Giter VIP home page Giter VIP logo

rails-form_tag-readme's Introduction

Rails form_tag

Rails Forms

Welcome to the world of Rails forms, which give users the ability to submit data into form fields. This can be used for: creating new database records, building a contact form, integrating a search engine field, and pretty much every other aspect of the application that requires user input. When it comes to forms in Rails, you will discover that you will have the flexibility to utilize:

  • Built-in form helper methods
  • Plain HTML form elements

This lesson is going to begin by integrating HTML form elements and then slowly start refactoring the form using Rails methods. It would be very easy to integrate form helpers (and we could have our form working in a few minutes). However, fully understanding what Rails is doing behind the scenes is more important than getting the form working right away. We're going to build the system from the ground up. When we're finished, you should be able to understand all of the processes that are necessary in order to process forms in an application properly and securely.

Note: For the next few labs, we're not going to use mass assignment; instead we'll assign each attribute individually. For example, instead of Student.create(params[:students]) we'll write Student.create(first_name: params[:first_name], last_name: params[:last_name]) and name our fields in the view files without the "student" preface. We'll discuss why in the upcoming reading on Strong Params.

Rendering the Form View

Today we'll be giving the user the ability to create a new post in our BlogFlash application. Let's first create a Capybara spec to ensure that going to posts/new takes us to our form. If you think back to the Rails URL Helpers lesson, we know that we don't need to hard-code the route into our tests any longer. Let's use the standard RESTful convention of new_post_path for the route helper name:

# spec/features/post_spec.rb

require 'rails_helper'

describe 'new post' do
  it 'ensures that the form route works with the /new action' do
    visit new_post_path
    expect(page.status_code).to eq(200)
  end
end

As expected, this results in a failure saying that we don't have a new_post_path method, so let's create that in our routes.rb file:

resources :posts, only: [:index, :new]

Now it gives this failure: The action 'new' could not be found for PostsController. To correct this, let's add a new action in PostsController:

def new
end

Lastly, it says we're missing a template. Let's create app/views/posts/new.html.erb. Now that our routing test is passing, let's add a matcher spec to ensure that the template is properly displaying HTML on the new post page:

# spec/features/post_spec.rb

require 'rails_helper'

describe 'new post' do

  ...

  it 'renders HTML in the /new template' do
    visit new_post_path
    expect(page).to have_content('Post Form')
  end
end

Running this spec gets a matcher error. We can get this passing by adding <h3>Post Form</h3> to the new.html.erb view template.

Building the form in HTML

Our first pass at the form will be in plain HTML. In this reading, we're not concerned with creating any records in the database. Our focus is on the form process. We'll simply be printing out the submitted form params on the show page.

Let's create a spec for this. It's going to take a while for this to pass since we're going to be spending some time on the HTML creation process, but it's a good practice to ensure all new features are tested before the implementation code is added.

As you are updating the code, make sure to test it out in the browser – don't just rely on the tests. It's important to see the errors in both the tests and the browser since you'll want to become familiar with both types of failure messages.

# spec/features/post_spec.rb

require 'rails_helper'

describe 'new post' do

  ...

  it "displays a new post form that redirects to the index page, which then contains the submitted post's title and description" do
    visit new_post_path
    fill_in 'post_title', with: 'My post title'
    fill_in 'post_description', with: 'My post description'

    click_on 'Submit Post'

    expect(page.current_path).to eq(posts_path)
    expect(page).to have_content('My post title')
    expect(page).to have_content('My post description')
  end
end

This fails for obvious reasons. Let's follow the TDD process, letting the failures help build our form. The first error says that Capybara can't find the form field post_title. To fix that, let's create an HTML form in the new.html.erb view template:

<form>
  <label>Post title:</label><br>
  <input type="text" id="post_title" name="post[title]"><br>

  <label>Post description:</label><br>
  <textarea id="post_description" name="post[description]"></textarea><br>

  <input type="submit" value="Submit Post">
</form>

<%= params.inspect %>

The name attributes in each input should look pretty familiar by now –– they're good ole' nested hashes. Just like Sinatra, Rails takes the user input entered into form fields and stores it in the params hash. The name attribute for a given input field is used as the key within params at which the entered data is stored. For instance, the input entered into the "Post title:" field in the above form would be stored as the value of params[:post][:title]. Traditionally, Rails apps use that model[attribute] syntax for name attributes (e.g., post[title]). We'll talk more about that in a later lesson.

