Proof of Liabilities specification and Javascript implementation.

Proof of Liabilities (PoL) is a scheme designed to let companies that accept monetary deposits from consumers (e.g. Bitcoin exchanges, gambling websites, online Bitcoin wallets, etc.) prove their total amount of deposits (their liabilities) without compromising the privacy of individual users.

The Proof of Liabilities scheme can be used as part of the broader Proof of Solvency scheme.

Proof of Liabilities online tools

Table of Contents

• Install
• Usage
• Library usage
• Implementations
• Specification
  • Definitions
  • Serialized data formats (work in progress / draft)
  • Publishing protocol
• References

npm install -g lproof

Simple usage:

# Generate a partial tree for all users in accounts.json.
# Partial trees will be saved to partial_trees/ directory.
# complete_tree.json and root.json will be saved to current directory.
# For a sample accounts file, refer to test/accounts.json.

$ lproof generate -f accounts.json

# Verify a partial tree 

$ lproof verify --root root.json -f partial_trees/satoshi.json

# or (where hash is the root hash and sum is the root sum)

$ lproof verify --hash "1ded5478d0116b30aca091f8d5ddd2340d9391dca47a41d9271e61ede51c0f6b" --sum 37618 -f mark.json

Advanced usage:

# Create complete proof tree from an accounts file (see
# test/account.json for format)

$ lproof completetree -f test/accounts.json --human
$ lproof completetree -f test/accounts.json > complete.out.json

# Extract partial tree for user mark.

$ lproof partialtree mark -f complete.out.json --human
$ lproof partialtree mark -f complete.out.json > mark.out.json

# Display root node hash and sum

$ lproof root -f complete.out.json --human

# Verify partial tree

$  verify --hash "1ded5478d0116b30aca091f8d5ddd2340d9391dca47a41d9271e61ede51c0f6b" --sum 37618 -f mark.out.json

See cli.js.

Browser build: browserify index.js --standalone lproof > build/lproof.js.

• Javascript: olalonde/proof-of-liabilities
• Clojure: zw/PoLtree
• Ruby: peatio/liability-proof
• Python: ConceptPending/proveit

Non interoperable implementations:

• C++: bifubao/proof_of_reserves, payward/krakendb

The complete proof tree is a binary tree where the leaf nodes represent all the user accounts and the internal nodes generated using the NodeCombiner function described below.

The complete tree should be kept private by the operator in order to protect the privacy of its users. Only the root node should be published publicly and each individual user should have private access to their own partial proof tree.

Ideally the tree layout should be random.

Leaf nodes represent user accounts. They possess the following values:

• user: A unique identifier for the user. The user must ensure the uniqueness of this value so using their username or e-mail is recommended (it is never revealed by this scheme).
• nonce: A random secret assigned by the operator to prevent neighbours from accidentally or deliberately discovering the value of user or sum (balance).
• sum: The user's balance (called sum for consistency with internal nodes).
• hash: SHA256(user + '|' + sum + '|' + nonce)

Internal nodes are generated using the NodeCombiner function described below.

The node's sum is the result of adding of its children's sums.

The node's hash is its sum concatenated with its children's hashes, fed to SHA256.

function NodeCombiner (left_child, right_child) {
  var n = {};
  n.sum = left_child.sum + right_child.sum;
  n.hash = sha256(string(n.sum) + '|' + left_child.hash + '|' + right_child.hash);
  return n;
}

The root node of the, tree like all internal nodes, possesses a hash and a sum. This data must be published publicly so that all users can ensure they're verifying against the same proof tree.

A partial proof tree contains only the nodes from the complete tree which a given user needs in order to verify he was included in the tree.

It can be generated by starting with the user's leaf node and including every parent node up the tree, up to and including the root node (the root path). Then the sibling of each node on the path must be added to the tree.

• All internal nodes should be completely stripped of their data to encourage verifiers to compute it themselves.

• All leaf nodes except for the leaf representing the given user should be stripped of their user and nonce properties to ensure privacy.

• The leaf representing the given user should be stripped of its hash property to encourage verifiers to compute it themselves.

Partial trees should be disclosed privately to each individual user so they can verify the proof, learning an absolute minimum about their neigbours.

This section is intended to standardize the way root nodes and trees are generated and represented in order to make implementations compatible.

To be accepted by conforming verifier tools, leaf (account) node hashes must be computed using:

SHA256(user + '|' + string(sum) + '|' + nonce)

where user, sum and nonce have the same meanings as above, but specifically:

• strings are trimmed of any whitespace then joined using the pipe character (ASCII 0x7C) as a separator; no ASCII NULs are included in the SHA256 input
• string(sum) is a string representation of the balance for the corresponding account, matching the regular expression ^(0|[1-9][0-9]*)(\.[0-9]+)?$ (or informally, the JSON 'number' format but no negative numbers and no 'e' notation). This representation must be in the shortest possible form allowed by the regular expression, achieved by stripping trailing zero digits from the fractional part^[1]. The representation should not use more decimal places than required to represent the currency's smallest subunit; if the operator's system uses more decimal places, the value should be rounded towards +∞ to the next subunit before any use (addition/hashing/serialisation) in this scheme. Any conversion performed to produce or consume it should be done very carefully. Examples:
  • given $0, use 0, not 0.0 or 0.000
  • given $1.23 use 1.23, not 1.230 or 1.23000000
  • given $1.20 use 1.2, not 1.20 or 1.20000
  • given $20.00 use 20, not 20.00 or 20.000000
  • prefer to round $1234.5678 to $1234.57 before any use in this scheme
• nonce is encoded as a hexadecimal string.

