met4fof / met4fof-smartupunit Goto Github PK

View Code? Open in Web Editor NEW

2.0 2.0 5.0 60.96 MB

This is the micro controller code generated by PTB WG 1.71 in WP1 of the EMPIR project.

C 91.98% C++ 3.80% Assembly 0.37% HTML 0.06% Python 2.25% Jupyter Notebook 1.54%

met4fof-smartupunit's People

Contributors

Stargazers

Watchers

Forkers

majidam20 beseetek mniehus hjgqx996 anupam-prasad

met4fof-smartupunit's Issues

GPS Tyming Glitch

The absolute time stamping jumps from time to time by approx. 60 seconds, is possibly related to timer overflow.

nano seconds D-SI String in GPS publisher

clean up includes

Met4FoF-SmartUpUnit/Src/freertos.cpp

Lines 52 to 55 in 8005313

 //TODO clean up includes 

 #include "FreeRTOS.h" 

 #include "task.h" 

 #include "main.h"

This issue was generated by todo based on a `TODO` comment in `8005313`. It's been assigned to @BeSeeTek because they committed the code.

implement weightend menad value filter

Met4FoF-SmartUpUnit/Src/NMEAPraser.c

Lines 653 to 657 in 83de7dc

 //TODO implement weightend menad value filter 

 time_uncertainty_tmp=2*sqrt(time_uncertainty_tmp)*NANOSECONDSTOTICKSSCALEFACKTOR; 

 time_uncertainty_tmp=round(time_uncertainty_tmp); 

 uint32_t time_uncertainty_int32=(uint32_t)time_uncertainty_tmp; 

 #if DEBUG_GPS == 1

This issue was generated by todo based on a `TODO` comment in `83de7dc`. It's been assigned to @BeSeeTek because they committed the code.

Fix bug in SPI2 and MPU intialsation witch leeds to failiure in first loop but s...

Met4FoF-SmartUpUnit/Src/freertos.cpp

Lines 645 to 649 in 205d27c

 MPU9250* MPUSSenors[5]={&Sensor0,&Sensor1,&Sensor2,&Sensor3,&Sensor2};//TODO Fix bug in SPI2 and MPU intialsation witch leeds to failiure in first loop but succes if an other sensor gets inited before this makes absolutly no sense at all nasty workaround: init sernsor 2 fail --> init senor 3 -->init sensor 2 again succes 

 for(int i=0;i<5;i++){ 

 MPU9250* MPUSensor=MPUSSenors[i]; 

 //MPU9250 

 uint32_t MPUId=configMan.getSensorBaseID(i);

This issue was generated by todo based on a `TODO` comment in `205d27c`. It's been assigned to @BeSeeTek because they committed the code.

Fix bug in SPI2 and MPU intialsation witch leeds to failiure in first loop but s...

Met4FoF-SmartUpUnit/Src/freertos.cpp

Lines 653 to 658 in 50def6f

 { &Sensor0, &Sensor1, &Sensor2, &Sensor3, &Sensor2 };//TODO Fix bug in SPI2 and MPU intialsation witch leeds to failiure in first loop but succes if an other sensor gets inited before this makes absolutly no sense at all nasty workaround: init sernsor 2 fail --> init senor 3 -->init sensor 2 again succes 

 for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) { 

 MPU9250 *MPUSensor = MPUSSenors[i]; 

 //MPU9250 

 uint32_t MPUId = configMan.getSensorBaseID(i); 

 MPUSensor->setBaseID(MPUId);

This issue was generated by todo based on a `TODO` comment in `50def6f`. It's been assigned to @BeSeeTek because they committed the code.

deal with to fast sensor corecctly maybe deactivating STM32 ISR investigate if p...

Met4FoF-SmartUpUnit/Src/freertos.cpp

Lines 489 to 494 in 50def6f

 //TODO deal with to fast sensor corecctly maybe deactivating STM32 ISR investigate if power cycle of MPU is needed 

 if (freqToHigh or freqToLow) { 

 if (freqToHigh) { 

 SEGGER_RTT_printf(0, "Sensor ID %u Freq to HIGH\n", i); 

 } else { 

 SEGGER_RTT_printf(0, "Sensor ID %u Freq to LOW\n", i);

This issue was generated by todo based on a `TODO` comment in `50def6f`. It's been assigned to @BeSeeTek because they committed the code.

check this

Met4FoF-SmartUpUnit/Src/bma280.cpp

Lines 303 to 307 in 8005313

 Message->f_Data_10=255; // TODO check this 

 } 

 return retVal; 

 }

This issue was generated by todo based on a `TODO` comment in `8005313`. It's been assigned to @BeSeeTek because they committed the code.

profile this code

Met4FoF-SmartUpUnit/Src/freertos.cpp

Lines 858 to 863 in 50def6f

 //TODO profile this code 

 ProtoStreamDescription = pb_ostream_from_buffer( 

 ProtoBufferDescription, MTU_SIZE); 

 pb_write(&ProtoStreamDescription, 

 (const pb_byte_t*) &DescriptionString, 4);

