Bug encountered with panel_albedo reporting different reflectance values about imageprocessing HOT 2 OPEN

I have the same problem! It seems that the panel boundaries are being wrongly recognized. Has anyone managed to solve this problem?

from imageprocessing.

I've been doing some work on adding support for the RP06 panels to our application and this issue caught my attention. It looks like the panel captured in example 1 and example 2 is different based on the QR serial number printed at the top of the board, which seems to be the most likely explanation. If you inspect the minimum and maximum reflectance that are encoded in the QR code you will find they are slightly different:

Example 1
Min WL: 400.0
Min RF: 0.482
Max WL: 1000.0
Max RF: 0.475

Example 2
Min WL: 400.0
Min RF: 0.492
Max WL: 1000.0
Max RF: 0.484

Perhaps the lambertian material is slightly different hence the different range of values provided by MicaSense?

In our case, the values encoded in the QR code are far more suspicious as the min and max reflectance values are exactly the same, which I've reached out to MicaSense about:

400.0
0.517
1000.0
0.517

I am simply printing the values to the console that are found in panel::reflectance_from_panel_serial

I hope this helps.

from imageprocessing.