Example: if user [email protected] had a balance of 3.1415 bitcoins and had been been assigned nonce e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb924 by the operator, the hash would take the following string as input:

[email protected]|3.1415|e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb924

producing (hexadecimal-encoded) hash:

7856aa35ddcf71ab84d18c16d5ac1b90b19e6d54e932d972595235d343c17461

Internal (non-account) node hashes must be computed using:

SHA256(string(sum) + '|' + left_child.hash + '|' + right_child.hash)

where sum, left_child.hash and right_child.hash have the same meanings as above, but specifically:

• strings are trimmed of any whitespace then joined using the pipe character (ASCII 0x7C) as a separator; no ASCII NULs are included in the SHA256 input
• string(sum) is as above for leaf nodes, except represents the liabilities sum for the subtree.
• left_child.hash(/right_child.hash) is the 64-digit hexadecimal string encoding (with lowercase letters) of the left(/right) child's hash

Example: if an internal node had a subtree liability sum of 71.31 bitcoins and child nodes with (hexadecimal-encoded) hashes of 000d5478d0116b30aca091f8d5ddd2340d9391dca47a41d9271e61ede51c0f6b (left) and 20aa3f466728a58182a9b7733fcb70044ab489a27554d9fb7ed520936759bf96 (right), the hash would take the following string as input:

71.31|000d5478d0116b30aca091f8d5ddd2340d9391dca47a41d9271e61ede51c0f6b|20aa3f466728a58182a9b7733fcb70044ab489a27554d9fb7ed520936759bf96

producing (hexadecimal-encoded) hash:

81dbc2416e7ead6a4ac1db605c56e293119a7ed65f3c80fdf1abbceeef22ac15

A JSON object:

{
  "root": {
    "sum": <JSON string, as described above>,
    "hash": <JSON string, as described above>
  },
  "currency": <JSON string>,
  "timestamp": <JSON number>
}

hash and sum are calculated as described above; both are JSON strings. hash is encoded as a 64-digit hexadecimal string with lowercase letters. The contents of string sum should be identical to the representation used in hashing, but equivalents (which add a fractional part with zeros in all decimal places, or which add trailing zeros to an existing fractional part) that still match the regex are allowed.

currency is the 3 letter ISO 4217 currency code (e.g. USD for United States dollar). If there is no ISO 4217 currency code for the currency, use the code that Bloomberg uses (e.g. XBT for Bitcoin) and otherwise, spell out the full currency name in lowercase (e.g. namecoin).

timestamp is a UNIX timestamp, which is the number of milliseconds between Epoch and the time at which the user balances were retrieved.

Example:

{
  "root": {
    "sum": "37618",
    "hash": "e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855"
  },
  "currency": "XBT",
  "timestamp": 1395718369805
}

Partial trees are represented as a JSON object graph made up of nodes. Each node has the following format:

{
  "left": <node>,
  "right": <node>,
  "data": <node_data>
}

<node_data> is a JSON object containing some subset of the following name/value pairs:

• sum (JSON string): as described above. The contents should be identical to the representation used in hashing, but equivalents (which add a fractional part with zeros in all decimal places, or which add trailing zeros to an existing fractional part) that still match the regex are allowed.
  • Immediate children of nodes on the root path must have this key set.
  • Other nodes should not have this key set.
• hash (JSON string): generated as described above, encoded as a 64-digit hexadecimal string with lowercase letters.
  • Immediate children of nodes on the root path must have this key set.
  • Other nodes should not have this key set.
• user (JSON string): The unique string chosen by the user.
  • The node belonging to the user this partial tree was generated for must have this key set.
  • All other nodes must not have this key set.
• nonce (JSON string): The nonce assigned to the user, encoded as a hexadecimal string with lowercase letters.
  • Should be at least 128 bits of cryptographically strong entropy.
  • The node belonging to the user this partial tree was generated for must have this key set.
  • All other nodes must not have this key set.

If redundant keys are omitted as suggested, the "data": <node_data> key/value pair will have an empty object ({}) for <node_data>, in which case the key/value pair should be omitted.

Example leaf node's <node_data>:

{
  "user": "[email protected]",
  "sum": "3.1415",
  "nonce": "e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb924",
}

Example <node_data> for an immediate child of a node on the root path:

{
  "sum": "71.31",
  "hash": "81dbc2416e7ead6a4ac1db605c56e293119a7ed65f3c80fdf1abbceeef22ac15"
}

For the purposes of sharing test input and to help pin down inconsistencies between implementations, it would help if your implementation accepted an account list in the following form. This need not be its usual or only means of accepting account lists.

An account list is a JSON array of JSON objects:

[
  {
    "user": <JSON string, as described above>,
    "balance": <JSON string as described above>,
    "nonce": <JSON string as described above>
  }
  {
    "user": <JSON string, as described above>,
    "balance": <JSON string as described above>,
    "nonce": <JSON string as described above>
  }
  ...
]

Trees should ideally be given random layouts normally but when accepting this form for testing you should produce the tree with a deterministic algorithm:

• pad out the accounts list size to the next power of two, using accounts with user "dummy", balance "0.00000000" and nonce "0"
• produce a perfect binary tree
• ensure that a traversal of the tree would visit the leaf nodes in the same order they appeared

This ensures that the root hash for the tree is deterministic and predictable which makes tests shareable.

[1]: Note that there's a bug in BigDecimal.stripTrailingZeros in JDK <8 where 0.000 doesn't change.

See olalonde/proof-of-solvency.

• Gregory Maxwell for coming up with the original idea
• @zw for co-authoring the specification
• All implementers

• https://iwilcox.me.uk/2014/proving-bitcoin-reserves
• Reddit announcement
• HN post
• Example of how a shared wallet website could use the CLI