This issue was generated by todo based on a `TODO` comment in `50def6f`. It's been assigned to @BeSeeTek because they committed the code.

put id configuration in al loop

Met4FoF-SmartUpUnit/Src/freertos.cpp

Lines 690 to 695 in 50def6f

 //TODO put id configuration in al loop 

 //Internal ADC 

 //uint32_t SensorID10=configMan.getSensorBaseID(10); 

 //Met4FoFADC.setBaseID(SensorID10); 

 uint32_t SensorID20 = configMan.getSensorBaseID(20); 

 GPSPub.setBaseID(SensorID20);

This issue was generated by todo based on a `TODO` comment in `50def6f`. It's been assigned to @BeSeeTek because they committed the code.

Battery is dranied in power off state fast.

ADC hangs some time delivers the same value over and over!!

Ad sanor manger to avid code doubling

Met4FoF-SmartUpUnit/Src/freertos.cpp

Lines 841 to 846 in 50def6f

 // TODO Ad sanor manger to avid code doubling 

 // and automatic loop over all aktive sensors 

 Met4FoFSensor *Sensor = Sensors[sensorcount]; 

 for (int i = 0; i < NUMDESCRIPTIONSTOSEND; i++) { 

 DescriptionMessage Descriptionmsg; 

 Sensor->getDescription(&Descriptionmsg,

This issue was generated by todo based on a `TODO` comment in `50def6f`. It's been assigned to @BeSeeTek because they committed the code.

Consider updating protobuf to 3.15.0 in /tools

Watch out for the Dependabot PR #18, which explains in detail why this is important and simplifys the process.

fix nanospecs printf bug to reactivate --specs=nano.specs -u _printf_float -u _s...

Met4FoF-SmartUpUnit/Src/freertos.cpp

Lines 584 to 589 in 50def6f

  //TODO fix nanospecs printf bug to reactivate --specs=nano.specs -u _printf_float -u _scanf_float to save 50 kb Code size 

  GPSCounterFreq=GPS_ref.xtal_err; 

  GPSCounterFreqUncer=GPS_ref.xtal_err_deviation; 

  NTPCounterFreq=NTP_ref.xtal_err; 

  NTPCounterFreqUncer=NTP_ref.xtal_err_deviation; 

  sprintf(Temp_Buffer_text, "Counter Freq.: %lf Hz ",GPS_ref.xtal_err);

This issue was generated by todo based on a `TODO` comment in `50def6f`. It's been assigned to @BeSeeTek because they committed the code.

COMPARE WITH NTP may be a second diference !!

Met4FoF-SmartUpUnit/Src/freertos.cpp

Lines 337 to 342 in 50def6f

 //TODO COMPARE WITH NTP may be a second diference !! 

 lgw_gps_get(&utc, &gps_time, NULL, NULL); 

 if (last_utc.tv_sec != utc.tv_sec 

 || last_utc.tv_nsec != utc.tv_nsec) { 

 lgw_gps_sync(&GPS_ref, rptr->RawTimerCount, utc,

	//TODO clean up includes
	#include "FreeRTOS.h"
	#include "task.h"
	#include "main.h"

	//TODO implement weightend menad value filter
	time_uncertainty_tmp=2sqrt(time_uncertainty_tmp)NANOSECONDSTOTICKSSCALEFACKTOR;
	time_uncertainty_tmp=round(time_uncertainty_tmp);
	uint32_t time_uncertainty_int32=(uint32_t)time_uncertainty_tmp;
	#if DEBUG_GPS == 1

	MPU9250* MPUSSenors[5]={&Sensor0,&Sensor1,&Sensor2,&Sensor3,&Sensor2};//TODO Fix bug in SPI2 and MPU intialsation witch leeds to failiure in first loop but succes if an other sensor gets inited before this makes absolutly no sense at all nasty workaround: init sernsor 2 fail --> init senor 3 -->init sensor 2 again succes
	for(int i=0;i<5;i++){
	MPU9250* MPUSensor=MPUSSenors[i];
	//MPU9250
	uint32_t MPUId=configMan.getSensorBaseID(i);

	{ &Sensor0, &Sensor1, &Sensor2, &Sensor3, &Sensor2 };//TODO Fix bug in SPI2 and MPU intialsation witch leeds to failiure in first loop but succes if an other sensor gets inited before this makes absolutly no sense at all nasty workaround: init sernsor 2 fail --> init senor 3 -->init sensor 2 again succes
	for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
	MPU9250 *MPUSensor = MPUSSenors[i];
	//MPU9250
	uint32_t MPUId = configMan.getSensorBaseID(i);
	MPUSensor->setBaseID(MPUId);

