Dynamic libraries slower than Jellycon about jellyfin-kodi HOT 4 OPEN

This is more or less expected at this point. Jellycon has seen a bunch of optimizations around dynamic library loading since that's the only way it has to display server contents. This addon hasn't seen those same improvements since it's primarily designed to be used with the metadata/database sync method. It's been on the todo list forever, but just a lack of time/interest from somebody willing to dig into it. And since they both behave very differently behind the scenes, it's unfortunately not as easy as just copying that code over to this client.

from jellyfin-kodi.

That makes a lot of sense. Is there any concerns for running both addons? Use this one for writing to the tv and movies database and then use Jellycon on the same Kodi installation for some dynamic libraries that don’t conform to the tv and movie libraries?

EDIT: as a side question, is one of the plugins considered more stable than the other?

from jellyfin-kodi.

@mcarlton00 just curious if there any concerns for running both addons at the same time? And is one of the plugins considered more stable than the other?

from jellyfin-kodi.

Nope, both are separate codebases and namespaces and don't conflict in any way. I'm not sure either of them can be considered better/more stable. I personally primarily use jellycon just because I don't want to deal with the database sync. It largely comes down to personal preference.

from jellyfin-kodi.