You'll also notice that we're printing out params to the page. Until we set up the form action, clicking Submit Post won't actually redirect to a page on which the input values will be visible, but we'd still like to verify that the params hash is being populated correctly.

If we run the tests again, we'll see that Capybara expected submitting the form to redirect it to /posts, but instead it found itself back on /posts/new. Capybara was able to fill in the form elements and click Submit Post, but we need to update the form tag with an action attribute:

<form action="<%= posts_path %>">

Now the form redirects to /posts. However, we also need to add a method attribute so that the application knows that we are submitting form data via the POST HTTP verb:

<form action="<%= posts_path %>" method="POST">

If you open up the browser and submit the form, you will get the following routing error: No route matches [POST] "/posts". We need to draw a create route so that the routing system knows what to do when a POST request is sent to the /posts resource:

# config/routes.rb

resources :posts, only: [:index, :new, :create]

If you run rake routes, you'll see we now have a posts#create action:

  Prefix Verb URI Pattern          Controller#Action
   posts GET  /posts(.:format)     posts#index
         POST /posts(.:format)     posts#create
new_post GET  /posts/new(.:format) posts#new

Running the spec tests again leads to an 'unknown action' error: The action 'create' could not be found for PostsController. Let's add a create action in PostsController and have it create a new Post object with the values from params and then redirect to the index page:

def create
  Post.create(title: params[:post][:title], description: params[:post][:description])
  redirect_to posts_path
end

If you run the Rails server, navigate to the posts/new page, fill in the title and description form elements, and click submit, you will find a new type of error:

InvalidAuthenticityToken

Which leads us to a very important part of Rails forms: CSRF.

Note: If you are seeing an error along the lines of Cannot render console from (<IP address here>)! Allowed networks: 127.0.0.1, ::1, 127.0.0.0/127.255.255.255 you'll want to add this code to config/environments/development.rb, and not config/application.rb, so it is only applied in your development environment.

class Application < Rails::Application
  config.web_console.whitelisted_ips = '<IP address here>'
end

What is CSRF?

"CSRF" stands for: Cross-Site Request Forgery. Instead of giving a boring explanation of what happens during a CSRF request, let's walk through a real-life example of a Cross-Site Request Forgery hack:

  1. You go to your bank website and log in. After checking your balance, you open up a new tab in the browser and go to your favorite meme site.

  2. Unbeknownst to you, the meme site is actually a hacking site that has scripts running in the background as soon as you land on their page.

  3. One of the scripts on the site hijacks the banking session that's open in the other browser tab and submits a form request to transfer money to their account.

  4. The banking form can't tell that the form request wasn't made by you, so it goes through the process as if you were the one who made the request.

One site making a request to another site via a form is the general flow of a Cross-Site Request Forgery. Rails blocks this from happening by default by requiring that a unique authenticity token be submitted with each form. This authenticity token is stored in the session and can't be hijacked by hackers: it performs a match check when the form is submitted, and it will throw an error if the token isn't there or doesn't match.

To fix this ActionController::InvalidAuthenticityToken error, we can integrate the form_authenticity_token helper into the form as a hidden field:

<form action="<%= posts_path %>" method="POST">
  <label>Post title:</label><br>
  <input type="text" id="post_title" name="post[title]"><br>

  <label>Post description:</label><br>
  <textarea id="post_description" name="post[description]"></textarea><br>

  <input type="hidden" name="authenticity_token" value="<%= form_authenticity_token %>">
  <input type="submit" value="Submit Post">
</form>

If we refresh the posts/new page, fill out the form, and click Submit Post, the browser should load the index view with our newly-created post's title and description in a bulleted list. All of the spec tests should now be passing, and our form is functional. However, this is probably one of the ugliest and least-elegant Rails forms that has ever existed, so let's do some refactoring.

Using form helpers

ActionView, a sub-gem of Rails, provides a number of helper methods to assist with streamlining view template code. Specifically, we can use ActionView methods to improve our form! Let's start by integrating a Rails form_tag element. Open the new.html.erb file and replace our old form code with the following:

<%= form_tag posts_path do %>
  <label>Post title:</label><br>
  <input type="text" id="post_title" name="post[title]"><br>

  <label>Post description:</label><br>
  <textarea id="post_description" name="post[description]"></textarea><br>

  <input type="hidden" name="authenticity_token" value="<%= form_authenticity_token %>">
  <input type="submit" value="Submit Post">
<% end %>

Next, we'll replace that hidden authenticity token input field with a Rails hidden_field_tag:

<%= form_tag posts_path do %>

  ...