	//TODO deal with to fast sensor corecctly maybe deactivating STM32 ISR investigate if power cycle of MPU is needed
	if (freqToHigh or freqToLow) {
	if (freqToHigh) {
	SEGGER_RTT_printf(0, "Sensor ID %u Freq to HIGH\n", i);
	} else {
	SEGGER_RTT_printf(0, "Sensor ID %u Freq to LOW\n", i);

	//TODO profile this code
	ProtoStreamDescription = pb_ostream_from_buffer(
	ProtoBufferDescription, MTU_SIZE);
	pb_write(&ProtoStreamDescription,
	(const pb_byte_t*) &DescriptionString, 4);

	//TODO put id configuration in al loop
	//Internal ADC
	//uint32_t SensorID10=configMan.getSensorBaseID(10);
	//Met4FoFADC.setBaseID(SensorID10);
	uint32_t SensorID20 = configMan.getSensorBaseID(20);
	GPSPub.setBaseID(SensorID20);

	// TODO Ad sanor manger to avid code doubling
	// and automatic loop over all aktive sensors
	Met4FoFSensor *Sensor = Sensors[sensorcount];
	for (int i = 0; i < NUMDESCRIPTIONSTOSEND; i++) {
	DescriptionMessage Descriptionmsg;
	Sensor->getDescription(&Descriptionmsg,

	//TODO fix nanospecs printf bug to reactivate --specs=nano.specs -u _printf_float -u _scanf_float to save 50 kb Code size
	GPSCounterFreq=GPS_ref.xtal_err;
	GPSCounterFreqUncer=GPS_ref.xtal_err_deviation;
	NTPCounterFreq=NTP_ref.xtal_err;
	NTPCounterFreqUncer=NTP_ref.xtal_err_deviation;
	sprintf(Temp_Buffer_text, "Counter Freq.: %lf Hz ",GPS_ref.xtal_err);

	//TODO COMPARE WITH NTP may be a second diference !!
	lgw_gps_get(&utc, &gps_time, NULL, NULL);

	if (last_utc.tv_sec != utc.tv_sec
	\|\| last_utc.tv_nsec != utc.tv_nsec) {
	lgw_gps_sync(&GPS_ref, rptr->RawTimerCount, utc,

met4fof / met4fof-smartupunit Goto Github PK

met4fof-smartupunit's People

Contributors

Stargazers

Watchers

Forkers

met4fof-smartupunit's Issues

This issue was generated by todo based on a TODO comment in 8005313. It's been assigned to @BeSeeTek because they committed the code.

This issue was generated by todo based on a TODO comment in 83de7dc. It's been assigned to @BeSeeTek because they committed the code.

This issue was generated by todo based on a TODO comment in 205d27c. It's been assigned to @BeSeeTek because they committed the code.

This issue was generated by todo based on a TODO comment in 50def6f. It's been assigned to @BeSeeTek because they committed the code.

This issue was generated by todo based on a TODO comment in 50def6f. It's been assigned to @BeSeeTek because they committed the code.

This issue was generated by todo based on a TODO comment in 8005313. It's been assigned to @BeSeeTek because they committed the code.

This issue was generated by todo based on a TODO comment in 50def6f. It's been assigned to @BeSeeTek because they committed the code.

This issue was generated by todo based on a TODO comment in 50def6f. It's been assigned to @BeSeeTek because they committed the code.

This issue was generated by todo based on a TODO comment in 50def6f. It's been assigned to @BeSeeTek because they committed the code.

This issue was generated by todo based on a TODO comment in 50def6f. It's been assigned to @BeSeeTek because they committed the code.

This issue was generated by todo based on a TODO comment in 50def6f. It's been assigned to @BeSeeTek because they committed the code.

Recommend Projects

Recommend Topics

Recommend Org

This issue was generated by todo based on a `TODO` comment in `8005313`. It's been assigned to @BeSeeTek because they committed the code.

This issue was generated by todo based on a `TODO` comment in `83de7dc`. It's been assigned to @BeSeeTek because they committed the code.

This issue was generated by todo based on a `TODO` comment in `205d27c`. It's been assigned to @BeSeeTek because they committed the code.

This issue was generated by todo based on a `TODO` comment in `50def6f`. It's been assigned to @BeSeeTek because they committed the code.

This issue was generated by todo based on a `TODO` comment in `50def6f`. It's been assigned to @BeSeeTek because they committed the code.

This issue was generated by todo based on a `TODO` comment in `8005313`. It's been assigned to @BeSeeTek because they committed the code.

This issue was generated by todo based on a `TODO` comment in `50def6f`. It's been assigned to @BeSeeTek because they committed the code.

This issue was generated by todo based on a `TODO` comment in `50def6f`. It's been assigned to @BeSeeTek because they committed the code.

This issue was generated by todo based on a `TODO` comment in `50def6f`. It's been assigned to @BeSeeTek because they committed the code.

This issue was generated by todo based on a `TODO` comment in `50def6f`. It's been assigned to @BeSeeTek because they committed the code.

This issue was generated by todo based on a `TODO` comment in `50def6f`. It's been assigned to @BeSeeTek because they committed the code.