tuareg-use-syntax-ppss running into error about tuareg HOT 5 CLOSED

It makes no sense introducing a boolean
tuareg-use-syntax-ppss

if alternatively an error is sent:

(defalias 'tuareg-in-literal-or-comment
[ ... ](eval-and-compile %28if tuareg-use-syntax-ppss
'tuareg-ppss-in-literal-or-comment
'tuareg-!ppss-in-literal-or-comment)))
and then:

(defun tuareg-ppss-in-literal-or-comment () (error "tuareg uses PPSS"))

At least it makes sense to me, so it doesn't hold that "It makes no
sense" in general. IOW please be more specific.

    Stefan

from tuareg.

Why offer an alternative, which, if choosen, only results in error?

BTW the whole section around in-literal and in-comment looks plain of useless code - a club-med of redundancies.

from tuareg.

BTW in-comment checks eval true also if at beginning-of-comment. Which makes sense. Consider to introduce the respective for literals

from tuareg.

Why offer an alternative, which, if choosen, only results in error?

How 'bout because it's not supposed to result in an error?
How 'bout actually reporting the error you see with a recipe?

BTW the whole section around in-literal and in-comment looks plain of
useless code - a club-med of redundancies.

That's expected,

    Stefan

from tuareg.

The code now assumes PPSS.

from tuareg.