A two-level morphological analyzer for Turkish.

This is not an official Google product.

This implementation is composed of three layers:

• Lexicons:

  This layer includes wide-coverage Turkish lexicons which are manually annotated and validated for part-of-speech and morphophonemic irregularities. They are intended to be used in building Turkish natural language processing tools, such as morphological analyzers. The set of base lexicons that we provide includes annotated lexical items for 47,202 words. The tagsets and the annotation scheme are described in the lexicon annotation guidelines.

• Morphotactics:

  This layer includes a set of FST definitions which are implemented in a custom format which is similar to AT&T FSM format (only difference being that we can use strings as state names and input/output labels for each transition instead of integers). With each of these FSTs we define the suffixation patterns and the morpheme inventories together with their corresponding output morphological feature category-value pairs for a given part-of-speech. Overall morphotactic model and the morphological feature category-value tagsets are described in the morphotactic model guidelines.

• Morphophonemics:

  This layer includes a set of Thrax grammars, where each implements a standalone morphophonemic process (such as vowel harmony, vowel drop, consonant voicing and consonant drop and so on). Composition of the exported FSTs defined in these Thrax grammars yield the morphophonemic model of Turkish.

The first level of the morphological analysis is implemented by the morphophonemic model, which takes a Turkish word and transforms it into the intermediate representation. The output of the first level is all possible hypotheses of word stem annotations with morphophonemic irregularities followed by the meta-morphemes that correspond to the suffixes that are realized in the surface form.

Input: affında
Output: af"+SH+NDA

Lexicon entries and morphotactic FST definitions are composed and compiled into a single FST which acts as the second level of the morphological analysis, namely the morphotactic model. Morphotactic model takes the intermediate tape as the input and transforms it to all possible human-readable morphological analyses that can be generated from the hypotheses generated by the first level.

Input: af"+SH+NDA
Output: (af[NN]+[PersonNumber=A3sg]+Hn[Possessive=P2sg]+NDA[Case=Loc])+[Proper=False]

See Interpreting Human-Readable Morphological Analysis section for a description of such human-readable morphological analysis.

To morphologically parse a word, simply run below from the project root directory.

bazel run -c opt scripts:print_analyses -- --word=[WORD_TO_PARSE]

This will morphologically parse the input word against the two-level morphological analyzer and output a set of human-readable morphological analysis, as such:

bazel run -c opt scripts:print_analyses -- --word=geldiğinde
> Morphological analyses for the word 'geldiğinde':
> (gel[VB]+[Polarity=Pos])([NOMP]-DHk[Derivation=PastNom]+[PersonNumber=A3sg]+Hn[Possessive=P2sg]+NDA[Case=Loc]+[Copula=PresCop]+[PersonNumber=V3pl])+[Proper=False]
> (gel[VB]+[Polarity=Pos])([NOMP]-DHk[Derivation=PastNom]+[PersonNumber=A3sg]+Hn[Possessive=P2sg]+NDA[Case=Loc]+[Copula=PresCop]+[PersonNumber=V3pl])+[Proper=True]
> (gel[VB]+[Polarity=Pos])([NOMP]-DHk[Derivation=PastNom]+[PersonNumber=A3sg]+Hn[Possessive=P2sg]+NDA[Case=Loc]+[Copula=PresCop]+[PersonNumber=V3sg])+[Proper=False]
> (gel[VB]+[Polarity=Pos])([NOMP]-DHk[Derivation=PastNom]+[PersonNumber=A3sg]+Hn[Possessive=P2sg]+NDA[Case=Loc]+[Copula=PresCop]+[PersonNumber=V3sg])+[Proper=True]
> (gel[VB]+[Polarity=Pos])([NOMP]-DHk[Derivation=PastNom]+[PersonNumber=A3sg]+SH[Possessive=P3sg]+NDA[Case=Loc]+[Copula=PresCop]+[PersonNumber=V3pl])+[Proper=False]
> (gel[VB]+[Polarity=Pos])([NOMP]-DHk[Derivation=PastNom]+[PersonNumber=A3sg]+SH[Possessive=P3sg]+NDA[Case=Loc]+[Copula=PresCop]+[PersonNumber=V3pl])+[Proper=True]
> (gel[VB]+[Polarity=Pos])([NOMP]-DHk[Derivation=PastNom]+[PersonNumber=A3sg]+SH[Possessive=P3sg]+NDA[Case=Loc]+[Copula=PresCop]+[PersonNumber=V3sg])+[Proper=False]
> (gel[VB]+[Polarity=Pos])([NOMP]-DHk[Derivation=PastNom]+[PersonNumber=A3sg]+SH[Possessive=P3sg]+NDA[Case=Loc]+[Copula=PresCop]+[PersonNumber=V3sg])+[Proper=True]
> (gel[VB]+[Polarity=Pos])([VN]-DHk[Derivation=PastNom]+[PersonNumber=A3sg]+Hn[Possessive=P2sg]+NDA[Case=Loc])+[Proper=False]
> (gel[VB]+[Polarity=Pos])([VN]-DHk[Derivation=PastNom]+[PersonNumber=A3sg]+Hn[Possessive=P2sg]+NDA[Case=Loc])+[Proper=True]
> (gel[VB]+[Polarity=Pos])([VN]-DHk[Derivation=PastNom]+[PersonNumber=A3sg]+SH[Possessive=P3sg]+NDA[Case=Loc])+[Proper=False]
> (gel[VB]+[Polarity=Pos])([VN]-DHk[Derivation=PastNom]+[PersonNumber=A3sg]+SH[Possessive=P3sg]+NDA[Case=Loc])+[Proper=True]

