i40-tools / i40kg Goto Github PK
View Code? Open in Web Editor NEWContains the development for the Industry 4.0 standards knowledge graph (I40KG). Its current collaborative development is driven by VoCol - http://vocol.iais.fraunhofer.de/sto/
Contains the development for the Industry 4.0 standards knowledge graph (I40KG). Its current collaborative development is driven by VoCol - http://vocol.iais.fraunhofer.de/sto/
To keep a consistent naming. Next, update the readme.
These type of properties should have rdfs:range
as xsd:anyURI
, therefore the individuals that contain these properties should be fixed.
The documentation provided for dcterms:hasVersion is quoted below.
"Has Version: A related resource that is a version, edition, or adaptation of the described resource.
Notes: Dublin Core: This term is intended to be used with non-literal values as defined in the DCMI Abstract Model (http://dublincore.org/documents/abstract-model/). As of December 2007, the DCMI Usage Board is seeking a way to express this intention with a formal range declaration."
This is intended to be used with a non-literal value but I don't think it is defined as of now. My suggestion was to have our own sto:hasEdition Probaby just as a float value as of now.
The name of the instance should be shortened, Instead of this, having something like IEC_60050
.
More properties for the class sto:TechnicalCommittee should be added.
Regarding sto:hasEdition
, please have a look at #33
We need to decide on this. Do we use the year of Publication or the Parts number
The main aim is to understand the standard domain in order to improve the current modeling of the STO ontology. The OPC UA standard is the basis for this understanding.
TO/DOs
Create:
Could you please improve the readme and provide a description of what is the ontology about. Its links in the web, i.e., VoCol, LOV, version, the other ontologies that are reused, etc?
The class sto:Standard is now described by means of an individual. Thus, there should be investigated an option to switch to OWL2 in this case.
Many technical specifications and standards have ICS which is used for classifying standards and normative documents in databases, libraries, etc. It is a hierarchical classification which consists of three levels, e.g. ICS 25.040.40. Level 1 covers 40 fields of activity in standardization, and there are sub-divided group in level 2 and level 3.
Please use this document to accomplish this task.
B2MML is the XML implementation of ISA 95. Check https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B2MML
Target Concern Please check this out
A modeling example with OPC UA (IEC 62541)
sto:IEC_62541 sto:hasClassification sto:SCADALevel;
sto:SCADALevel a sto:StandardClassification;
sto:SCADALevel sto:isDescribedIn sto:ISA95;
sto:ISA95 a sto:StandarizationInitiative.
sto:IEC_62541 sto:hasClassification sto:Communication;
sto:Communication a sto:StandardClassification;
sto:Communication sto:isDescribedIn sto:RAMI40;
sto:RAMI40 a sto:StandarizationInitiative.
Recently I noticed that some of the hierarchy classes in the STO have different names but seem to describe same things, e.g. rami:LifecycleStatus, rami:LifeCycle_Status and rami:Lifecycle_Status. Therefore, I propose to conduct a careful revision of the classification names and decide on some uniformed naming in each case.
Below, there is a full list of classes which names seemed suspicious for me:
sto:Product
sto:Prodcut
rami:LifecycleStatus
rami:Lifecycle_Status
rami:LifeCycle_Status
rami:Asst
rami:Asset
rami:Assest
rami:safety
rami:Safety
rami:Communication
rami:Communications
rami:ConditionMonitoring
rami:Conditional_Monitoring
rami:AdminShellGeneral
rami:GeneralAdminShell
rami:WorkCenter
rami:Work_Centers
Can anybody help me with the meaning and the source of information for the value of the property "has Classification"?
We want to represent that the document for standard is in a certain language but dcterms:Language and dcterms:LinguisticSystem are dead ends. dcterms:Language just provides "Recommended best practice is to use a controlled vocabulary such as RFC 4646 [RFC4646]."
There is a 'Null' entity in the ontology:
<https://w3id.org/i40/sto#>
For me, it looks like the combined leftovers of several changes/deletions.
There are two (minor) conflicts in the master branch:
https://github.com/i40-Tools/StandardOntology/blob/4218e3304be0aa9d6276bca76137a73820b36aa4/sto.ttl#L2465
https://github.com/i40-Tools/StandardOntology/blob/4218e3304be0aa9d6276bca76137a73820b36aa4/sto.ttl#L3601
The class ISO_42010_ArchitectureDescription is declared as owl:equivalentClass
to the sto:StandardizationFramework
, @sebbader, could you please explain which is the rationale behind this?
To check how we can improve the modeling with the PROV ontology.
Annotation properties should be removed or improved, e.g., internal ones sto:edition
and external ones like skos:prefLabel
The Organization Instances, e.g., MIIT should be linked the Country they belong.
Which is described here - http://23.96.237.142/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/MIL-STD-31000A-released-on-ASSIST-3-13-2013.pdf
The basic is to have an rdfs:label
and rdfs:comment
for each one of the classes and properties like in this example.
This document page 72.
What makes then similar and what different, in terms of OWL properties and axioms, from Standards and Technical Specifications?
The ideal way to do it is by using Protégé before pushing. But even after that, you should check with VoCol to see the errors. For example, as you can check here there is an error in the current version. So please fix the error.
This is a quite important relation for the domain
https://www.isa.org/intech/20160403/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OobhzbQoUnA
As of now, We do not have some property representing the sub-parts of a standard.
For example, This instance of a standard is talking about part 27 of the standard IEC 60255. We need to represent this meaningfully in the schema.
We have the property sto:hasEdition to deal with different versions of the same standard.
Unless there is a specific reason, there should not exist individuals which type is only owl:NamedIndividual
as in this example. The individuals should always contain an rdf:type
declaring which class they belong.
I have realized that StandardPart is not a Subclass of Standard and it seems to me like it should be but I might be wrong.
Some standards has an information called TRF ( Test Report Form). This TRF is a publication type and has basic details like publication date, edition etc. For example this standard has a TRF.
Just a sample how TRF template may look like :
Follow a similar procedure to the one described in #1 for this without highlighting a specific relation.
Between IEC61850 and IEC61499 described here
For example, MTConnect, which is a quite important standard for I4.0 is described in this video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Whsx924LiUk
To add a diagram and an example of the ontology to the readme page. This ontology can be used as a reference - https://github.com/HajoRijgersberg/OM
NIST concepts should not be part of the STO ontology. If the NIST Ontology does not exist then we should create a rather small ontology to represent this but never include so many concepts in the STO ontology, e.g., here.
Property sto:hasPages has error in its' range. In some instances,
^^xsd:int is missing.
The range of dcterms:license
is the class dcterms:LicenseDocument
. Values used with this property have to be instances of the class LicenseDocument
and therefore non-literal values as in the following example.
1 - Create an instance of the license.
sto:GPLv2 a dcterms:LicenseDocument ;
rdfs:comment "Published under Open Content License." ;
skos:prefLabel "OCL 1.0" ;
rdfs:seeAlso <https://opcfoundation.org/license/gpl.htm> .
2 - Link the standard with the created instance by using the dcterms:license
property.
sto:IEC_62541 dcterms:license sto:GPLv2 ;
Licenses of standards MUST
be changed in this way.
After the changes in the ontology this should be done to keep it up to date in LOV.
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
A PHP framework for web artisans
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
Data-Driven Documents codes.
China tencent open source team.