  <%= hidden_field_tag :authenticity_token, form_authenticity_token %>
  <input type="submit" value="Submit Post">
<% end %>

If we run the tests again, we'll see that they're all still passing. Let's take a look at the HTML generated by our Rails ActionView methods. Navigate to the posts/new page in the browser, and use the Dev Tools to inspect the elements. You should see HTML that looks like this:

<form action="/posts" accept-charset="UTF-8" method="post">
  <input name="utf8" type="hidden" value="&#x2713;" /><input
    type="hidden"
    name="authenticity_token"
    value="zkOjrjTG8Lxn0CF8Lt/kFIgWdYyY3NTMbwh+Q9kPX1NrYztgq0GZNCjLFavBXka1Y5QhNjDlhX+dzQoZMzUjOA=="
  />
  <label>Post title:</label><br />
  <input type="text" id="post_title" name="post[title]" /><br />

  <label>Post description:</label><br />
  <textarea id="post_description" name="post[description]"></textarea><br />

  <input
    type="hidden"
    name="authenticity_token"
    id="authenticity_token"
    value="7SuubeJGbqfm4rO+F5VTS6Wl1SNCTGOr/mrYZKOQLbtICzajfcEHL6n5h2n4FPHqTieBmep1MhgMr6w+SapR0A=="
  />
  <input type="submit" value="Submit Post" />
</form>

The form_tag Rails helper generates a form withe the POST method by default, and it automatically renders the HTML that we were writing by hand before.

Note: We can explicitly specify what HTTP verb to use for the form_tag if we want something other than POST. For example if we wanted a GET request instead:

<%= form_tag posts_search_path, method: :get do %>

The form_tag method also automatically generates the necessary authenticity token, so we can remove the now-redundant hidden_field_tag.

Next, let's integrate some other form helpers to let Rails generate the input elements for us. For this form, we'll be using a text_field_tag and a text_area_tag and passing each the corresponding name attribute as a symbol. It's important to keep in mind that form helpers aren't magic –– they're simply Ruby methods that accept arguments, such as the name attribute and any additional parameters related to the form's elements. In addition to updating the form fields, we'll also replace the HTML tag for the submit button with a submit_tag.

<%= form_tag posts_path do %>
  <label>Post title:</label><br>
  <%= text_field_tag :'post[title]' %><br>

  <label>Post description:</label><br>
  <%= text_area_tag :'post[description]' %><br>

  <%= submit_tag "Submit Post" %>
<% end %>

Let's check out the raw HTML all these helper methods generate for us:

<form action="/posts" accept-charset="UTF-8" method="post">
  <input name="utf8" type="hidden" value="&#x2713;" /><input
    type="hidden"
    name="authenticity_token"
    value="vq9SMVNk0CjwgZmYomFRhwbo5dfu7tI/2FiR7jOtlVgbj8r/zOO5oL+arU9N4PMm7WqxbUbXg4wqneW02ZfpMw=="
  />
  <label>Post title:</label><br />
  <input type="text" name="post[title]" id="post_title" /><br />

  <label>Post description:</label><br />
  <textarea name="post[description]" id="post_description"></textarea><br />

  <input type="submit" name="commit" value="Submit Post" />
</form>

Run the spec tests one last time to verify that everything is still passing. You now know how to build a Rails form from scratch and refactor it using Rails form helper methods. Nice work!

rails-form_tag-readme's People

Contributors

annjohn avatar danielseehausen avatar dependabot[bot] avatar drakeltheryuujin avatar franknowinski avatar ihollander avatar jasonpaulso avatar jordanhudgens avatar lizbur10 avatar maxwellbenton avatar mendelb avatar meryldakin avatar pletcher avatar rrcobb avatar victhevenot avatar

Stargazers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

Watchers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

rails-form_tag-readme's Issues

Student needs to run rails generate rspec:install

The lab says to create a test file, but you'll get an error that indicates 'rails helper' isn't found unless you run rails generate rspec:install in the terminal. Also the file path the lab says to create for the tests is specs/features/post_spec.rb, however when you do run rails generate rspec:install, your path will be spec/features/post_spec.rb -- spec without the "s" on the end.

Two ways to fix this would be:

  1. Add the necessary files to the lab, so when you clone the lab, you get them
  2. Direct the student to run rails generate rspec:install in the terminal

Thank you.

