Prefix operator rather than postfix in IMM addressing mode about olcnes HOT 2 OPEN

Hi d0gtail,
That's a really interesting observation. And thanks, because it shows me a location I can make the code clearer. In this instance, all reads of opcodes increment the pc, so the addr_abs is actually set to the correct value. Reading from addr_abs in fetch() does not increment the pc, because this would be very disruptive to program flow :D. Now in the unique circumstances of IMM, I need to increase the pc, so the next opcode can be read from the correct location because its the only address mode that has the actual data as part of the instruction. In the next upload, I'll flesh this out so its more obvious why this is the case.
Thanks!

from olcnes.

Hi David,
thanks for your review of the issue and all the hard work you're pouring in this project. Now I see how addr_abs still points to the right position. At first it looked like the pc increment to the value had to be done in the IMM function but since it's incremented by the read of the opcode all is fine. As you said it's wasn't obvious at the first glance.
Should I close the issue now?
Thanks!

from olcnes.