Giter VIP home page Giter VIP logo

geosemantics-dwg's Introduction

This is the open repository for work done within the OGC GeoSemantics DWG.

GeoSPARQL

This group has been gathering change requests for GeoSPARQL 2.0 and has described the benefits of semantic and graph technologies for spatial data in a white paper, explaining the business reasons, and requirements, for a geographical query language for graphs as well as an accompanying ontology.

The GeoSPARQL SWG is actively working on updates of the GeoSPARQL standard in a separate github repository.

The charter: OGC GeoSPARQL SWG Charter

The white paper: OGC Benefits of Representing Spatial Data Using Semantic and Graph Technologies

GeoDCAT

An SWG, jointly hosted by the GeoSemantics DWG and the MetaCat DWG, is being set up for the publication of GeoDCAT, GeoDCAT-AP, and other profiles of DCAT to support use of OGC standards.

OGC GeoDCAT SWG Charter

Notes from 22 NOv 2022 ad hoc meeting on OGC GeoDCAT

geosemantics-dwg's People

Stargazers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

Watchers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

geosemantics-dwg's Issues

input from CRMgeo?

Hi all,

I just wanted to point to work done by the CIDOC-CRM people. This group made a Concept Reference Model (CRM) or ontology for cultural heritage management which is since 2006 an ISO standard. As far as I could derive from literature and their website, they mainly use text reports and formalized schemas in RDF serializations and 'plain' XML.

This group also host numerous extensions to the 'base' CRM model, including one named CRMgeo oriented at spatiotemporal concepts that extends concepts of GeoSPARQL. I think the most recent version of CRMgeo is 1.4, but I could not find a confirmation on the official CIDOC-CRM page.

It might be relevant to go through the CRMgeo proposal, as it probably contains extensions or concepts that are relevant for other application domains working with spatiotemporal data. Maybe we can ask some of the developers to contribute to this white paper (use cases and/or proposals for extensions)?

Potential relevant sources:

geojson-ld, jena and converting to RDF from QGIS Desktop

This issue covers some of the discussion in the gitter channel of the sprint

The typical use case raised by the jena team is an ability to convert spatial data to rdf using a tool like qgis or geoserver and push it to fuseki. They currently use an approach with CSV containing wkt.

An alternative would be the use of GeoJSON-ld. GeoJSON-ld has long struggled with a limitation in json-ld to have exted arrays. This limitation has been resolved in json-ld spec 1.1, however from the documentation it is not clear if current jena support the 1.0 or 1.1 json-ld specification. My impression is that 1.1 is not supported.

GeoJSON-ld is a very likely encoding of OGC API Features & Records output, some implementations are already available, for example at https://demo.pygeoapi.io/master/collections/lakes/items?f=jsonld

An alternative approach here is to use SPARQL to query an OGC API Features endpoint (in case it supports json-ld).
You can use the ARQ tool which is included in the jena-release to query a json-ld document (and all documents linked from that document). This case brings in some suggestions to a JSON-ld output encoding of OGC API's, this case would benefit from bidirectional links between collections and items.

Too many similar examples

Many of the Use Cases mention the Optique platform and use the acronym VKG, which I've not hear before, so it's obvious that they have all been source from one similar place. I suggest some of them are replaced with different Use Cases and different approaches/tools.

GeoDCAT-AP

Dear WG,

I am supporting SEMIC as editor for the DCAT profiles. I heard that OGC is willing to invest in an update on GeoDCAT-AP.
I reach out to streamline this activity.

kr,

Bert

Dangling references

The White Paper, clause 2 cites [53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65] but there are no reference with those IDs given that I could find.

I assume these come from the non-resolving reference [3]?

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    ๐Ÿ–– Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. ๐Ÿ“Š๐Ÿ“ˆ๐ŸŽ‰

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google โค๏ธ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.