[PRE REVIEW]: Tethys: a Spatiotemporal Downscaling Model for Global Water Demand about joss-reviews HOT 35 CLOSED

Oops, it generated fine offline with the docker image, but I found and removed a tab character that may have caused this error.

from joss-reviews.

@ifthompson Sorry for my delay. Your submission has passed the scope review and I will start looking for an editor. However, I do need to place this on our waitlist to wait for a relevant editor. Thanks for your patience, again!

from joss-reviews.

Hi @jsta, yes I am interested.

from joss-reviews.

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

from joss-reviews.

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.06 s (680.7 files/s, 49268.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          17            358            240            702
SVG                              4              4              4            298
CSS                              2             54             11            244
reStructuredText                 8            227            235            220
YAML                             3             18              6             81
TeX                              1              0              0             52
Markdown                         2             18              0             48
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
JSON                             1              0              0             20
make                             1              4              7              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            40            691            504           1700
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

from joss-reviews.

Wordcount for paper.md is 561

from joss-reviews.

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf.

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot generate pdf

from joss-reviews.

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

from joss-reviews.

Hi @ifthompson and thanks for your submission! Because the size of the package is relatively small (lines of code < 1000) I need to ping the editorial board to vote on whether the submission is in scope in terms of substantial scholarly effort. This will take 1-2 weeks, thanks for your patience.

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot query scope

from joss-reviews.

Submission flagged for editorial review.

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot add @jsta as editor

from joss-reviews.

Assigned! @jsta is now the editor

from joss-reviews.

@ifthompson You have an editor now – @jsta – who will be taking over from here.

from joss-reviews.

Hi @ifthompson 👋, After reading the paper, I'm interested to hear more about the code operation over the course of the review. In the meantime, do you have any suggested reviewers?

from joss-reviews.

Hi @jsta 👋 , the conceptual overview section of the docs explains some of the ideas in the paper in more detail. Usually it is most convenient to control operation with a configuration file, and then just run tethys.run_model('configuration_file.yml). I'm happy to discuss the code more if you have specific questions. Also, pinging coauthor @zarrarkhan here who can also answer questions.

I don't know a lot of people so I don't have any suggested reviewers in mind. Can you pick volunteers?

from joss-reviews.

Thanks @ifthompson, it would be very helpful if you could provide reviewer suggestions for people in the subfield with whom you and your co-authors are unaffiliated. It's preferable that they already be active on Github but not strictly required.

from joss-reviews.

👋 @eldemet Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS?

from joss-reviews.

👋 @Mariosmsk Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS?

from joss-reviews.

Thanks so much @Mariosmsk ! it may be a little while until the review starts. Still need to find another reviewer.

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot add @Mariosmsk as reviewer

from joss-reviews.

@Mariosmsk added to the reviewers list!

from joss-reviews.

👋 @nickrsan Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

from joss-reviews.

@jsta thanks for thinking of me. I'd be willing to and the software looks interesting, but I'll note that downscaling isn't my area of expertise. I can possibly recommend another reviewer who knows Python and downscaling if you'd prefer.

from joss-reviews.

@nickrsan Thanks for the offer! Yes, please, other reviewer suggestions would be most welcome.

from joss-reviews.

The person I know who would have expertise in these areas is @khegewisch, if she's available. I'd still be happy to review the parts of it that are in my wheelhouse if you need a reviewer, but if Katherine has time/interest, I think she could better evaluate the methods, in addition to expertise in the software components.

from joss-reviews.

Hi, I'm sorry. I do not have time to do this.

from joss-reviews.

Thanks for the suggestion @nickrsan. Unfortunately, it seems Katherine is unavailable. Can I add you as a reviewer?

from joss-reviews.

Yes, I'm still willing, but likely can't review until at least October due to current commitments. If that's acceptable, I'd be happy to review the paper and code.

from joss-reviews.

That sounds reasonable to me! Thanks.

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot add @nickrsan as reviewer

from joss-reviews.

@nickrsan added to the reviewers list!

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot start review

from joss-reviews.

OK, I've started the review over in #5855.

from joss-reviews.