHP framework for web artisans
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. ๐๐๐
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
Google โค๏ธ Open Source for everyone.
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
Data-Driven Documents codes.
China tencent open source team.