If the input string is not accepted as a Turkish word, morphological analyzer outputs an empty result.

bazel run -c opt scripts:print_analyses -- --word=foo
> 'foo' is not accepted as a Turkish word

An example output human-readable morphological analysis is as follows;

Input Word (evlerindekilerin = those that belongs to ones in their homes):

bazel run -c opt scripts:print_analyses -- --word=evlerindekilerin

Sample Output Morphological Analysis String:

(ev[NN]+[PersonNumber=A3sg]+lArH[Possessive=P3pl]+NDA[Case=Loc])([PRF]-ki[Derivation=Pron]+lAr[PersonNumber=A3sg]+[Possessive=Pnon]+NHn[Case=Gen])+[Proper=False]

Human-readable morphological analyses can be decomposed into parts:

• Inflectional groups:

  Each human-readable morphological analysis is composed of inflectional groups. An inflectional group is a sub-word span, and it is created by affixation of a derivational morpheme. Inflectional group analyses are enclosed in parenthesis. Above example contains two inflectional groups:

  • (ev[NN]+[PersonNumber=A3sg]+lArH[Possessive=P3pl]+NDA[Case=Loc])
  • ([PRF]-ki[Derivation=Pron]+lAr[PersonNumber=A3pl]+[Possessive=Pnon]+NHn[Case=Gen])

• Word stem:

  First inflectional group contains the word stem (e.g. ev is the root form for the above example input word evlerindekilerin).

• Analysis of morphemes:

  Within each inflectional group meta-morphemes and their corresponding morphological feature category-value tags are separated with either + or - delimiters. (e.g. +[PersonNumber=A3sg], +lArH[Possessive=P3pl], -ki[Derivation=Pron], etc.). Strings that are immediate followers of the delimiters + or - are the meta-morphemes (e.g. NDA is the meta-morpheme in morpheme analysis +NDA[Case=Loc]). Morphological feature category-value tags are enclosed in brackets right after the meta-morphemes (e.g. Case is the feature category and Loc is feature value in morpheme analysis +NDA[Case=Loc]).

• Part-of-speech:

  Part-of-speech tag of each inflectional group is the first bracketed tag of the inflectional group (e.g. NN is the part-of-speech of the first inflectional group and PRF is for the second inflectional group).

