jessesiu / annotometer Goto Github PK

We need to be more cunning with the scoring mechanism this year. 1 point for adding anything is too simplistic., especially if we add WikiData. The people at wikidata are runing a competition as ISCB next year and these are their rules:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Computational_Biology/ISCB_competition_announcement_2016
worthwhile considering restricting the pages that can be edited, not just for wikidata but also restricting the targets for the other tools too.

Discussion points:
1 - iCLiKVAL : Is it possible to detect manual vs bot/automated annotations for any given user? If so, should we weight the scores for each, say 3 points for manual annotations, 1 for automated?
2 - Hypothes.is : Should we encourage discussions within documents by adding scores for those? Is 1 point per annotation fair? or should it be 1 point per N (20) characters added?
3 - Idea's how to score WikiData? 1 point per minor edit, 1 point per N characters added? but what about edits removing characters? should translations count with the same weight? lots more to discuss with regards to wikidata.
4 - Are there any other tools we could/should include?

Need to look into additional tools that could be included in the annotometer scores. The only one that springs to mind immediately is WikiData.
They allow searching of particular usernames to see what that person has done, e.g. look what I've been upto on there:
https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?limit=50&title=Special%3AContributions&contribs=user&target=Only1chunts&namespace=&tagfilter=&year=2016&month=-1