As a Director, I can select the motions from the dropdown list and they will appear below in the order I selected them as opposed to some reordering according to disruptiveness

As a Director, I can ask for 1 delegate for, 1 delegate against, and 1 delegate neutral, and then having to repeat the call instead of just asking for all for speakers, all against speakers, and all neutral speakers and then reordering them or sorting them myself

Majority is currently resolution specific and is stored against the ResolutionData type.

I want to be able to set the majority for resolutions on a committee level on setup screen, such that all resolutions inherit this majority when they're created. Changing this committee-wide majority should not change the majority of all existing resolutions. I should reserve the right to override the majority for a specific resolution.

Resolutions are created here.

I just started using MUNcoordinated and I really want to use it for the conference that my school is hosting. I think that the idea of delegates being able to add amendments and add themselves to a speaker's list is cool. However, when I try to use the link, the other person is able to change all details of the committee. Is there any way that the shareable link can keep delegates from editing committee details?

Ideally, every new motion is more disruptive than the last. If a 15 minute moderated caucus is proposed, the next one to be added should be 16 minutes by default.

They shouldn't. Loading spinners should be confined to elements that are actually loading.

• Fixed /committee/<ID>
• Fixed /committee/<ID>/files
• Fixed /committee/<ID>/stats

• For all intents and purposes, NGOs and observers
• NGOs contribute do not contribute to thresholds
• Observers contribute only to procedural thresholds, but not operative thresholds, but cannot vote on procedural matters

The feature I'm requesting
This project would be much more accessible and easier to use with a well-written install/deployment guide

How it can be implemented
A detailed guide on how to install/deploy MunCoordinated
(and an accompanying docker image?😋)

Additional information
I'd be more than happy to help and contribute by writing a deployment README if you'd share some basic setup instructions

Hi Max!

Just wondering if there's a way to change what the 'present' and 'voting' options do on the Setup tab.

In SMUN, we operate on a system where present = cannot vote on substantive matters (i.e. automatically counted as an abstention in the reso voting system), while voting = can vote on substantive matters (i.e. can vote for/against/abstain in reso voting).

Is there a way to change this setting and implement it?

Thank you so much!!

A director did not know how to yield to delegates, saying that they "could not yield to delegates out of order". When inquired about how they were doing it instead, they said that they were "using the remove button". Upon being informed about the [Yield] button, they expressed surprise.

Possible fix: Further user testing is required to ensure yielding is intuitive.

Acceptance criteria

• The amount of time a timer has been running since last reset can be derived from the timer's state
• Timers require 1 click to start
• Timers on all machines start ticking together
• Timers require 1 click to stop
• Timers on all machines stop ticking
• Unmounted timers receive the correct time remaining / elapsed / ticking status when mounted

They starting counting down from the set value immediately after they have mounted.

In Singapore (unsure about other MUN circuits), voting rules are such that abstentions do not negate the 2/3s majority.

Hence, if there are 10 delegates in the council. 7 abstain, and 2 vote in favour and one vote against, the substantive vote should still pass.

However, currently muncoordinated includes the 7 abstentions in calculating the 2/3s majority. Hence, instead of the results being 2/3=the vote passes, the software thinks it's 2/10 which causes the vote to fail.

It would be good if there is an option for abstentions to not factor into the pass/fail of the vote, as we do it in Singapore.

Thank you so so much!

Options

Link

Are there anyway that I can set a topic for unmoderated caucus?
In Taiwan, we generally will have a topic for unmod.
Hope to get an answer :)

Hey, we're a school-MUN trying to deploy our own instance of MUNcoordinated for our MUN and we're having trouble after the initial firebase deploy - we downloaded the .zip and deployed to a firebase project (https://mc-pleasework.firebaseapp.com)

The page just shows up as blank, after several attempts. We love muncoordinated and we were hoping you might be able to help us get this working!

As a Director, I can operate the software normally as long as no one else is viewing the link to the committee whilst if someone else is viewing it on their own device, to view changes I must refresh the page.

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...]

Describe the solution you'd like
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.

Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

When creating a committee, along with selecting the Name, Topic, Chairpeople, and Conference, a Committee Type:

• ECOSOC
• UN General Assembly
• UNHCR
• UNHRC
• UNICEF
• UN Security Council
• WHO Executive Board

etc.

By selecting this, with the exception of the General Assembly, the committee members will be prepopulated in the Setup screen and the appropriate Majority rules will be set for the resolution (if #82) is implemented.

Example from https://session.muncommand.com/setup

Hi,
I can't delete a created committee.
Is it even possible to do so?

Could you implement a check that if the delegates are not marked as 'present' in Setup, that they will not be allowed to be added to the speakers' list. Thanks!

Possible fix: Disable the [+] button if the user attempts to add a duplicate country

As a director, I would like to be able to restrict my delegates to one choice of option.

Some ROPs use the term 'motion to move into direct voting procedures' to end debate on a resolution and vote on it. This is different from the 'motion to close debate' which is to table the topic as a whole.

I was wondering if it was possible to insert that motion into the motion dropdown list. Preferably, this would also mentions which resolution is being voted upon and allow, if passed, the chair to press a button to directly go to the voting page on the specific resolution (but that is secondary).

Thank you so so much for being so active in the development and support of this software!!

Users are confused as immediate movement of the motion when its disruptiveness is change leads users to assume that it has been deleted. Furthermore, moving while changing time means the user has to track the motion as it moves across the screen.

Suggested fix: Motion data is only saved once fields have lost focus.

Reproduction

1. Click the Name: field of "new caucus" form.
2. Press a single key

Acceptance criteria

• Focus is not lost after pressing a single key

Fields and buttons should be fluid or centered.

We are hosting a historical committee where we will have states like USSR, East and West Germany, and Czechoslovakia. I was hoping that these and more historical states could be added to the Setup list with the correct flags.

Hi,

Since all delegates who are voting are also present, is it possible to do that when I press on voting on the Admin page, it will mark present automatically?

Thanks.

This makes the project look unmaintained.

We should:

1. Remove it
   OR
2. Update it with new conferences
3. Figure out some way of allowing conferences to submit their logo

Hi! I'm chairing Singapore MUN and I wish to delete resolutions/caucuses as I want to keep the interface clean.

Is there a way to delete the reso/caucus? Thanks!

I would like to use Muncoordinated for a simulation of the Security Council and would like to know if it is possible to change the thresholds so as to reflect the requirement of nine affirmative votes for a resolution to pass. Thank you so much for creating this tool! :)

As drop-downs do not show flags next to their selections, only their options.

To fix: Place a flag to the immediate left of a country dropdown, indicating the selected country

As a Director, I can only "approve and delete" "open moderated caucus" and only "delete" "open unmoderated caucus"

Number under 'abstentions' and 'no' is wrong.
Should be '0' but is '1'.

As a Director, I can select delegates' stances of for, against, or neutral whilst not being able to reorder them if a delegate wants to be moved down the list unless I press clear