[PRE REVIEW]: 'Shinyscreen: Mass Spectrometry Data Inspection and Quality Checking Utility about joss-reviews HOT 27 CLOSED

Hi @kthyng I can edit this (don't think there's a way to accept the invite via editorialbot)

from joss-reviews.

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

from joss-reviews.

Checking the BibTeX entries failed with the following error:

No paper file path

from joss-reviews.

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.05 s (1093.0 files/s, 199303.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R                               29           1464            971           5112
Markdown                         7            227              0            580
Rmd                             10            255            542            240
JavaScript                       1             21             46            197
YAML                             1             18             19            120
Dockerfile                       5              5              7             83
CSS                              2             25             21             76
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            55           2015           1606           6408
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

from joss-reviews.

Failed to discover a Statement of need section in paper

from joss-reviews.

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf. Paper file not found.

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot set joss as branch

from joss-reviews.

Done! branch is now joss

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot generate pdf

from joss-reviews.

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

from joss-reviews.

@dhhagan would you be able to edit this submission?

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot invite @dhhagan as editor

from joss-reviews.

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

from joss-reviews.

@dhhagan you can assign yourself, but I'll go ahead and do it.

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot assign @dhhagan as editor

from joss-reviews.

Assigned! @dhhagan is now the editor

from joss-reviews.

Just updating this thread to let the authors know I have reached out to several potential reviewers offline and will update here as they respond.

from joss-reviews.

Thank you!

from joss-reviews.

For future reference (mostly for myself), the following have been invited to review:

• @yguitton
• @jspaezp
• @AnthonyOfSeattle

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot add @yguitton as reviewer

from joss-reviews.

@yguitton added to the reviewers list!

from joss-reviews.

Hello!

I am not sure if i have received the invitation to review as an email. I would be glad to review this work! (After next week if that is not a problem)

We can talk later about possibly updating my email address in file.

Kindest wishes
Sebastian

from joss-reviews.

Hi @jspaezp - sorry about the email confusion! Next week should be more than acceptable.

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot add @jspaezp as reviewer

from joss-reviews.

@jspaezp added to the reviewers list!

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot start review

from joss-reviews.

OK, I've started the review over in #5520.

from joss-reviews.