Cannot render console from (<IP address here>)! Allowed networks: 127.0.0.1, ::1, 127.0.0.0/127.255.255.255

Got this error upon submit rather than the authentication token error.

Entering config.web_console.whitelisted_ips = (IP address here) while the server was running seemed to fix it and get me to the authentication error (although the server still complains in the IDE's console about the request).

Unsure if others will have this issue, running OS X 10.9.5. Issue presented in both Chrome 57 and FireFox 52.

spec is set for end of lab result instead of middle result

In the middle of the codealong they ask you to put post_title and post_description into both the id and name tags in order to get the lab to pass. But the spec has been premade for the end of the lab when you're using form helpers. so you have to put title and description into the id/name tags in the middle of the lab to get the spec to pass as it should.

Spec test works for final refactored version, but fails earlier versions.

This portion of the lab has you edit the spec file as it refers to the ID attribute.
In the early parts of the lab, the tests fail because spec file as written, is trying to find either an ID= "title" or content="title (both work). The code in the early parts of the lab, show ID = post_title and content="post_content" (both fail). If you change either of them to "title" or "content" respectively, the tests pass.

So, we should either change the earlier code examples in the lab to "test" and/or "content" and then remove the last section where you correct the spec file, or remove the "correcting of the spec file" pasted below:

This is all working on the page, however it broke some of our tests since it streamlined the ID attribute in the form, so let's update our spec:
fill_in 'title', with: "My post title"
fill_in 'description', with: "My post description"
Running the specs again and now we're back to everything passing and you now know how to build a Rails form from scratch and refactor it using Rails form helper methods, nice work!

rake was not running properly, neither was rspec

I cloned this lab and tried to run learn/bundle exec rspec and it would not return anything.
It seems like there was an issue with the gem version maybe. I deleted the gemfile.lock and reran bundle install and this corrected the issue. I can run rspec and rake now.

no learn specs

this readme is walking through as if there are tests in the code along, but there are no learn specs

Not Showing as Completed Lab in Curriculum List or Profile

Hey there,
This lab is showing as complete on my "green flag", but is not checking off under the Curriculum drop down menu or on my profile page. I know you're having issues with lessons not showing as complete, so I wanted to message about this error. I'm attaching screenshots.

Best,
A

Screen Shot 2019-05-03 at 2 02 44 PM

Screen Shot 2019-05-03 at 2 02 57 PM

Screen Shot 2019-05-03 at 2 04 43 PM

Screen Shot 2019-05-03 at 2 05 43 PM

Tests already complete - do not match in some sections of lesson

Since the tests are already completely written when this lab is forked and cloned down, the middle sections of the lab fail. The tests are looking for a field named "description" but when we manually write out the HTML, the lab says to name it "post_description" and the test fails. In the lab it says the test passed but it didn't.

Could be resolved by including no test with the lesson and letting the student write the test as the lab goes along.

Hope that helps!

I can't get the first test to pass--rspec and routes issue

When I do the first spec and putresources :posts, only: [:index, :new] in my routes.rb file, the initial error doesn't go away, even though "rails routes" shows that the route new_post is there:
`Failures:

  1. new post ensures that the form route works with the /new action
    Failure/Error: visit new_post_path

    NameError:
    undefined local variable or method `new_post_path' for #RSpec::ExampleGroups::NewPost:0x00007f9d5fc656c0

    ./spec/post_spec.rb:5:in block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'

My tech coach couldn't solve this, I wonder if the answer is here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/21478384/rspec-test-custom-route-path-results-in-not-recognized-by-rspec-undefined-loc.
"You cannot access named route from your tests unless you add this to spec_helper.rb

Rspec.configure do |config|
  config.include Rails.application.routes.url_helpers
  ...
end

"

Putting that line in spec_helper just gives me an error, however. NameError:
uninitialized constant Rails.

This is difficult to follow along

It would be helpful to have the rails generate rspec:install command in the beginning of the lab to create the spec directory. In the lab it also refers to the specs folder, but it should be singular spec if you use the first command.

These labs where you are copy and pasting in the spec and the code are always extremely confusing. I always have to ask help from a coach on the "ReadMe" lessons because they are almost always missing a step or are confusing. If you want to teach specs, have their own module. I think everyone would benefit from it.

-A

typo?

before the title Building the form in HTML.
Running this spec gets a matcher error. We can get this passing by adding <h3>Post Form</h3> to the new.html.erb view template.
should be:

>Post Form<


h3 => does not have the closing and the opening tags

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.