plepe / openstreetbrowser-categories-main Goto Github PK
View Code? Open in Web Editor NEWMapCSS styles of the "Main" category of OpenStreetBrowser
MapCSS styles of the "Main" category of OpenStreetBrowser
Currently the building height is color coded. In areas where most buildings range from 1 to 3 levels, it's hard to distinguish a single-story building from 2 or 3-story buildings, since the color variation between buildings is subtle.
What if the buildings rendered their level numbers and height?
https://www.openstreetbrowser.org/#map=20/-23.05079/-47.83707&categories=buildings-height
In example https://openstreetbrowser.org/#map=17/45.44823/11.66348&categories=hiking_routes,cycle_routes you can see that OSB does not recognize network=rwn;rcn
(route object is https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6048999)
Related discussions:
According https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/7927/how-can-i-see-the-speed-limit-of-a-street there should be a maxspeed display :)
Currently, cemeteries and grave yards are included in the "Religion" category (sub category of "Culture and Religion"). Graves are not included in any category.
I'm not very happy about this, because as non-religious people are buried too, cemeteries and graves are not necessarily religious.
So, I'd propose to remove cemeteries and grave yards from Religion unless they are religious.
Additionally, I'd create a new category "Cemeteries" (under "Culture and Religion") which includes cemeteries (regardless whether they are religious or not), grave yards, tombs, and (from a lower zoom level) graves.
Any thoughts on this?
I already started a Lanes category in my test repository: https://www.openstreetbrowser.org/#categories=plepe/test/lanes
Finish that and move it to main.
Mentioned here:
The new feature "pedestrian footways" is brilliant and also is a great aid to improve the map.
Cool that it also covers areas, however I found that a part of the market place in Würzburg is not shown:
Link: (https://www.openstreetbrowser.org/#map=18/49.79449/9.92908&basemap=osm-mapnik&categories=footways)
Observed: the market area in the center is not highlighted (the area around the "Marktbrunnen")
The issue is that this area is a multipolygon (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3865559), and therefore has no "area=yes" tag, because it is implied (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon).
Already "Outdoor activities" main category has 3 subcategories with object search: "Paddling", "Climbing" &
"Mountain bike routes". Would be great - in the event of numerous local (at the city level) of pedestrians/walking routes - to include the subcategory "Walking routes" searching for routes tagged route=foot.
Thanks in advance!
Since there's a lot of deal with pedestrian mobility and accessibility, let's add a few details:
crossing=marked
or crossing=uncontrolled
;crossing=traffic_signals
;crossing=unmarked
.button_operated=yes|no
;tactile_paving=yes|no
;crossing:island=yes|no
;Examples:
Hi,
Just discovered OpenStreetBrowser via weeklyOSM ... great project!
I also very much like the idea of using the standardised 😁 emoji as icons.
The sleeping accomodation icon for an artwork (here) seems a little counter-intuitive however ... 🎨 perhaps?
Cheers
implicit | maxspeed=<countrycode>:<zone type> |
It is common in some local communities, notably Romania and Russia, to use this tag for implicit speedlimits as well. It is used in Russia for areas where the speed limit is indicated on the street by use of a symbol or icon rather than a number. The format includes a country code followed by a ':' and a zone identifier (For example 'RO:urban'). This non-numeric notation is used to avoid the correction of an entire country map due to legislation changes regarding maximum speed. |
---|
Table of values: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed#Implicit_maxspeed_values
Until yesterday OpenStreetBrowser completely ignored the "office" key. Now I created an "Offices" category (under "Services"), but I'm not sure about it's usefulness. It would be great to get some input from the community on this.
Many of the tags should actually be included in other categories and I'm not sure what to do with the rest. Maybe you (or others) have some thoughts on this?
Of course we can include the tags in the others and have an additional "office" category anyway.
This are the top 60 values (according to https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/office#values) of the 'office' key:
value | suiting category |
---|---|
government | Services -> Public |
company | ? |
yes | ? |
estate_agent | ? |
insurance | ? maybe Services -> Financial |
lawyer | ? |
educational_institution | Services -> Education |
administrative | Services -> Public |
telecommunication | Services -> Communication |
ngo | New category "Organisations" |
association | New category "Organisations" |
it | Services -> Telecommunication ? |
accountant | Services -> Financial |
employment_agency | ? |
research | Services -> Education |
religion | Culture and Religion -> Religion |
architect | ? |
financial | Services -> Financial |
newspaper | Services -> Communication ? |
physician | Services -> Health |
therapist | Services -> Health |
travel_agent | Services -> Tourism |
political_party | New category "Organisations" |
advertising_agency | ? |
tax_advisor | Services -> Financial |
notary | ? |
energy_supplier | ? maybe Infrastructure -> Energy -> Offices |
foundation | New category "Organisations" |
logistics | ? |
water_utility | ? |
coworking | ? |
forestry | |
parish | Culture and Religion -> Religion |
consulting | |
medical | Services -> Health |
charity | New category "Organisations" |
construction_company | Infrastructure -> Construction Sites ??? |
guide | Services -> Tourism |
property_management | |
vacant | |
tax | Services -> Public and/or Services -> Financial |
moving_company | ? |
quango | New category "Organisations" |
camping | Services -> Tourism |
publisher | Services -> Communication |
engineering | |
surveyor | |
university | Services -> Education |
cooperative | Services -> Financial (not exactly sure what 'cooperative' means, but most used values have somtehing like "Saving and Credit Cooperative" in their name) |
taxi | Transport -> Public Transportation -> Amenities |
real_estate | |
engineer | Infrastructure -> Construction Sites ??? |
geodesist | |
transport | |
podologist | Services -> Health |
administration | Services -> Public |
union | New category "Organisations" |
security | |
solicitor | |
property_maintenance |
I also have thoughts about "office=yes" - currently it shows "yes" as description for map features of this type. I would like to write "unknown" (resp. its translation) instead. What do you think about that?