• Inflectional vs. Derivational morphemes:

  Meta-morphemes that are separated with + delimiter do not create a new inflectional group. They are inflectional morphemes (e.g. +[PersonNumber=A3sg], +NDA[Case=Loc], +[Possessive=Pnon], etc.). Meta-morphemes that are separated with - delimiter create a new inflectional group. They are the derivational morphemes (e.g. -ki[Derivation=Pron]). Therefore, first meta-morpheme in an inflectional group always follows the delimiter -, but not +.

• Surface realization of inflections:

  Some meta-morphemes are not realized in the surface form. These meta-morphemes do not correspond to a span of characters in the input word. For them we do not output any meta-morpheme in the morpheme analysis (e.g. +lArH[Possessive=P3pl] and +NDA[Case=Loc] are realized in the surface form, thus they have explicit meta-morphemes lArH and NDA in their morpheme analysis. However, +[PersonNumber=A3sg] and +[Possessive=Pnon] are not realized in the surface form, therefore only morphological feature category-value tags are output for them in their morpheme analysis).

• Surface realization of derivations:

  Derivational morphemes must always realize in the surface form. They always correspond to a span of characters in the input word. Therefore, we always output non-empty meta-morphemes in the corresponding morpheme analysis of derivational morphemes. Meaning that no zero-derivations are allowed in the morphotactic model.

• Proper noun analysis:

  An optional proper noun feature analysis is output at the end of each inflectional group (e.g. +[Proper=False] which follows the second inflectional group). Proper noun feature category can take two values True or False. If it is specified as True, the inflectional group that it follows is considered to be a part of a proper noun. This feature is used to capture the internal structure of proper nouns that are composed of multiple words (e.g. for multi-word movie names the true part-of-speech and morphological feature of words that compose a multi-word movie name can be annotated, while marking the fact that they are part of a proper noun using this feature).

  Proper noun feature analysis is omitted for some of the inflectional groups to have a compact representation and to minimize the number of morphological analyses generated by the morphological analyzer. In such cases, proper noun feature analysis of an inflectional group applies to all preceding inflectional groups that does not have one (e.g. first inflectional group of the above example inherits its proper noun feature analysis Proper=False from the second inflectional group).

We also provide a Python API that can be used to morphologically analyze Turkish words, generate Turkish word forms from morphological analyses, parse human-readable morphological analyses into protobuf messages, validate their structural well-formedness and to generate human-readable analyses from them. You can see some example use cases in //examples.

If you are using Bazel, you can depend on this repository as an external dependency of your project by adding the following to your WORKSPACE file:

git_repository(
  name = "google_research_turkish_morphology",
  remote = "https://github.com/google-research/turkish-morphology.git",
  tag = "{version-tag}",
)

Then, you can simply use @google_research_turkish_morphology//turkish_morphology:analyze (or other modules of the API) as a dependecy of your relevant py_library or py_binary BUILD targets.

The API is also available on PyPi. To install the latest release from PyPi, run:

python3 -m pip install turkish-morphology

To install from source, run below from the project root directory (preferably within a Python virtual environment):

bazel build //...
bazel-bin/setup install

To build and run the morphological analyzer install Bazel version 5.0.0 and Python 3.9. All other intrinsic dependencies will be imported, built and taken care of by Bazel according to the WORKSPACE setup throughout the first invocation of the morphological analyzer runtime. If you are installing from PyPi, you need pip.

If you use or discuss the code, data or tools from this repository in your work, please cite:

Öztürel, A., Kayadelen, T. & Demirşahin, I (2019, September). A syntactically expressive morphological analyzer for Turkish. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Finite-State Methods and Natural Language Processing (pp. 65-75).

@inproceedings{
    title = "A Syntactically Expressive Morphological Analyzer for Turkish",
    author = "\"{O}zt\"{u}rel, Adnan and Kayadelen, Tolga and Demir\c{s}ahin,
        I\c{s}{\i}n",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Finite-State
        Methods and Natural Language Processing",
    month = "23--25" # sep,
    year = "2019",
    address = "Dresden, Germany",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W19-3110",
    pages = "65--75",
}

Unless otherwise noted, all original files are licensed under an Apache License, Version 2.0.