imreifoun / philosopher Goto Github PK

42 NETWORK :

The Dining Philosophers problem is a classic synchronization problem in

computer science that demonstrates issues with resource allocation and deadlock avoidance in a concurrent system. It was originally formulated by Edsger Dijkstra.

The problem involves a group of philosophers sitting around a circular table with a bowl of rice and a single chopstick placed between each pair of adjacent philosophers. Each philosopher alternates between two activities: thinking and eating. To eat, a philosopher needs both the chopstick to their left and the chopstick to their right.

The challenge arises when multiple philosophers attempt to eat simultaneously, potentially leading to a deadlock situation. If each philosopher tries to acquire the chopstick to their right, for example, they will hold onto their left chopstick indefinitely, preventing others from acquiring the required resources and causing a deadlock.

To solve the Dining Philosophers problem, various synchronization techniques can be applied, such as using threads or processes. Here's a simple solution using threads and a mutual exclusion mechanism like semaphores:

Assign a semaphore to each chopstick, representing its availability.

Each philosopher is represented by a thread. The thread will repeatedly perform the following actions:Think: The philosopher releases both chopsticks and thinks for a while.

Pick up chopsticks: The philosopher tries to acquire the chopsticks by acquiring the semaphores associated with each chopstick. If any of the semaphores are unavailable, the philosopher waits.

Eat: Once the philosopher has both chopsticks, they eat for a while.

Put down chopsticks: The philosopher releases both chopsticks by releasing the associated semaphores.

To avoid deadlock, a key insight is to ensure that at most one philosopher can be eating at the same time. One way to achieve this is by introducing a maximum limit on the number of philosophers allowed to hold chopsticks simultaneously. For example, if there are N philosophers, the limit can be set to N-1.

Additionally, the order in which philosophers attempt to acquire chopsticks can be controlled to prevent circular waiting. For instance, if every odd philosopher picks up their left chopstick first and every even philosopher picks up their right chopstick first, the circular dependency is broken.

By carefully implementing these rules and synchronization mechanisms, the Dining Philosophers problem can be effectively solved, ensuring that each philosopher gets a chance to eat without causing deadlocks or resource starvation.