[PRE REVIEW]: otoole: OSeMOSYS Tools for Energy Work about joss-reviews HOT 27 CLOSED

@olejandro @fneum – many thanks for agreeing to review here! See you over in #5511 where the actual review will take place.

from joss-reviews.

@olejandro : Great, thanks! I add you to the reviewer list.

from joss-reviews.

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

from joss-reviews.

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.09 s (685.4 files/s, 132039.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          29           1496           1708           5461
YAML                            11             38             36           1077
reStructuredText                12            365            183            984
TeX                              1             10              0            132
INI                              1             11              0             73
Markdown                         2             25              0             55
JSON                             1              0              0             26
Bourne Shell                     2              6              4             24
make                             1              6              8             15
TOML                             1              1              3              5
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            61           1958           1942           7852
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

from joss-reviews.

Wordcount for paper.md is 977

from joss-reviews.

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.033 is OK
- 10.12688/openreseurope.15461.1 is OK
- 10.1038/s41597-022-01737-0 is OK
- 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.039 is OK
- 10.1007/s12532-017-0130-5 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.6522795 is OK
- 10.1016/j.esr.2021.100650 is OK
- 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.07.007 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

from joss-reviews.

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot invite @fraukewiese as editor

Hi @fraukewiese, could you edit this submission? It looks to be in your wheelhouse.

from joss-reviews.

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

from joss-reviews.

Thanks for the request. Yes I can edit this submission.

from joss-reviews.

@whedon assign me as editor

from joss-reviews.

My name is now @editorialbot

from joss-reviews.

@trevorb1 : Do you have suggestions for reviewers?

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot assign me as editor

from joss-reviews.

Assigned! @fraukewiese is now the editor

from joss-reviews.

Hi @fraukewiese, I will take a look at the list shortly and suggest some reviewers. Thanks for agreeing to be the editor!

from joss-reviews.

Hi @fraukewiese. Looking through the list provided by JOSS, suitable reviewers that we have no conflicts of interest with may be:

• brynpickering
• fneum
• olejandro
• zoltanmaric

If you need more names, please just let me know!

from joss-reviews.

@fneum , @olejandro , @zoltanmaric – would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

from joss-reviews.

Thanks @fraukewiese! Yes, I can do it.

from joss-reviews.

Hi @fraukewiese, the next weeks look a bit busy for me, so I could only do it from mid-June. Sign me up if that's ok and you don't find any reviewers with an earlier availability.

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot add @olejandro as reviewer

from joss-reviews.

@olejandro added to the reviewers list!

from joss-reviews.

@fneum : Thank you very much! I think mid June is fine, so I will add you as reviewer and know that you will not start before mid June

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot add @fneum as reviewer

from joss-reviews.

@fneum added to the reviewers list!

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot start review

from joss-reviews.

OK, I've started the review over in #5511.

from joss-reviews.