opynfinance / gamma-frontend Goto Github PK

• test on mainnet
• add a seperate weth-yusdc series

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
For an existing vault. - Its not possible to partially burn options against a vault and remove collateral in 1 step. Its not possible to easily know collateralization of that type of action as it is done in 2 steps. Its also not possible to add collateral and mint options in 1 step.

Describe the solution you'd like
I'd like the manage oToken tab to allow adjustments to both collateral (add or remove) + oTokens (allowing burns and mints)

• Users keep getting reverts on 0x txns through Metamask mobile -> is MM mobile auto-setting gas maybe?

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
We will potentially have both yUSDC and yETH collateralized ETH options (yUSDC for puts and yETH for calls). Right now the f/e seems to segregate options based on:

1. ETH options collateralized by either ETH or USDC
2. BTC options collateralized by either BTC or USDC
3. ETH put options collateralized by yUSDC

Describe the solution you'd like
The option chain for ETH/yUSDC should probably be renamed to something like ETH/yToken or ETH, yEarn collateral and include both yETH collateralized calls as well as yUSDC collateralized puts.

We probably need some messaging around the differences between chain #1 and chain #3

Additional context

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently the f/e defaults to showing all options, even those without liquidity

Describe the solution you'd like
Can we default to not showing options with 0 liquidity and allow people to see them all if they want via a checkbox or something?

This is reversing the flow currently which defaults to showing all options and allows people to filter out 0 liquidity options.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Additional context

It would be great if we show the ENS name and avatar if the user has it

Some users expressed confusion with which limit price to choose - we could autofill the price field with a suggested limit price similar to Robinhood to help mitigate

Describe the bug
For ETHUSDC/yUSDC put options, collateral is posted in yUSDC and the collateral required is based on the yUSDC/USDC exchange rate as well as the strike of the put. Right now the front end is assuming 1 yUSDC = 1 USDC, which is wrong and requires more collateral than is necessary.

A similar issue should exist for yETH collateralized calls if we add to f/e.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

1. Go to ETH/yUSDC option chain.
2. Click on the 2000 strike listed put bid and enter 1 for option size.
3. Scroll down to collateral required section, which will say 2000 yUSDC, when it should be closer to 1874.5 yUSDC as 1 yUSDC = ~1.0669 USDC

Expected behavior
Expect the yUSDC required to be less than the USDC required for a put as 1 yUSDC is worth more than 1 USDC. The fx rate has to be taken into account here. A few ways to get the price are Margin calculator, the yUSDC token contract, or our pricer contract for yUSDC.

Screenshots

Desktop (please complete the following information):

• OS: macos big sur
• Browser brave
• Version 1.27.109

• A user had a short position of 20 oTokens
• They bought oToken that reverted on 0x on-chain, but the position card thought it went through so it moved to the burn step. At the burn step he got the error that not enough oToken balance to burn. This makes sense because he had 0 oTokens since his buy txn failed.
• Then he bought 20 oTokens on trade page. So he had 20 short oTokens and 20 long oTokens. The dashboard registered this as an untraded position.
  • I added adjust collateral and manage oTokens for untraded positions since close position wasn't letting him burn & remove collateral (button was just disabled)
• After he burned position disappeared from the dashboard all together
• Had user remove collateral from gamma portal

Need to make sure that the position does not disappear from active positions on burn, but only upon also removing collateral

Maybe we add this to the same menu for approve vs. permit on sell side?

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Before an option is selected we should display a graph of the asset price history instead of "select an option"

Describe the solution you'd like
Before an option is selected we should display a graph of the asset price history instead of "select an option"

Describe alternatives you've considered
Another option is having no blank space before an option is selected and moving the option chain downward

Additional context