kleinzcy / sassnet Goto Github PK

Hello, I am very sorry to disturb you. First of all, thank you very much for your excellent work, and I have a question. Your experiments were done on 3D images, and they have excellent results. I would like to ask you if this SDF map will work on 2D images, and I feel that this distance map should also work on 2D images, right? I hope you can answer me, thank you very much!

Your work is very good.I am very eager to download the data you use in your work.But the data can no longer be downloaded from the official website.Would you please share it with me?

Dear author：

Hi, Thanks for your great work in 《Shape-aware Semi-supervised 3D SemanticSegmentation for Medical Images》!

This article has benefited me a lot.

I am writing to you this time mainly to think about the code you are requesting for a comparative experiment.

DAP、 ASDNet 、TCSE

I can't find the relevant code on the Internet, so I'm very much looking forward to getting your comparative experiment code.

Looking forward to hearing from you, I wish you all the best.

RT.

emm...how could i get the high-quality SDM predictions on the labeled set?

Hi, thanks for your reply, I meet a question in the code, can you help,
num_classes = 2, but during training, the input class number is n_classes=num_classes-1:
net = VNet(n_channels=1, n_classes=num_classes-1, normalization='batchnorm', has_dropout=True)
Can you tell me why do this operation?
Many thanks, waiting for your reply.

Dear author：

Hi, Thanks for your great work! I am interested in your work.

Sorry to disturb you.I have some questions. I downloaded the "2018 Atrial Segmentation Challenge COMPLETE DATASET",and then used the "la_heart_processing.py" file to process the "Training Set", and put in in the corresponding directory，and the file “train_gan_sdfloss” work on, training success. But when I test with the train model "iter_6000.pth", the result showed :average metric is [ 0.18091923 0.10030632 53.18094769 23.59822443]. If I test with your "best.pth" it can get the same result as your paper showed.

Can you give me some answers? Thanks

Best wish!

Dear author,

I ran the baseline framework Vnet (highlights in picture below) based on the 8 label supervised protocol, and find that it is far behind the result on your table.

What I have is: 75.4014 61.832541 9.92698021 33.91709438.
I'm wondering whether you have this supervised result from the Bayesian VNet, or from your model (i.e., with the assistance of the discriminator).

kind regards,