Clarify license about editablecell HOT 6 CLOSED

@gnab suggested MIT. 👎 from me. @espenh whadda u think?

from editablecell.

@jstclair No fan of MIT? Or was it supposed to be thumps up?

from editablecell.

Oops, thumbs up! 👍

On 1. des. 2014, at 20.26, Ole Petter Bang [email protected] wrote:

@jstclair No fan of MIT? Or was it supposed to be thumps up?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

from editablecell.

Is beerware still a thing..?

I guess the only thing that's important for me is that Statkraft can easily use and contribute to editableCell, and that seems to be the case with MIT 👍

from editablecell.

Cool cool. I'll add a license file and close this ASAP. Thanks to you both - I guess you knew that all contributors have to agree to a license change (or in this case, addition)?

@gnab any other people we have to ask first?

On 1. des. 2014, at 22.27, Espen Halvorsen [email protected] wrote:

Is beerware still a thing..?

I guess the only thing that's important for me is that Statkraft can easily use and contribute to editableCell, and that seems to be the case with MIT

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

from editablecell.

Nope, we are the only users, so just go ahead and add it :)

from editablecell.