Hi,
you missed the variable 'breaker' while copying parts of underscore.js. This causes physics to fail in browsers that do not support the native forEach function.

if (i in obj && iterator.call(context, obj[i], i, obj) === breaker) return;

What about add width & height to particles? Beside changes in distance calculation, what other changes would be required?

Hello,

I think I have an issue, but I'd like to test with a built version of source code. I imagine you just run r.js on the src, but I was wondering if you could include build instructions with configuartion so my built source code looks exactly like yours does.

I poked around the repo and I don't see anything.

Thanks.

hi,

ive started using your Physics lib to take advantage of the spring functionality and because its so light
weight. normally ive used box2d which has the ability to set the bounds so the particles can be contained within the screen.

what do you recommend as being the best way of containing particles within the screen with Physics?

just thought id ask first in case you have a good solution to this...

cheers in advance!

Hi Jono, I was wondering if it would be possible to combine this with twoJS? I am just getting started with these libraries - and JS development for that matter - and I would love to know if this would be possible!

Thanks!
I

It would be great to be able to use this as a generic physics engine in any Javascript context, not just one where 'window' is defined. Currently I'm not aware of a way to do that.