FACT : OpenStreetBrowser let see a lot of features and helps to see the coverage of objects added in OpenStreetMap, it's ovever difficult to improve the quality of these object for some tags.
IDEA : let create some displaying for tags that are really usefull and may show how OSMquality is relevance.
Some first queries would be welcome such as :
I think that there are too many and too diverse map features in the leisure category. I think, it's rather useless. I would like to split it into several sub-categories. I would like to have your input (@Cybereric @IgorEliezer @severinmenard @debyos @waldyrious and others who are interested) on this.
On this page, I listed the most common values and where (beside the current 'leisure' category) they are being queried right now (bold). Feel free to make suggestions in the "category" column, to which sub-categories you would add them to (and how to name them). You do have edit rights in the wiki, don't you?
Thanks!
BTW I noticed the minimum zoom level to be way too low to remain useful if you apply (such) filters. That's probably not only applicable to bicycle amenities but pretty much everything where you have set minimum zoom levels.
Originally posted by @stefanct in #46 (comment)
It would be welcome to create a disabled category that would stimulate contributions for mappers that are wishing to improve data for people that are in wheelchair, blind, deaf, cognitive disability.
Suggestion: add a "Lanes" category, maybe under the "Individual Traffic" subcategory.
This would include how many lanes each road has and/or what each lane is used for.
Dear All,
I have translated the categories into Hungarian. Please, upload the file to its place.
Thank you!
Gábor
When I browse some extra-urban area, I notices paths with steps, where there are no steps mapped. Unfortunately this deep-link https://openstreetbrowser.org/#footways/w470024951/details does not work. Here to OSM https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/470024951 - How come?
Hello.
Tag vending=parcel_pickup;parcel_mail_in
has just been replaced by amenity=parcel_locker
in proposition: Proposed_features/amenity=parcel_locker.
Are you going to support new scheme?
You can add bicycle or car facitilies to the OpenStreetBrowser. The browser will show you the Charging_Stations.
Unlikely he ignore the attributes motorcar=yes/no
or bicycle=yes/no
. You will see all motorcar charging_stations if you view facilities for bicycles
Requested in the Community forum:
Hello,
There's a lot of concern about how cities are suitable for pedestrians, specially children, elderly and people with mobility restrictions (wheelchair).
I think OSB could have a "Sidewalk" query showing:
(relevant issue: #51 )
OSB does not find all bike rental POIs. There are (at least) two unsupported schemes:
No result with filter for category Culture and Religion / Tourism.
In France and Germany, keys with "contact:" prefixe tend to be more common (see TagInfo: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=contact%3Ahousenumber#map) in order to add adresses on POI's without create duplicates with "addr:". An example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8855169707.
Adresses are structured like this:
contact:housenumber
contact:street
contact:postcode
contact:city
It would be a good idea to display them in POI's poped boxes just as it is already the case with "addr:" tags.
Show the OpenStreetMap community what data you are using. Add your project to the list of Taginfo Projects.
It may be best to split it up into multiple files for the different themes like MapComplete does.
Suggestion: I'd add "Protected Areas" under "Places" main category.
Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area
Since there are many types, we could start with:
protect_class=1 to 6
(natural park and protected land of all sorts)protect_class=22
(cultural heritage)24
(aboriginal) and 26
(ancient site).From: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/openstreetbrowser-new-category-pedestrian-footways/6562/14
Derweil stellt sich mir aber noch die Frage, ob es nicht Sinn machen würde, Betretungsverbote (access=private zB) anzuzeigen? In der Gegend sind da ein paar, manche auch mit Gattern verschlossen, nicht unterscheidbar im overlay.
Hi,
A new tag just has been approved: amenity=parcel_locker and describes a parcel locker.
It replaces previously used (and now deprecated) amenity=vending_machine + vending=parcel_pickup
I propose to:
Thanks
PS: deprecation follow-up (including similar requests to other tools) is available on this wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:vending%3Dparcel_pickup#Deprecation_follow-up
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
A PHP framework for web artisans
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
Data-Driven Documents codes.
China tencent open source team.